Guest guest Posted January 5, 2002 Report Share Posted January 5, 2002 I have been a regular reader of the spiritual magazine “mantra tantra yantra vigyan” for more than a year and I was proud of the magazine and its contents until now for some of the elements in December issue grabbed my attention that needed to be rectified in my opinion. I never read it from top to bottom but randomly as whatever grabs my attention first. I was nevertheless praising the authors of very good articles of jap, pranaayam and tantrokt ganapathi sadhna but after reading the “akhanda surakshya prayog” I considered it to have flaws. I am not referring to the mantras or the sadhna process but I am referring to the introduction or the ‘bhumika’ the author of the article has written. Indeed an introduction of the sadhna mentioned boosts up a sadhak’s self confidence and acquaints him/her with valuable knowledge but if the introduction seems to be only of a territory and claims to satisfy the needs and pleases the persons of territory itself then problem comes in. To make it clearer the intro of the article seems to be concentrated only for India and Indian persons. If I were an Indian my mind would be dancing with sheer joy of patriotism and the way we are forward in the international realm, how we have nuclear and are super power, proud of our ancient rishimunis. But halt! What are you trying to do?? I was thinking it to be a spiritual magazine and spiritualism doesn’t confine to a territory? And what is the author trying to do???? Doesn’t he want the magazine and spritualism as given us by pujya gurudev extend to every corner and crevices of the world or only India India and India???? I need explanation. First of all the magazine seems to have many spelling mistakes than it previously had. This should be taken into consideration. If I am not mistaken the so called India (bharat) mentioned in the magazine came to existence around 1950’s after the effort of late mahatma Gandhi and why so u people call the ancient rishi munis of India only??? Bharat me paida huwe..bharat ke amuk rishi. For your kind information Pakistan was also in India..India was very large and it wasn’t called India it was called “bharatvarsha” and countries like Nepal was in it too. And the ancient rishi munis weren’t only from so called India.. there were from the countries of bharat warsha..gautama Buddha was born in Nepal. Sita was born here. Ram and sita’s marriage took place here.. rawan was born in shri lanka. Shri pujya gurudev gorakhnath manifested in the form of avatar in present Pakistan...and why are you people confining the ancient rishi munis to only India? And if u notice nicely the stories of Ramayana and mahabharata extend to Nepal India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, shrilanka, Tibet etc. for eg ..ram was born in todays India..married in todays Nepal. Fought rawan in todays shri lanka. I hope you get my point. Now I would like the concerned person to explain the written text as follows “America aur England jeise desh jo apne ko sabse adhik surakshit samajte the, aaj wahi apni surakshya ke vishaya me math kha gaye, jo sadheiv manavta se khilwaad karte rahe, abpe swarthe ke liye bharat jaisa shanty priya desh ko dhoka dekar buddhiman bante the, prakriti ne unhe bhi dand ke kar apni shakti ko unhe smaran dila diya”……further…”do kaudi ke desh jo apni sahayata se mauj kar rahe hai, unke saamne bhi gidgida rahe hai…..? Either I am so illiterate that I couldn’t understand the meaning of these all or I am a concerned person who would like the magazine not to involve mutual differentiations. Okay I say again that the satirical paragraph if read by Indians only would make them blind to notice the small but big holes it contains but I am a Nepalese moresoever a follower of pujya gurudev. According to me the author is trying to blame mother nature against the wish of gurudev who had said that we have the habit of saying “bhagwan ki marzi ….jo huwa accha huwa ..ham kuch nai kar sakte”.the author should be aware of the reactions a small accidental commitment could make. As I could counter attack with you like “India a peace loving country?? If India was a peace loving country it wouldn’t be so cunning to take nepal’s small land by claiming false small river to be the mahakali river..or degrade in its morals trying to prove bodhgaya is the birthplace of gautamabuddha by building a dam and trying to flood lumbini the correct birth place of Buddha. And I would say “nature has given punish ment to India for these acts by occurrence of earthquake in gujrat” What is happening here??? We are supposed to be a pariwar siddhashram sadkhak pariwar and if a member hurts the feelings of other members that cannot be tolerated. We haven’t come here to fight we have come here to achieve something nevertheless the main wish of gurudev was the spritiual magazine itself..which alas! Has been confined to a territory! Persons of a territory/country!..i wonder if it makes up with the world. /jay jay gorakh jay jay nikhil/ "Love in its absolute and pure form is all compassionate all pervaiding all divine but often in the world petty selfishness assumes the name of love and rules the world with hatred" Send FREE video emails in Mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 > amit, dear brother, i do not think you will get a reply. so do not worry waiting for it. all sadhnas that i did or will do are taken from mty. i am not an authority even in a minor way to comment on the mantras and sadhnas given. i really do not know who the authors are as for some reason their names are not mentioned. BUt do remember one thing. the sooner you learn it the better. do not place trust in anyone, however higher he may be to you as a sadhak, or whatever blindly. that will save you a lot of pain in the spiritual process. also, follow you own direction. listen to all others but place confidence in your self before anyone else. if you believe that anything should not have flaws, then you will have to change your own definitions of right or wrong to accommodate for what your brain refuses to believe. many who ascribe to this path are very successful in sadhnas, because they believe so easily.. on the other hand, if you are willing to analyse what will suffer is devotion and faith. you will have to work harder, keep your spine straight at all cost. listen to your mind and conclusions. In all honesty we all try to do both. BUt the % varies from person to person. For me it is 90% the second. What are you trying to do?? I was thinking it to be a spiritual magazine and spiritualism doesn't confine to a territory? And what is the author trying to do???? Doesn't he want the magazine and spiritualism as given us by pujya gurudev extend to every corner and crevices of the world or only India India and India???? I need explanation. First of all the magazine seems to have many spelling mistakes than it previously had. This should be taken into consideration. i am proud that you have the courage to point out what you believe in. after vivekananda the rama krishna mission still runs, after yogananda his organization - self realization fellowship still function. do they have the same impact 50 years after??? It is the man who made an institution who is the soul of it. after he is gone like to admit it or not, the body suffers slowly. if you consider yourself a disciple of Nikhileshwarand it is your job to let this not happen. by pointing out flaws you are doing that. But please do not be touchy about the beliefs of other people. Buddha was born in Nepal. Sita was born here. Ram and sita's marriage took place here.. rawan was born in shri lanka. Shri pujya gurudev gorakhnath manifested in the form of avatar in present Pakistan... so did GURU nanak ,and many sikh GURUS. and why are you people confining the ancient rishi munis to only India? many of our saints --(your and mine) had a tendency to go to the hillly regions, so i am sure the density of population of saints who lived in present nepal, would be higher than in india. i fully agree and respect that nepal is as holy as India. so is pakistan, and bangladesh. for beliefs of any author, let them be. do note waste energy getting annoyed by them. "America aur England jeise desh jo apne ko sabse adhik surakshit samajte the, aaj wahi As I could counter attack with you like "India a peace loving country?? If India was a peace loving country it wouldn't be so cunning to take nepal's small land by claiming false small river to be the mahakali river..or degrade in its morals trying to prove bodhgaya is the birthplace of gautamabuddha by building a dam and trying to flood lumbini the correct birth place of Buddha. And I would say "nature has given punish ment to India for these acts by occurrence of earthquake in gujrat" in fact i read exactly that on a western astrologer's site...!! he was talking about india being punished for conducting nuclear tests. amit let it be. there always will be all kinds of thoughts and all kinds of people. you have to learn to take what makes sense to you, and let the rest be. you cannot fight all ill, all negativity in the world and you do not need to. What is happening here??? We are supposed to be a pariwar siddhashram sadkhak pariwar and if a member hurts the feelings of other members that cannot be tolerated. We haven't come here to fight we have come here to achieve something nevertheless the main wish of gurudev was the spritiual magazine itself..which alas! Has been confined to a territory! Persons of a territory/country!..i wonder if it makes up with the world. i do not care. you are my brother love anu /jay jay gorakh jay jay nikhil/ > > > > "Love in its absolute and pure form is all compassionate all pervaiding all divine but often in the world petty selfishness assumes the name of love and rules the world with hatred" > > > > > > Send FREE video emails in Mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2002 Report Share Posted January 9, 2002 I fully agreed with Amit Shrestha's comments/feedback. Amit Shrestha wrote: this is an email sent to mtvy (AT) siddhashram (DOT) org it may be of concern to you people too but i dont need explanation from ur side though criticism is welcomed. i cannot promise to answer every critism that may arise of this posting coz i'm a bit busy but i'll try I have been a regular reader of the spiritual magazine “mantra tantra yantra vigyan” for more than a year and I was proud of the magazine and its