Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 The Teacher and the Taught: Bhagavad Gita is the song celestial. It was sung by the Lord of the entire universe who took birth in a human form to redeem the mankind, to the blessed couple, Vasudeva and Devaki. The teaching was to Arjuna who was pure hearted one (arjunaH means white, which stands for purity, anagha, a sinless one) and through Arjuna to the whole mankind. In Bhagavad Gita Krishna reveals the secret of His avataara, incarnation in human form to uplift Dharma. Whenever people forget their divine origin and their sanaatana dharma or Vedic dharma, the degradation of the society occurs, materialism prevails. The standards of the society are measured in terms of materialistic possessions than on spiritual development. There is nothing wrong in possessing but something wrong in depriving others that deserve the basic amenities of life. In a materialistic society desires for sensuous pleasures increase, people become greedy to satiate their desires, and dharma is compromised. People resort to compromising means to achieve the ends they want. The four-fold human pursuit, purushhaartha (dharma, artha, kaama and moksha) are forgotten to give importance to only acquiring wealth, artha, and fulfilling sensuous desires, kaama. Dharma or righteousness which is essential to maintain the universe in equilibrium (dhAranAt iti dharmaH – that which supports) declines. When dharma declines, Bhagavaan has to take appropriate action to restore it. The purpose of avataara or incarnation is not just to punish the culprits, which solves only a temporal problem, but also to redeem the masses by teaching Brahma vidya, which helps generations to come. Getopadesha stands therefore a monumental contribution of MahAbhArata times for the humankind. Its utility for generations to come is unquestionable because of its universal application. The teacher is a universal being, and the teaching is an eternal flow of knowledge of Vedas and it was brought down to a dynamic earthly man in downtown (pArtha). Krishna is a universal personality, loved and revered by all, from innocent children to matured sages, king of all kings while refusing to own any kingdom for himself, yet with kings and emperors bowing down to him, who is the very back bone of the Hindu culture. He permeates every part of the Hindu society, in every form of art, in every form of Indian dance, Indian music, Indian paintings to Indian literature. His childhood pranks to his adult plays, his mature and calculated political moves to restore the goodness in the society and to establish dharma, are all sung in many ways and in many languages, from lullabies to Gitagovindas. His presence reverberates in every segment of the Hindu society. Hence, Bhagavad Gita forms the very essence of Hindu culture, the pinnacle of Hindu thought with divine signature and with universal application. While teaching, Krishna uses a universal pronoun, yah, meaning whoever he may be he who, that is whoever follows the teaching will reach Me, the universal goal. Therefore, Gita should be understood in the spirit of that teaching, application to all, without any reservations, without any prejudices, without any privileges. It confirms to the Vedic teaching, yet adopting the language and meaning to suite a rational human being. Bhagavad Gita stands as one of the three pillars of SanAtana dharma, sustaining and supporting it. Many AchAryas in the past and many scholars in the present have written bhAshyAs and commentaries, each one from their perspective, each one claiming that their interpretation is correct, some even claiming that their interpretation is ‘as it is’ compared to those of others, yet all converge in essence, in directing the human being towards the pinnacle of evolution, each in their own way. I present here my own understanding, without claiming it to be objective, based on the assimilation of the teaching that I received, particularly from my teacher, H.H. Swami Chinmayanandaji. He traveled until his last breath from one end of the world to the other, as Krishna’s ambassador, preaching Bhagavad Gita, in the form of Gita Jnaana Yagnas, in the language that people like me can understand and appreciate the age-old science of manual of self-unfoldment. His last Gita Jnaana Yagna was in Washington D.C., the capital of the United States, where he delivered thundering discourses on Gita, sitting on a dais, while his heart was functioning only one fourth of its capacity. He gave us the last drop of his blood in trying to educate us, and in making us see the beauty and grandeur of the vision of a realized person, sthitaprajna. Gita was his speech, Gita was his action, nay, Gita was his life. Gurudev’s vision and accomplishments are monumental in educating and propagating to the rational intellects the logic of spirituality packed in Gita and Upanishads, in building Sandeepany SadhanAlayas to