Guest guest Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 Namaste Chittaranjanji, You were thinking of Albertus Magnus: (from Britannica) The History of Western Philosophy Albertus Magnus. The achievement of the Dominican friar Albertus Magnus (c.1200-80) was of vital importance for the development ofmedieval philosophy. A man of immense erudition and intellectual curiosity, he was one of the first to recognize the true value of the newly translated Greco-Arabic scientific and philosophical literature. Everything he considered valuable in it, he included in his encyclopaedic writings. He set out to teach this literature to his contemporaries and in particular to make the philosophy of Aristotle, whom he considered to be the greatest philosopher, understandable to them. He also proposed to write original works in order to complete what was lacking in the Aristotelian system. In no small measure, the triumph of Aristotelianism in the 13th century can be attributed to him. Albertus' observations and discoveries in the natural sciences advanced botany, zoology, and mineralogy. In philosophy he was less original and creative than his famous pupil Thomas Aquinas. Albertus produced a synthesis of Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism, blending together the philosophies of Aristotle, Avicenna, and Ibn Gabirol, and, among Christians, Augustine and Pseudo-Dionysius. 1994-1999 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Best Wishes, Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2005 Report Share Posted November 29, 2005 Namaste Sri Michaelji, advaitin, ombhurbhuva <ombhurbhuva@e...> wrote: > > Namaste Chittaranjanji, > You were thinking of Albertus Magnus: (from Britannica) > The History of Western Philosophy > Albertus Magnus. > > The achievement of the Dominican friar Albertus Magnus > (c.1200-80) was of vital importance for the development of > medieval philosophy. A man of immense erudition and > intellectual curiosity, he was one of the first to > recognize the true value of the newly translated > Greco-Arabic scientific and philosophical literature. > Everything he considered valuable in it, he included in > his encyclopaedic writings. He set out to teach this > literature to his contemporaries and in particular to make > the philosophy of Aristotle, whom he considered to be the > greatest philosopher, understandable to them. He also > proposed to write original works in order to complete what > was lacking in the Aristotelian system. In no small > measure, the triumph of Aristotelianism in the 13th > century can be attributed to him. While it is true that Albertus Magnus was the first (in medieval Europe) to recognise the value of Aristotle, the light that his pupil Thomas Aquinas shed on Aristotle's writings eclipsed the works of Magnus. Indeed there was a saying in those days which had become a kind a maxim: "Sine Thoma Aristotles mutus esset: without Thomas, Aristotle would be silent". Aquinas re-interpreted Aristotle's writings, deviating from the extant commentaries on them by the Arab philosophers, Averrois and Avicenna, and showed that Aristotelian philosophy was not dissonant with Christian Theology. He was initially condemned for his efforts, but as we all know he went on to become one of the great canonical figures of the Church. Warm regards, Chittaranjan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.