Guest guest Posted February 14, 2006 Report Share Posted February 14, 2006 respecvted ganesanga;ru, Have u read Yoga Va:sishtam ? Please do me a favour. There is a lot of mentioning here and there about vasana:s. could u please give me all the verses where it occurre? On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 Ganesan Sankarraman wrote : > > >Madathil Rajendran Nair <madathilnair wrote: My dear Sankararamanji, > > Apologies for my intrusion into your dialogue with Anandaji. > > To summarize, you have accused Bhagawan Ramana of being irrational! > Can't help saying this after reading your comparative analysis of > Shri Atmananda and Bhagwan Ramana. > > Respected sir, > My use of the word irrational is only by way of paying tribute to adavaita and is not an insinuation. I did not want to use the word supra-rational which would have been alright; but I was worried that this had the connotation of becoming, some objectification, which is surely against the advaitic thought, and even in any genuine search for truth through any other world view, when the individual finds that life calls the bluff to rationality, reason and logic, all these things having been left far behind in the matter of coming upon, rather to be that which is. I have great respect for both the great masters. There is a verse in yogavasishta to the effect: "Study this scripture with devotion. you will surely come upon truth. If you find this scripture not suited to your predisposition, study some other scripture or pursue some other path to free yourself from this dreadful samsara. > yours etc > Sankarraman > > > >Relax. Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses! > > > > > > >Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. >Advaitin List Archives available at: http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ >To Post a message send an email to : advaitin >Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages > > > Links > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 bhuvan eswar chilukuri <bhuvaneswarc wrote: respecvted ganesanga;ru, Have u read Yoga Va:sishtam ? Please do me a favour. There is a lot of mentioning here and there about vasana:s. could u please give me all the verses where it occurre? On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 Ganesan Sankarraman wrote : > > > Apropos your query, it is to be noted that Yoga Vasishta is full of the ideas of vasanas, and not here and there to be specified. You may read the translation done by Swamy Venkatesananda, which goes by the name, 'Supreme Yoga'. But the Swamiji has been influenced greatly by the modern terminologies of J.Krishnamurthy, such as conditioning, psychological memory, psychological becoming, choiceless awareness, which he freely uses in expounding the philosophy of Vasishta, even though he has not acknowledged the fact. The Swamy has met Krishnamurthy and held talks with him which are available in the book, "Awakening of Intelligence". There are further two versions, one containing the selections from one B.l.Aytreya, who has done tremendous research on this scripture dating it back to the period of Sankara, another containing the philosophy of this work alongwith the stories, both these having been done by one Samvit, who has simply adopted the terminology, "Choiceless Awareness," of J.K, in explaining the thought of Vasishta, no acknowledgment having been made in this case also. There is another translation by one R.M.Hari, this being an English translation from a Hindi version from a Sufi Master, which is very original, coming from self-realization. There is also a free rendering by one K.Narayanaswamy Iyer, having been published by Theosophical Foundation. But, of course, the oldest version is by Mitra, which is a prodigious work, all the thirty thousand verses having been rendered in English. This is in a very archaic language, and would not suit the purpose of the readers, even though the author is very sincere. The attribution of this work to Valmiki is sheer myth, the author being anonymous having resorted to this nom-de-plume, which shows his greatness, the author sublating himself in the grandeur of the thought. According to professor Dasgupta, the author of this work, an unknown saint, belongs to the period of Gaudapada or Nagarjuna. But then the question arises as to why Sankara has not made mention of this work, when Vidyaranya has done. Aitreya attributes this to the fact of the work not having derived the authority of tradition. But all these things are irrelevant. This work talks of nonduality in unmincing terms, there being a direct hit, without resort to all logic, dialectics and polemics. Bhaghavan Ramana has very much recommended this work to be read, while paradoxically Ramakrishna is very averse to this work, having specifically stated that house-holders should not read this. That is why the monks of the Ramakrishna order have not brought out any translation of this work in spite of their great contribution to traditional advaitic works. But Ramana does not make this type of discrimination. Personally, I feel that the translations of Venkatesanada and Samvit are most excellent in spite of the plagiarism involved. R.M.Hari's version is very spiritual. Sankarraman Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.