train the young rational minded budding Krishnas by providing intensive courses on Brahma vidya, in formulating Vedantic study groups, in popularizing the teaching even in vernacular languages to masses of India and abroad, in providing Gita chanting competitions for children of all ages, in building Chinmaya vidhyAlayas where culture is brought into the classrooms, in redirecting the energetic youth to yoga of action and contemplation, in building old-age retirement communities where retirees can devote to the scriptural study and contemplation, thus penetrating every fabric of the society in every city and town. Gurudev taught us inside as well as outside the class room, watching and correcting every misstep that we took towards understanding and applying this science of spirituality, with full of love and compassion. With full of gratitude and humility, I proceed to churn my understanding of Gita as my offerings at his lotus feet. Role of a Teacher and the Scriptures: The spiritual journey involves essentially two stages of evolution. The first stage involves refining ones likes and dislikes expressed through ones desires, and the next stage involves internalizing the teaching until it becomes one with the seeker. Refinement of desires are refinement of thought patterns that involves decreasing the quantity, changing the quality and redirecting them towards the higher goal. Everyone is born with likes and dislikes or vAsanas which are due to the impressions left by egocentric actions in the past life or past lives. These are called together as prArabda karma. In the process of growing, one acquires new ones called AgAmi karma, which can either be exhausted in this life or put into one’s total account called sanchita karma. VAsanas express as desires at the intellect level, agitations at the mental level and egocentric actions at the body level, which in turn leaves or reinforces one’s vAsanas. Thus eternal cycle is set in motion consisting of birth, actions and birth. In animal forms, vAsanas only are exhausted without acquiring new ones, since they do not act with ego. On the other hand, human being is provided with intellect to make a choice. Hence he has the capacity to refine his vasAnas by refining his desires. For refinement, one should understand the mechanics of the processes involved. Desire for any an object, for a place or environment, or for people is only to gain happiness from them. Hence longing for happiness is root cause for desire. Yet, happiness is not with any object, place or people. In the fulfillment of desires, our minds become calm and contended. In those moments of happiness, we are back to ourselves, where our minds feel adequate with themselves, until of course other desires prop up due to pressure of vAsanas. Craving for objects, therefore, is not for objects sake, but for happiness sake. What we are truly seeking is happiness and not the object per se. ‘Aatmanastu kaamaaya sarvam priyam bhavati’ says the shruti. Recognition of this fact is the first step in the evolution. Hence, desire for happiness manifests as desire for objects. Next to understand is the desire for happiness is not desire for an object since there is no happiness in any object, but desire for myself whose nature is happiness. At this stage, desires for all objects are redirected to one desire and that is the desire to know oneself. He becomes a jignAsu, seeker of knowledge. To know myself is to see myself by myself. ‘dyaanena Aatmani pasyati kaschit AtmAnam AtmanA’ ‘by contemplation, one sees oneself in oneself by oneself’, says Krishna. Since I am the subject and not an object for me to see myself, I need a means to know myself. It is similar to the fact that I need a mirror to see my face. Mirror does not bring my face but is only an instrument that reflects my face so that I can see my face. When I am standing in front of the mirror, what I am seeing is not the mirror not the image but myself reflected in the mirror. If I see a black patch in the image, I use a towel to wipe my face than try to wipe the image. Without a mirror, it is impossible to see my face. Similarly, to know myself, 'the subject I', I need to use Vedanta mirror or darshana. Vedanta to act as darshana I need proper understanding of the scriptures and that is possible only with the help of a competent teacher. Hence Vedanta says ‘arE dRishTavaya, shrotavyaH, mantavyaH, nidhidhyAsitavyaH’ – one has to see oneself, for that one has to listen from the scripture from a competent teacher, shravaNam, and reflect on the teaching until there are no more doubts, mananam, and contemplate on the teaching till the knowledge is internalized, nidhidhyAsanam. Hence, when Krishna said that by contemplation one sees oneself in oneself by oneself, contemplation involves internalization of the teachings of the Vedanta. Shravanam involves a systematic, consistent study of Vedantic scriptures for a length of time