Guest guest Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Namaste. You may see a Table of Contents, under the Introduction, in advaitin/message/27766 KDAS – 6 9. ELIGIBILITY FOR AATMA-SAADHANAA Let us not forget one thing. The regimen for Atma-Sadhana is to be undertaken only after the dirt in the mind and its vacillation have been removed. This is what our Acharya has prescribed. It is to eradicate this dirt and shakiness of the mind that karma and bhakti have been prescribed. He says so clearly that Saadhana-chatushTayam is only for him who has crossed this barrier of dirty and vacillatory mind. *sva-varNAshrama-dharmeNa tapasA hari-toshhaNAt / sAdhanaM prabhavet pumsAM vairAgyAdi chatushhTayaM //* (Aproksha-anubhUti: 3) It is ‘sva-varNAshrama-dharmaM’ (the dharma of one’s own varNa and own Ashrama) that is the karma-yoga of the individual. ‘Hari-toshhaNaM’ is the satisfaction of Hari, the Lord. In fact all our actions (karmas) are to be done for the satisfaction of the Lord (*Ishvara-prItyarthaM*). It is not necessary to do a separate pUjA (worship, propitiation). According to the Gita, to dedicate one’s svadharma-karma is itself bhakti. In Acharya’s ‘Sopana-panchakam’ (also known as Upadesha-panchakam) (first shloka) he says “Do your svadharma-karma well and consider that as the puja done to Ishvara”. However, to do it that way, that is, to have the attitude that all our actions are actually a propitiation to the Lord, is not such an easy task; and so bhakti has also been prescribed as a distinct loving worship of Ishvara. Karma is for purification of the mind and bhakti is for obtaining the one-pointedness of mind towards God. It is bhakti that is called ‘hari-toshhaNaM’ here. ‘Hari’ does not just mean Vishnu only. Every time when we say ‘HariH OM’ the ‘Hari’ means saguNa-brahman that denotes all possible deities. That is what it means here also. The word ‘toshhaNaM’ means ‘to give satisfaction’ or ‘to generate contentment’. If we show bhakti towards Bhagavan, He gets satisfaction and contentment that ‘this child of mine is coming back to good ways’. So ‘Hari-toshhaNaM’ means ‘bhakti-yoga’. The above quotation adds a ‘tapasA’ to ‘svadharma’ and ‘hari-toshhaNaM’. ‘tapas’ need not be a third. The ‘svadharma’ and ‘hari-toshhaNaM’ have both to be done as a penance (tapas), with the whole heart, regardless of any physical discomfort. Only for such of those who do this will Sadhana-chatushhTayaM’ be possible and be acceptable. That is what “sAdhanaM chatushTayaM prabhavet” means. Only after graduating from school you go to college. So also, he says: ‘First you purify your mind; make your mind capable of one-pointedness. Graduate from this and then come to me for admission to my college. Then you can step into the process of Enquiry into the Atman. Further up the ladder you can do the Enquiry more deeply. And still further on the question of its becoming an experience will arise. It is as if one finishes college, then goes to the master’s level and then on to the doctorate. In other words it is actually only after one gets Sannyasa”. This should not be taken to mean that one should not go anywhere near Atma-vidya unless he has completely purified his mind and obtained one-pointedness. If that stage has really been reached, there would be no more necessity to have any elaborate Atma-Saadhanaa or regimen. The mind will then be ready to firmly establish itself in the teaching of the Guru and Realisation will be almost automatic. The Acharya has not taken all the pains to elaborate the methodlogy of the Sadhana ChatushhTayaM to such a highly evolved person. If we understand him right, it is only this: A pure mind and the capability to be one-pointed are surely basic to a certain extent; with that basic equipment, one should read the shastras and enter the kingly path of the Saadhanaa. Only then he can make real progress. Otherwise he will only be touching the fringes and have a false feeling that he knows everything. The Buddhists said that they have opened the gates to all; but what happened thereafter was seen by the Acharya. That is why he prescribed that only those with preliminary qualifications can make real progress in Atma-Sadhanaa. There are people who say: “Every one is fit to carry on advaita-saadhanaa. No prerequisites are necessary. After all it is about learning about the truth of oneself by oneself. Why are qualifications necessary to become ourselves? It is enough to have the urge to know oneself. By the tempo of that urge, once we discard our mind then that is all that is needed to have Realisation. Self-Realisation is every one’s birthright. No qualifications need to be prescribed”. Maybe some of these people who proclaim this are really true jnAnis who know. And some who follow them even if they be young, be a householder, be in business-like professions, be