Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 advaitin, V Subrahmanian <subrahmanian_v wrote: > > Pranams to all. The question of varna system being different from the present caste system did not arise to me. The traditional school in which I was trained did not seek to make such a distinction. Namaste Sri Subbu: I may agree with you if your statement contains the condition that some aspects of Varna System and present day caste system have similarites. Both an elephant and a donkey have 4 legs, a tail, and a body. Can we make the conclusion that they are the same? Identical twins may be considered equal at the time of their birth but when they grow from childhood to adulthood, they acquire distinct characteristics (Gunas). There is famous saying to the effect that the purity of the water is determined not through its origin: the greatness of a Rishi is also not determined on basis of his birth origin. I do come from a traditional Vaideeka family but I will not accept that a child born in lower caste is inferior to my own child. I believe that all Children are divine and they are His gift. Lord Krishna in Bhagavad Gita declares in chapter 10, verse 30 that "Praklad, the demon by birth is Me!" Warmest regards, Ram Chandran Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 advaitin, "Ram Chandran" <ramvchandran wrote: > > > I do come from a traditional Vaideeka family but I will not accept > that a child born in lower caste is inferior to my own child. I > believe that all Children are divine and they are His gift. Lord > Krishna in Bhagavad Gita declares in chapter 10, verse 30 > that "Praklad, the demon by birth is Me!" > > Warmest regards, > > Ram Chandran > Namaste, However you are conscious of your caste status as a Vaideeka obviously.This may be part of the problem. Taling about things on here may help but as Freud said; 'talking is for converting human mysery into ordinary human unhappiness.....ONS..Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 Namaste Sri Tony: When I say that I come from a Vaideeka family, I am just informing that my father's profession is Vaideekam - a person responsible for conducting Vedic Karmas. I can't inherit my father's profession by just being his son. Please understand, that because someone is born to a Vaideeka family doesn't provide the credentials to become a Vaideeka - he/she needs to undergo over 10 years of Vedic schooling to master the Vedic mantras and the procedures of conducting Vedic rituals (Samskaras). Those who possess the qualifications and undergone the necessary training to conduct Vedic karmas can only become a Vaideekar. In Western countries, when someone says that "he/she belongs to a blacksmith family," that does not imply as a reference to a caste! Similarly, my statement that , I belong to a vaideeka family, should be understood appropriately. Your response just confirms how westerners like you are misinformed about the Hindu Varna Dharma system. I hope my clarification helps you to clear your doubts, regards, Ram Chandran Note: Most of our problems are mostly due to our igonorance of other cultures and other religions. Can you please explain your quotation and its relevance in this context. thanks in advance. advaitin, "Tony OClery" <aoclery wrote: > > > > Namaste, > > However you are conscious of your caste status as a Vaideeka > obviously.This may be part of the problem. Taling about things on > here may help but as Freud said; 'talking is for converting human > mysery into ordinary human unhappiness.....ONS..Tony. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 advaitin, "Ram Chandran" <ramvchandran wrote: > > > Ram Chandran > > Note: Most of our problems are mostly due to our igonorance of other > cultures and other religions. Can you please explain your quotation and > its relevance in this context. thanks in advance. > > > advaitin, "Tony OClery" <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > However you are conscious of your caste status as a Vaideeka > > obviously.This may be part of the problem. Taling about things on > > here may help but as Freud said; 'talking is for converting human > > mysery into ordinary human unhappiness.....ONS..Tony. > > > Namaste RM, I'm sorry if I took your statement to describe a caste. You are right I only understand the Varna system, not the other hundreds of Castes, Jatis, and unscheduled etc etc. I live in Vancouver and the Sikhs who are the majority Indian contingent even divide themselves up into a ridiculous amount of castes and Jats. Some of them even murder their own children if they make a break. I always thought the Sikhs didn't believe in castes so fervently, but my experience shows me something else. No doubt the Indian Christians do the same thing, it is very cultural, as opposed to religious. I was associated with the Hindus for about 15 years so I picked up some info there, but they are the minority Indians here. My quotation as it happens should have read talking is to convert hysterical human misery to ordinary human unhappiness, and was a general quote on 'talking' nothing really personal to you.....ONS...Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.