under a competent teacher. A competent teacher is one who was a competent student, who learned from a competent teacher. Thus, there is a guruparampara or lineage of a teacher to a student, all the way pointing to the Lord Krishna himself. Hence, Krishna is called ‘jagat guru’, world teacher. Krishna says tad viddhi praNipAtena pariprashnena sevayA| upadekshyanti te jnAnam jnAninaH tatva darshinaH|| Approach a teacher with complete humility and respect by surrendering to him, and asking him with appropriate questions to learn the nature of the reality. The teacher in turn will import that knowledge to such a student, since he himself learned from his teacher by approaching in the same way. >From this, it follows that Vedanta is pramaaNa or the means of knowledge. Since it is not an objective knowledge but knowledge about one self, Vedanta acts like mirror, darpaNa or darshana, when it is tuned in the hands of a competent teacher. Thus, two things are essential; one is the teacher and the second is Vedanta shaastra, and the teacher is such that he has learned himself from another competent teacher. In gaining the knowledge, one should have complete ‘shraddhaa’, which is loosely translated as faith. Shankara defines shraddhaa as ‘shAtrasya guruvAkyasya satya budhyAvadhAraNA’ – shraddhA is the faith in the truth expounded in the scriptures as interpreted by the teacher. Thus, scripture and the teacher together come as one package. Therefore, a right teacher is one who points to the scriptural authority as interpreted by his teacher and not to himself as an authority. Hence, a guruparampara, lineage of teachers is emphasized in the scriptural study. There is also a sampradAyam or tradition of teaching the scripture and is emphasized since teaching is very subtle and requires a competent teacher who can communicate the knowledge properly. Thus, Bhagavad Gita and upanishads have to be learned through a teacher. Inquiry and knowledge: It is important to understand the nature of the self-inquiry or Brahman-inquiry, and the knowledge that one gains because of the inquiry. There are many miss conceptions about saadhana, role of Vedanta, and self-realization or Brahman realization. Brahman cannot be ‘object’ for inquiry, since any object is limited by definition. In the beginning of the study, convenience it is treated as an object for analysis. That which is infinite and all pervading self-existent and self-consciousness entity cannot be objectified. Brahman inquiry has to lead to inquiry of oneself, the subject, I, which is also self-conscious and self-existent principle. It cannot be separate from Brahman since there cannot be divisions in existence or in consciousness. This identity has to be recognized by inquiry into the nature of Brahman or nature of myself. This is exactly what Vedanta darshana provides, if it is correctly explained by a competent teacher. People have a misconception that one has to experience this identity or this state of oneness. It is not the lack of advaitic experience, but it is the lack of advatic understanding since in deep sleep state every one experiences the advaita. It is the knowledge of the experience that is needed. In addition, any understanding is done by buddhi, since that is the only instrument of knowledge that we have. The truth is advaita. However, understanding of the advaitic nature of the truth has to take place only in Buddhi. This is the reason, why study of the scriptures and contemplation on the truths expounded in the scriptures by buddhi are what is implied by dhyAnam or nidhidhyAsana. Some people say this is all intellectual and the truth is beyond the intellect and we need to sit and meditate,the study of scriptures is useful only up to some point, etc. When Vedanta say tat vijnAnasva, it implies that it is to be known through inquiry using scriptural study and internalization of that knowledge by contemplation. It is not Atma or Brahman that has misconceptions. They are immaculately pure. The misconceptions are in the mind and it is the mind that needs to realize that ‘aham brahmaasmi’ ‘I am that Brahman’. Brahman, which is infinite, includes the Buddhi that has the wrong notions about oneself. In the realization of ‘aham bramhAsmi’ in the buddhi all wrong notions about oneself drops out and replaced by the recognition that I am Brahman raises – where? – in the Buddhi itself. Hence it is the not the experience that I am longing for, it is the removal of misconceptions about myself in the buddhi to be done by appropriate inquiry using Vedanta as a tool. ‘Truth is beyond the intellect’, ‘one has to go beyond the intellect’, ‘I do not want to be trapped in the intellectual stuff’ are the statements people make. 