Guest guest Posted January 2, 2001 Report Share Posted January 2, 2001 Attachment: [not stored] Attachment: [not stored] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2001 Report Share Posted January 2, 2001 Dear Mr Wright, Thank you for writing to me. Yesterday, being the 1st day of the new millennium, I was at Ramanasram, Tiruvannamalai. Spent about two hours there praying and meditating alongwith friends from different part of the world. It was a wonderful feeling. Did you ever visit Asram at Tiruvannamalai? Pray Lord that may 2001 and beyond be blissful, happy and wonderful to you. Subramanian. --- Miles Wright <ramana.bhakta wrote: > > > > > Post message: RamanaMaharshi > Subscribe: RamanaMaharshi- > Un: > RamanaMaharshi- > List owner: RamanaMaharshi-owner > > Shortcut URL to this page: > /community/RamanaMaharshi > > ATTACHMENT part 2.1 application/applefile name=page_4.jpg > ATTACHMENT part 2.2 image/jpeg name=page_4.jpg; x-mac-creator=6F676C65; x-mac-type=4A504547 Photos - Share your holiday photos online! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2001 Report Share Posted January 3, 2001 Ajatavada - The Theory of Non-Origination In the Mandukya Upanishad we find one of the earliest expositions of Advaita. This Upanishad, one of the ten principal Upanishads, was glossed by Gaudapada, the teacher of the teacher of Sankara, in his famous Karika. Here we find the first systematic attempt at enunciating Ajatavada, the theory of no-birth. The core of Gaudapada's disputation is that there is nothing that is ever born (ajata), nothing that ever dies, no evolution or involution, no seeker, no one bound, and no liberation. Ramana Maharshi states, "According to this, there is only One and it admits of no discussion." (Talks; 383) Ramana Maharshi has explained that for the jnani the appearance of the world is non real when seen as a product of cause and effect, while the Absolute (Self) alone is real. However, the world is real for the jnani as an uncaused appearance in the Self. The underlying reality of the world, which is of the nature of Being (sat), is inseparable from the Self. The dvandvas (pairs of opposites) which divide the world into mind and matter, subject and object, I and you, etc. are such in name only, like the ring made from gold is never more than gold. Here we already begin to see the reason for the difficulty of discussion; any discussion, itself, must start from within the constructs of illusory suppositions, as if the ring is assumed to be self existent and different from the gold. Enquiry shows this to be false. It might still be asked, "how can you say the world is not real when I can touch it, see it etc.?" In reply we might recount the analogy of the snake in the rope. It is possible to mistake a piece of rope for a snake and as long as the mind sees and understands 'snake' there cannot be a rope. The non reality of snake has been imposed on the rope. The conviction however becomes fixed. Even if a reliable witness tells you that the snake is indeed just a harmless piece of rope still the conviction might remain that there is 'really' a snake in front of you. If the appearance is taken to be real then no attempt to enquire into the reality itself can be effective. However if there is doubt as to the reality of the 'snake' then enquiry becomes extremely effective. Reality is all there is, all else is imposition. If we look at the Mandukya Upanishad itself we can catch the impetus for Gaudapada's Karika. In this wonderful work, having been told that the personal self in reality is none other than the Self, we are told about the four states of Atman (Self). The first state of the Self is that which is common to all situated in the waking state with seven agents; head; eye; breath; heart; stomach; feet; and trunk along with their nineteen agencies; the five organs of sense; the five organs of action; the five fires; ahamkara; manas; buddhi; and citta. All are outwardly directed and actively enjoying. The second state of the Self is the subtle mental state of dreaming in which all the above agents and agencies again participate in the enjoyment but with perception turned inward. The third state is that of deep sleep. No desires, no dream weaving plagues the mind of one in that state. This is known as the intelligent state wherein knowing that one Self, in complete singularity, with unbroken knowledge, there is total bliss. The Self is the Lord of all; dwelling in the hearts of all; he is the source of all; he is the knower of all; he is the beginning and dissolution of all. In the fourth state the Self is not known by perception whether turned inwards; outwards; nor by a combination of both; nor as the sum of all that is known, nor that which is known, nor that which is not known; nor as that which is perceived, grasped or described. The Self is unthinkable; undefinable; and indescribable. The proof of its existence is its own self-existence wherein the world disappears; tranquil; good; one without a second. That is the Self, which should be perceived and indeed which in reality is ever perceived. Gaudapada in his gloss quite categorically states that there is no difference between the waking and the dreaming states. This is borne out by statements made by Bhagavan, again and again, throughout Talks, confirming that the jnani sees no difference between waking and dreaming. The Self is the sole Reality. All else is appearance. Miles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2001 Report Share Posted January 4, 2001 Dear Subramanian, This must have been an uplifting experience I am sure. To meditate in the vicinity of the Hill is a very fortunate experience. When I was younger (many years ago) I used to pray for the day that I would travel to Arunachala, even although Bhagavan had declared that merely to think of Arunachala was sufficient for moksa. Nowadays the desire to physically travel there is not very strong. Atmavicara, I feel, is the surest way to find Arunachala, here and now. However I love to read and hear of devotees experiences at Tiruvannamalai. Please tell us more of your experiences if you are so moved. Thank you for your best wishes. Kind Regards Miles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.