contents until now for some of the elements in December issue grabbed my attention that needed to be rectified in my opinion. I never read it from top to bottom but randomly as whatever grabs my attention first. I was nevertheless praising the authors of very good articles of jap, pranaayam and tantrokt ganapathi sadhna but after reading the “akhanda surakshya prayog” I considered it to have flaws. I am not referring to the mantras or the sadhna process but I am referring to the introduction or the ‘bhumika’ the author of the article has written. Indeed an introduction of the sadhna mentioned boosts up a sadhak’s self confidence and acquaints him/her with valuable knowledge but if the introduction seems to be only of a territory and claims to satisfy the needs and pleases the persons of territory itself then problem comes in. To make it clearer the intro of the article seems to be concentrated only for India and Indian persons. If I were an Indian my mind would be dancing with sheer joy of patriotism and the way we are forward in the international realm, how we have nuclear and are super power, proud of our ancient rishimunis. But halt! What are you trying to do?? I was thinking it to be a spiritual magazine and spiritualism doesn’t confine to a territory? And what is the author trying to do???? Doesn’t he want the magazine and spritualism as given us by pujya gurudev extend to every corner and crevices of the world or only India India and India???? I need explanation. First of all the magazine seems to have many spelling mistakes than it previously had. This should be taken into consideration. If I am not mistaken the so called India (bharat) mentioned in the magazine came to existence around 1950’s after the effort of late mahatma Gandhi and why so u people call the ancient rishi munis of India only??? Bharat me paida huwe..bharat ke amuk rishi. For your kind information Pakistan was also in India..India was very large and it wasn’t called India it was called “bharatvarsha” and countries like Nepal was in it too. And the ancient rishi munis weren’t only from so called India.. there were from the countries of bharat warsha..gautama Buddha was born in Nepal. Sita was born here. Ram and sita’s marriage took place here.. rawan was born in shri lanka. Shri pujya gurudev gorakhnath manifested in the form of avatar in present Pakistan...and why are you people confining the ancient rishi munis to only India? And if u notice nicely the stories of Ramayana and mahabharata extend to Nepal India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, shrilanka, Tibet etc. for eg ..ram was born in todays India..married in todays Nepal. Fought rawan in todays shri lanka. I hope you get my point. Now I would like the concerned person to explain the written text as follows “America aur England jeise desh jo apne ko sabse adhik surakshit samajte the, aaj wahi apni surakshya ke vishaya me math kha gaye, jo sadheiv manavta se khilwaad karte rahe, abpe swarthe ke liye bharat jaisa shanty priya desh ko dhoka dekar buddhiman bante the, prakriti ne unhe bhi dand ke kar apni shakti ko unhe smaran dila diya”……further…”do kaudi ke desh jo apni sahayata se mauj kar rahe hai, unke saamne bhi gidgida rahe hai…..? Either I am so illiterate that I couldn’t understand the meaning of these all or I am a concerned person who would like the magazine not to involve mutual differentiations. Okay I say again that the satirical paragraph if read by Indians only would make them blind to notice the small but big holes it contains but I am a Nepalese moresoever a follower of pujya gurudev. According to me the author is trying to blame mother nature against the wish of gurudev who had said that we have the habit of saying “bhagwan ki marzi ….jo huwa accha huwa ..ham kuch nai kar sakte”.the author should be aware of the reactions a small accidental commitment could make. As I could counter attack with you like “India a peace loving country?? If India was a peace loving country it wouldn’t be so cunning to take nepal’s small land by claiming false small river to be the mahakali river..or degrade in its morals trying to prove bodhgaya is the birthplace of gautamabuddha by building a dam and trying to flood lumbini the correct birth place of Buddha. And I would say “nature has given punish ment to India for these acts by occurrence of earthquake in gujrat” What is happening here??? We are supposed to be a pariwar siddhashram sadkhak pariwar and if a member hurts the feelings of other members that cannot be tolerated. We haven’t come here to fight we have come here to achieve something nevertheless the main wish of gurudev was the spritiual magazine itself..which alas! Has been confined to a territory! Persons of a territory/country!..i wonder if it makes up with the world. /jay jay gorakh jay jay nikhil/ "Love in its absolute and pure form is all compassionate all pervaiding all divine but often in the world petty selfishness assumes the name of love and rules the world with hatred" Send FREE video emails in Mail. Jay Gurudev Terms of Service. Attachment: (image/gif) C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\nsmailAK.gif [not stored] Attachment: (image/gif) C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\nsmailH6.gif [not stored] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2002 Report Share Posted January 10, 2002 India has been supposed to be and is the spiritual centre where many religious disciplines bloom without any partiality. spiritually there are no boundaries but at the same time one has duty to protect ones motherland whether it be a saint or a soldier. I guess the sadhana given there can be done by any national and for their country and i guess the article never laid the boundaries that it be performed only by indians living in India and only for India. The person who has written is an Indian and has expressed his views regarding this sadhana how valuable it has been for him. Reader can apply this by shifting the context. Being an Indian if i create a mantra that is beneficial to India i don't think i am being territorial. If u come to me with pure thoughts and ask me for a mantra for your country and i refuse than it will be territorial. If u look at India from the time it got freedom it has been a playground for politicians and neighbouring countries. Think of the plight of people who have lived on border. Magazine is being published from India and its bound to have issues that relate to India. Indian media will talk more about India than world. Same applies to the magazine. Amit now you are being territorial when you are talking about the origins of Bharat. Spiritualism has been and is the the soul of India. After partitions even now most of the knowledge remains in India and most of the elevated saints of the current times have taken birth here and this impacted the living of this land. It doesn't depend on where someone took birth it depends on where is the knowledge. Thats why its India, India and India. Acupressure and Martial Art went from India to China. Who is leader in these arts today undoubtely China. Acupressure and Martial Art have become synonymous to name China. If India is faulty at the issues concerning the false small river and lumbini you have all freedom to obtain necessary sadhana from Pujya Gurudev to set it right so that the justice is done in favour of Nepal and the hatred that u have towards India perishes. I guess India has never went forward to bomb Nepal for these issues. If Nepal is your country it depends on you to make it great. If i can use spirituality to make India great and safegaurd India i will do that. No one is blind to the aristocratic behaviour of USA and cheapness of India's neighbouring country. For your last quote i can quote Bhagvad Gita to you. Let me know about the big holes which to us (Indians) may feel small i will clarify to whatever extent i can. regards, Anurag this is an email sent to mtvy (AT) siddhashram (DOT) org it may be of concern to you people too but i dont need explanation from ur side though criticism is welcomed. i cannot promise to answer every critism that may arise of this posting coz i'm a bit busy but i'll try I have been a regular reader of the spiritual magazine "mantra tantra yantra vigyan" for more than a year and I was proud of the magazine and its contents until now for some of the elements in December issue grabbed my attention that needed to be rectified in my opinion. I never read it from top to bottom but randomly as whatever grabs my attention first. I was nevertheless praising the authors of very good articles of jap, pranaayam and tantrokt ganapathi sadhna but after reading the "akhanda surakshya prayog" I considered it to have flaws. I am not referring to the mantras or the sadhna process but I am referring to the introduction or the 'bhumika' the author of the article has written. Indeed an introduction of the sadhna mentioned boosts up a sadhak's self confidence and acquaints him/her with valuable knowledge but if the introduction seems to be only of a territory and claims to satisfy the needs and pleases the persons of territory itself then problem comes in. To make it clearer the intro of the article seems to be concentrated only for India and Indian persons. If I were an Indian my mind would be dancing with sheer joy of patriotism and the way we are forward in the international realm, how we have nuclear and are super power, proud of our ancient rishimunis. But halt! What are you trying to do?? I was thinking it to be a spiritual magazine and spiritualism doesn't confine to a territory? And what is the author trying to do???? Doesn't he want the magazine and spritualism as given us by pujya gurudev extend to every corner and crevices of the world or only India India and India???? I need explanation. First of all the magazine seems to have many spelling mistakes than it previously had. This should be taken into consideration. If I am not mistaken the so called India (bharat) mentioned in the magazine came to existence around 1950's after the effort of late mahatma Gandhi and why so u people call the ancient rishi munis of India only??? Bharat me paida huwe..bharat ke amuk rishi. For your kind information Pakistan was also in India..India was very large and it wasn't called India it was called "bharatvarsha" and countries like Nepal was in it too. And the ancient rishi munis weren't only from so called India.. there were from the countries of bharat warsha..gautama