'Truth is beyond the intellect' is alright but misconceptions are in the intellect that need to be removed. These cannot be removed by doing japa ‘ aham brahmAsmi’ or ‘who am I’ etc, but using Vedanta darshana to see clearly, who I am. There are no other direct paths for this. When misconceptions drop out in the awakening of the knowledge, the ever shining truth is recognized in the intellect. That truth is beyond the intellect in the sense that it includes everything including the intellect, since it is infinite ever-existent, self-illuminating principle. Since the misconceptions are in the intellect, realization of one intellect does not mean the realization by other intellects. Hence, saadhana has to be done by each individual whose buddhi is separate, and whose misconceptions in each buddhi are different from those of others. Each student has to approach an appropriate teacher or is led to an appropriate teacher to gain that knowledge. ‘mana eva manushyAnAm kAraNam bandha moksha yOH|’ - mind is responsible for both bondage and liberations’ says manusmruti. The fact of the matter is even when I am ignorant; I am that sat-chit-ananda – that ever-shining eternal existent principle. However, due to misconceptions in the intellect, and identifying with the intellect I am the intellect, I take myself to be limited and ignorant. Question that is raised is by intellectual understanding, can one realize the truth. The answer is yes, provided as JK puts it, it is an understanding as an understanding as a fact, and not as understanding as understanding as a thought. To give a simple and baser example, I understand that I am a man. Since childhood, I was brought up with this knowledge. It is an understanding as a fact and not as a thought. It is not a japa that I have to do all the time that ‘I am man’ and ‘I am man’ that brings out this knowledge that I am man or repeat, ‘who am I?’, ‘who am I?’ etc. It is an assimilated understanding based on the teaching received from parents and other elders, when I was a child. That knowledge remains with me in the background, in all my transactions. Swami Chinmayandaji used to teach this in a story form. There was one, Mr. Jones, who suddenly got a notion that he is rat and not a man. Whenever he sees a cat, he used to hide in a closet, since he is rat and not a man. His wife noticing his problem took him to a psychologist and after many sittings and repeating many times that ‘I am man and not a rat’, he understood that he is a man and not a rat. After paying doctors fees and going back home, he returned back rushing to the doctor, gasping for his breath. The doctor asked – “what is the problem, Mr. Jones? I thought you understood that you are a man and not a rat”. Mr. Jones replied, “ Yes, Doctor, I understand very well that I am a man and not a rat. But what I am afraid is whether the cat in my house knows that I am man and not a rat.” There is difference in just intellectual understanding but factual understanding. NidhidhyAsana helps to internalize the knowledge gained by shravaNa and mananam. Thus, study of the scriptures and contemplating on the truth expounded in the scriptures are essential for factual understanding. Pressure of vAsanas formed through many lives, where the notions about oneself are deep rooted, obstruct the factual understanding to take place. Hence, chitta suddhi or purification of the mind is emphasized before the study of the scriptures. Chitta suddhi can be accomplished effectively through karma yoga, as emphasized by Krishna. With this background we enter into the study of Bhagavad Gita. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2006 Report Share Posted February 20, 2006 post number 38277 Sadaji, your Glowing tribute to Poojya Gurudev Swami Chinmayananda really touched my heart. Yes , the Jnana yagna started by Gurudevji is now ably carried out by his successor Swami Tejomayanandaji who visited Washington DCc recently. i happened to listen to some of his lectures on 'jnana sara' ( along the lines of Sri Ramana's upadesa sara)and i was simply overwhelmed on hearing the 'devotional' rendering of vedantic truths. Swamiji's child like innocence and sense of humor is very appealing and he is truly an ambassador of Goodwill for the Chinmaya Mission.Swamiji himself humbly admits that He is not in his 'gurudeva's shoes ' but at his lotus feet! what ananya guru bhakti! I was so impressed by him that on my recent trip to Orlando, Florida , i enrolled my two grand kids ( aged 3 and 5 respectively) in Chinmaya mission sunday classes - my gifts to them for their spiritual growth and devlopment. i am also delighted to note that you mentioned about Guru Paramapara - this is very important. In this context, i would like to recall a verse on Advaita Guru Parampara nArAyaNam. padmabhuvam. vasishTham. Saktim. ca tatputra parASaram. ca vyAsam. Sukam. gauDapadam. mahAntam. govindayogIndram athAsya Sishyam. | SrI Sam.karAcAryam athAsya padmapAdam. ca hastAmalakam. ca Sishyam. tam. toTakam. vArttikakAramanyAn asmad gurUn santatamAnatosmi || sadASiva samArambhAm. SankarAcArya madhyamAm. asmadAcArya paryantAm. vande guru