a westerner, could have done the Atma Vichara with real fervour and single-minded dedication and could have obtained clarity of jnAna. But even among these who speak of such things and who listen to such things there may be possibly one or two percent who have really attained the Realisation. They read a lot of Vedanta topics, they are smart, and they have thought for long about Atman and the Vedantic knowledge; and they can construct beautiful arguments for what they say, present papers, submit theses and so on. When one looks at all these one is amazed and one feels that they are really Enlightened JnAnis. But in truth, among such talkers and claimers there may be one in thousand who have really SEEN what they claim to have seen! The real ones who have SEEN it usually don’t talk about it, like Dakshinamurti. For the welfare of the world (*lokAnugrahArthaM*) the Lord Isvara Himself prompts a few like our Acharya to talk and write about Atma Vidya. Certainly there may be rare ones who may have directly obtained Realisation, without really renouncing in due manner, due manner meaning, proper observance of svadharma and then of bhakti yoga, and then embarking upon the deep study of Atma-VidyA. But they cannot say that others also can do what they have done. What they have obtained is by their prior samskara and that has given them the necessary spiritual qualification in their previous lives itself and in this life they have the Grace of God in full. Such people are not the ordinary run of people. Maybe the Acharya himself would give them only very special treatment for spiritual uplift. But when the Acharya writes or talks to all humanity for their general good, he writes only keeping in mind the ordinary run of people and therefore he talks about karma yoga and bhakti yoga as prerequisites to Atma SadhanA. Accordingly he has chalked out the four-fold regimen of Sadhana-chatushhTayaM. First with a purified and one pointed mind study the Shastras, find out what is eternal and what is ephemeral, use discretion to accept and reject, and go on until the state of ‘mumukshutA’ being the only breath. This itself is not the end of it. The final end of all this graduation through bachelor’s and master’s degrees ends when the PhD of ‘MumukshutA’ leads him on to the final Realisation. (To be Continued) PraNAms to all students of advaita. PraNAms to the Maha-Swamigal. profvk Prof. V. Krishnamurthy Latest on my website: A conversation on the Concept of God in Hinduism. http://www.geocities.com/profvk/VK2/ConceptofGOD.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2005 Report Share Posted September 21, 2005 Sir, You hvae said in the mail - ************************************************ First you purify your mind; make your mind capable of one-pointedness. Graduate from this and then come to me for admission to my college. Then you can step into the process of Enquiry into the Atman. ************************************************ This "Graduation" itself might take more than one lifespans. So how a person is to know whether he has already completed the graduation or not. Because the person can not start everything from scratch in the current life. If he does it will take few more lifetimes. And he will never be able to start the PG. So how can we measure our efforts from our past lives and gauge our level in the current life? Regards Madhav Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 advaitin, Madhav Mundlye <madhavm_99> wrote: > Sir, > > You hvae said in the mail - > ************************************************ > First you purify your mind; make your mind capable of one- pointedness. Graduate from this and then come to me for admission to my college. Then you can step into the process of Enquiry into the Atman. > > ************************************************ > > This "Graduation" itself might take more than one lifespans. So how a person is to know whether he has already completed the graduation or not. Because the person can not start everything from scratch in the current life. If he does it will take few more lifetimes. And he will never be able to start the PG. > > > > So how can we measure our efforts from our past lives and gauge our level in the current life? Namaste, Madhav-ji Sorry that I allowed your question so long without responding to it. Well, there is no use trying to measure our efforts from our past lives. We can feel it in our bones when we try to concentrate or when we try to curb our anger and other passions. Our business is only to keep trying for the spiritual ascent, not to judge or grade ourselves. The maturity will come of its own accord by God's Grace. But we should not slacken our efforts or fail in our performance of duties and obligations. PraNAms to all advaitins. profvk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.