Buddha was born in Nepal. Sita was born here. Ram and sita's marriage took place here.. rawan was born in shri lanka. Shri pujya gurudev gorakhnath manifested in the form of avatar in present Pakistan...and why are you people confining the ancient rishi munis to only India! ? And if u notice nicely the stories of Ramayana and mahabharata extend to Nepal India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, shrilanka, Tibet etc. for eg ..ram was born in todays India..married in todays Nepal. Fought rawan in todays shri lanka. I hope you get my point. Now I would like the concerned person to explain the written text as follows "America aur England jeise desh jo apne ko sabse adhik surakshit samajte the, aaj wahi apni surakshya ke vishaya me math kha gaye, jo sadheiv manavta se khilwaad karte rahe, abpe swarthe ke liye bharat jaisa shanty priya desh ko dhoka dekar buddhiman bante the, prakriti ne unhe bhi dand ke kar apni shakti ko unhe smaran dila diya"......further..."do kaudi ke desh jo apni sahayata se mauj kar rahe hai, unke saamne bhi gidgida rahe hai.....? Either I am so illiterate that I couldn't understand the meaning of these all or I am a concerned person who would like the magazine not to involve mutual differentiations. Okay I say again that the satirical paragraph if read by Indians only would make them blind to notice the small but big holes it contains but I am a Nepalese moresoever a follower of pujya gurudev. According to me the author is trying to blame mother nature against the wish of gurudev who had said that we have the habit of saying "bhagwan ki marzi ....jo huwa accha huwa ..ham kuch nai kar sakte".the author should be aware of the reactions a small accidental commitment could make. As I could counter attack with you like "India a peace loving country?? If India was a peace loving country it wouldn't be so cunning to take nepal's small land by claiming false small river to be the mahakali river..or degrade in its morals trying to prove bodhgaya is the birthplace of gautamabuddha by building a dam and trying to flood lumbini the correct birth place of Buddha. And I would say "nature has given punish ment to India for these acts by occurrence of earthquake in gujrat" What is happening here??? We are supposed to be a pariwar siddhashram sadkhak pariwar and if a member hurts the feelings of other members that cannot be tolerated. We haven't come here to fight we have come here to achieve something nevertheless the main wish of gurudev was the spritiual magazine itself..which alas! Has been confined to a territory! Persons of a territory/country!..i wonder if it makes up with the world. /jay jay gorakh jay jay nikhil/ "Love in its absolute and pure form is all compassionate all pervaiding all divine but often in the world petty selfishness assumes the name of love and rules the world with hatred" Send FREE video emails in Mail. Jay GurudevYour use of is subject to the "THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE ALONG WITH ANY ATTACHMENTS IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE ADDRESSEE and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly Prohibited. If you have received this message by error, please notify us immediately, return the original mail to the sender and delete the message from your system." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2002 Report Share Posted January 11, 2002 I had no idea that India was such a big bully till I read your mail, Amit. Every now and then one hears of resentment against India in Nepal and I could not figure out why(now i know why). Aum Namasivaya, Vijay --- "Goel, Anurag (CORP, GEITC)" <anurag.goel wrote: > > India has been supposed to be and is the spiritual > centre where many > religious disciplines bloom without any partiality. > spiritually there are no boundaries but at the same > time one has duty to > protect ones motherland whether it be a saint or a > soldier. I guess the > sadhana given there can be done by any national and > for their country and i > guess the article never > laid the boundaries that it be performed only by > indians living in India and > only for India. The person who has written is an > Indian > and has expressed his views regarding this sadhana > how valuable it has been > for him. Reader can apply this by shifting the > context. > > Being an Indian if i create a mantra that is > beneficial to India i don't > think i am being territorial. If u come to me with > pure thoughts and ask me > for a mantra for your country and i refuse than it > will be territorial. If u > look at India from the time it got freedom it has > been a playground for > politicians and neighbouring countries. Think of the > plight of people who > have lived on border. Magazine is being published > from India and its bound > to have issues that relate to India. Indian media > will talk more about India > than world. > Same applies to the magazine. > > Amit now you are being territorial when you are > talking about the origins of > Bharat. Spiritualism has been and is the the soul of > India. After partitions > even now most of the knowledge remains in India and > most of the elevated > saints of the current times have taken birth here > and this impacted the > living of this land. It doesn't depend on where > someone took birth it > depends on where is the knowledge. Thats why its > India, India and India. > > Acupressure and Martial Art went from India to > China. Who is leader in these > arts today undoubtely China. Acupressure and Martial > Art have become > synonymous to name China. > > If India is faulty at the issues concerning the > false small river and > lumbini you have all freedom to obtain necessary > sadhana from Pujya Gurudev > to set it right so that the justice is done in > favour of Nepal and the > hatred that u have towards India perishes. I guess > India has never went > forward to bomb Nepal for these issues. If Nepal is > your country it depends > on you to make it great. If i can use spirituality > to make India great and > safegaurd India i will do that. No one is blind to > the aristocratic > behaviour of USA and cheapness of India's > neighbouring country. For your > last quote i can quote Bhagvad Gita to you. > > Let me know about the big holes which to us > (Indians) may feel small i will > clarify to whatever extent i can. > > > > regards, > Anurag > > > > this is an email sent to mtvy > <mtvy > it may be of concern to you people too but i dont > need explanation from ur > side though criticism is welcomed. i cannot promise > to answer every critism > that may arise of this posting coz i'm a bit busy > but i'll try > > I have been a regular reader of the spiritual > magazine "mantra tantra yantra > vigyan" for more than a year and I was proud of the > magazine and its > contents until now for some of the elements in > December issue grabbed my > attention that needed to be rectified in my opinion. > > I never read it from top to bottom but > randomly as whatever > grabs my attention first. I was nevertheless > praising the authors of very > good articles of jap, pranaayam and tantrokt > ganapathi sadhna but after > reading the "akhanda surakshya prayog" I considered > it to have flaws. I am > not referring to the mantras or the sadhna process > but I am referring to the > introduction or the 'bhumika' the author of the > article has written. Indeed > an introduction of the sadhna mentioned boosts up a > sadhak's self confidence > and acquaints him/her with valuable knowledge but if > the introduction seems > to be only of a territory and claims to satisfy the > needs and pleases the > persons of territory itself then problem comes in. > > To make it clearer the intro of the > article seems to be > concentrated only for India and Indian persons. If I > were an Indian my mind > would be dancing with sheer joy of patriotism and > the way we are forward in > the international realm, how we have nuclear and are > super power, proud of > our ancient rishimunis. But halt! > > What are you trying to do?? I was > thinking it to be a spiritual > magazine and spiritualism doesn't confine to a > territory? And what is the > author trying to do???? Doesn't he want the magazine > and spritualism as > given us by pujya gurudev extend to every corner and > crevices of the world > or only India India and India???? > > I need explanation. > > First of all the magazine seems to have many > spelling mistakes than it > previously had. This should be taken into > consideration. > > If I am not mistaken the so called India > (bharat) mentioned in > the magazine came to existence around 1950's after > the effort of late > mahatma Gandhi and why so u people call the ancient > rishi munis of India > only??? Bharat me paida huwe..bharat ke amuk rishi. > For your kind > information Pakistan was also in India..India was > very large and it wasn't > called India it was called "bharatvarsha" and > countries like Nepal was in it > too. And the ancient rishi munis weren't only from > so called India.. there > were from the countries of bharat warsha..gautama > Buddha was born in Nepal. > Sita was born here. Ram and sita's marriage took > place here.. rawan was born > in shri lanka. Shri pujya gurudev gorakhnath > manifested in the form of > avatar in present Pakistan...and why are you people > confining the ancient > rishi munis to only India! ? And if u notice nicely > the stories of Ramayana > and mahabharata extend to Nepal India, Pakistan, > Bangladesh, shrilanka, > Tibet etc. for eg ..ram was born in todays > India..married in todays Nepal. > Fought rawan in todays shri lanka. I hope you get my > point. > > Now I would like the concerned person to > explain the written > text as follows > > "America aur England jeise desh jo apne ko sabse > adhik surakshit samajte > the, aaj wahi apni surakshya ke vishaya me math kha > gaye, jo sadheiv manavta > se khilwaad karte rahe, abpe swarthe ke liye bharat > jaisa shanty priya desh > ko dhoka dekar buddhiman bante the, prakriti ne unhe > bhi dand ke kar apni > shakti ko unhe smaran dila diya"......further..."do > kaudi ke desh jo apni > sahayata se mauj kar rahe hai, unke saamne bhi > gidgida rahe hai.....? > > Either I am so illiterate that I > couldn't understand the meaning > of these all or I am a concerned person who would > like the magazine not to > === message truncated === Send FREE video emails in Mail! http://promo./videomail/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.