paramparAm. || These are the advaita guru paramparA verses, which salute the prominent gurus of advaita, starting from nArAyaNa through Sankara and his disciples, upto the AcAryas of today. It is typical of advaita that the first guru is called nArAyaNa (vishNu) in the first verse and sadASiva (Siva) in the second. The paramparA thus lists: nArAyaNa padmabhuva (brahmA) vasishTha Sakti parASara vyAsa Suka gauDapAda govinda bhagavatpAda SankarAcArya padmapAda, hastAmalaka, toTaka, sureSvara (vArttikakAra), and others (anyA:). (http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~krsna/AdvaitaVedanta/history.htm ) When i read messages on the Advaitin Message Board, i can immediately feel the presence of a 'guru' in some of the members posts and i can also kind of figure out which lineage they belong to! smile! is it not amazing how the same 'advaitic truth' is presented in so many different ways by members ? something to think about ! in recent times , i have been particularly impressed by the writings of Sri subbuji specially his posts on Sri Dakshinamurthy stotram, and i could immediately sense that he is a disciple of a guru from the great adi shankara lineage! please correct me, subbuji, if i am wrong! To learn Advaita, you need to approach a guru from the advaitic lineage; a dwaita guru may help you to see the contradictions in advaita just as an advaitic guru can help you see the contradictions in dwaita philosophy . However, in the ultimate analysis , you can not learn Shankara's advaita philosophy from Sri Ramanujacharya or learn Dwaita from sri Adi Shankara! Imagine going to a Kuchipudi teacher to learn Bharatanatyam or to a Bharatanatyam teacher to learn Kuchipudi ! WHAT A ROYAL MIX UP THAT WOULD BE! AS SRI KRISHNA HIMSELF SAYS IN THE SRIMAD BHAGWAT GITA evam parampara-praptam imam rajarsayo viduh sa kaleneha mahata yogo nastah parantapa (CH 4, VERSE 2) SRILA PRABHUPADA'S TRANSLATION This supreme science was thus received through the chain of disciplic succession, and the saintly kings understood it in that way. But in course of time the succession was broken, and therefore the science as it is appears to be lost. It is now important to see what Sri KRISHNA SAYS IN THE NEXT VERSE sa evayam maya te 'dya yogah proktah puratanah bhakto 'si me sakha ceti rahasyam hy etad uttamam (CH 4 , VERSE 3) That very ancient science of the relationship with the Supreme is today told by Me to you because you are My devotee as well as My friend; therefore you can understand the transcendental mystery of this science. It is important to note that not only should the Guru be competent , the disciple should also be 'fit' to receive this knowledge ! this is called 'adhikaratvam' - otherwise it is like 'sevidan kaathil sanghu oothrapole' ( that is blowing the conch in to the deafman's ears)! Sadaji, please continue blowing the 'panchjanya' conch shell of Sri Krishna THROUGH THIS CELESTIAL SONG OF srimad Bhagwat gita and on hearing the sound of which all the negative energies will vanish! Hari Aum! Vande Guru Paramparam! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2006 Report Share Posted February 20, 2006 Dhyanasaraswatiji - My praNaams to you. Thanks for your kind encouragement. Yes, Guruparampara is important. Swamiji's mark is evident in all mission activities. Recently Swami Paramaarthanandaji who was the product of the Sandeepany Saadhanalaya of Bombay, was paying tributes to the Gurus, acknowledging the vision of Gurudev in establishing the Sandeepany Saadhanaalayas to train Brahmachaaries. Now there are many many swamis and aachaarayas throughout India and in many centers around the world, some swamis working in the mission and some working out side the mission, yet passing on the knowledge of the Vedas to the next generation. Many of us gruhasta-s cannot go to a monastery to learn. Because of his vision, the monasteries are coming to the people to teach Vedanta. Currently Swami Tejomayanandaji is traning a new batch of students who will be the teachers for the future. What a vision! I do not know how to express my gratitude. Words fail to express the feelings. It is said that because of merits accumulated from many lives one is led to proper teacher that too an advaita master, as you noted. In AvadhUta Gita Bhagavaan Dattaatreya says - Iswaraannugrahat eva pumsaam advaita vaasanaa| Only by the grace of god one gets the inclination to advaita vaasana. Otherwise, it is so storage that a person born to a great vishisTaadvaitin gets exposed to J. Krishnamurthy's teachings, rejects all scriptures, but eventually is led to an advaitic master. His leela is incredible. I was reading the biography of Anandamayi maa, the Kerala lady who was born to a fisherman. What an incredible story. I could not contain my tears as I was reading. How the Lord takes up an innocent girl, ignorant by all standards, born in small village in Kerala, discriminated by her own family for being darker