Guest guest Posted September 11, 2005 Report Share Posted September 11, 2005 Namaste, Who am I and I am. I see no difference really between these two sayings, as there is no real object in either. I am is I am, and Who am I? is a question. Both are to drive the mind inward to the feeling of 'Being' or the big 'I'. This is the important thing to remember the 'feeling' for it has no name really, not an I or I-I or any language.For the enquiry end up without an I and so does the I am, just an am............ONS..Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2005 Report Share Posted September 11, 2005 advaitin, "Tony OClery" <aoclery> wrote: > Namaste, Who am I and I am. > > I see no difference really between these two sayings, as there is no > real object in either. I am is I am, and Who am I? is a question. Both > are to drive the mind inward to the feeling of 'Being' or the big 'I'. > This is the important thing to remember the 'feeling' for it has no > name really, not an I or I-I or any language.For the enquiry end up > without an I and so does the I am, just an am............ONS..Tony. hariH OM! tony-ji, well said! this flags the core essence behind the play of the jiva *as well as* the jivatman(!), being the intended meaning behind what sages refer to as the Self or, as you mentioned, the Big 'I.' namaste, frank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.