than them, and shapers up into a gigantic personality that the whole world honors. Kerala and the Bhaarat are blessed by these giants who lead the nation by their own lives. How much of punyam we must have done in our past lives to be born in such a country that produces such giants. I cannot but acknowledge the Moderators of this list, particularly Shree Ram Chandran, who had the farsightedness to start this advaitin list serve and maintain it with enthusiasm, in spite of many odds and criticisms. Other wise how can we communicate, discuss and grow, sitting miles apart yet reaching each other at an incredible speed. My PraNaams Shree Rama Chandran and to all others moderators who work in union to provide a vehicle for all of us to learn and grow. It is my good fortune to be included as part of this discussion group centered on advaita. Hari OM! Sadananda --- dhyanasaraswati <dhyanasaraswati wrote: > post number 38277 > > Sadaji, > > your Glowing tribute to Poojya Gurudev Swami Chinmayananda really > touched my heart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 21, 2006 Report Share Posted February 21, 2006 ref 30313 Sadaji observes : ( Otherwise, it is so storage that a person born to a great vishisTaadvaitin gets exposed to J. Krishnamurthy's teachings, rejects all scriptures, but eventually is > led to an advaitic master. His leela is incredible. ) who is this great vishistadvaitin that is being refrred to ? Who is the son ? just curious! smile! Sadaji comments : (I was reading the biography of Anandamayi maa, the Kerala lady who was born to a fisherman. What an incredible story. I could not contain my tears as I was reading. How the Lord takes up an innocent girl, ignorant by all standards, born in small village in Kerala,........... ) Yes, the punyabhumi of Malayala pradesham has produced many saints including Adi Shankara, Narayana guru, Melputhur Narayana Bhattatiri, who composed the 'Narayeeniyam' . Mata Amritananana mayee whose very name means "Mother of Absolute Bliss", Is Present day Kerala's 'gift' to the modern day world. I had the good fortune of meeting her thrice in washington dc while she was conducting a world tour. She is called affectionately as 'Ammachi' by her devotees . This hugging saint also initiated me by whispering a 'bija' mantra into my ears while giving me the best hug only a Mother Can give! She is jagat-janani! Sadaji, Ammachi is not only a jnana .bhakti yogi , she is also a karma yogi par excellance. Her organization's recent efforts in the area of Tsunami relief efforts are commendable. Not only that , Ammachi and her team of volunteers helped in a big way during the recent 'Katrina' HAVOC in new Orleans! Sadaji, may i share something with you ?- most saints come from very humble backgrounds. Kabir das was a weaver. So was Thiruvalluvar. Jesus himself was the son of a carpenter. Strangely , Sainthood has something to do with 'humility' and 'compassion' ! This fisherwoman's daughter was therefore able to feel the 'pain' and 'siuffering ' of the millions of people affected by the Tsunami disaster in the coastal areas and no wonder 'AMMACHI' rose to the Occassion and saved these men and women from more suffering by her magnificent relief efforts - something even a Government cannot do in such a short span of time! one last point. I join you in congratulating Sri Ramji for starting this list and also maintiaing the 'high' standards. Criticism and praise are part of life and one should know how to handle both. Smile! Remember, the 'thorn' is there to protect the rose! On another note , all the nine moderators on the list are like 'nine' gems of the King Vikramaditya's court. Of late, we are also enjoying the 'knowledgeble' presence of Sri Ananda wood .i Have a 'sneaking' admiration for him and his soulful poetry. Nairji has always has the ability to present different points of view on the same subject and his posts make excellent reading. His recent exposition of 'shradda' is a case in point. Of course, Professor VKji has always proved that bhakti and jnana are the 'twin' eyes of Vedanta through his many discourses ! Sunderji 's is the invisible hand that guides us all the time to see 'vedanta' through 'divya' chaksu with wonderful reference materilals! Gregji is our 'mauna guru but very effective at the sametime! However, sadaji - you cannot ignore the wonderful members on this list who through their nummerous contributions make this list the most 'coveted' one! Some names come readily to mind- chitta, felipe , subbuji, sankaraji, rajeshji and of course our inimitable michaelji among a host of others whose names i cannot readily recall! Can you imagine a temple without the devotees? can you imagine a congregation without an audience? Similarly, it is the members who make or mar the list! so , let us take a moment to acknowledge their valuable contributions too ! love and regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.