Guest guest Posted April 23, 2002 Report Share Posted April 23, 2002 Dear Gloria: Thanks for you always relevant and helpful posts. Aloha, a very tired ALTON RamanaMaharshi, "Gloria Lee" <glee@c...> wrote: > > Hi Alton, > These seem relevant to some questions you have raised recently. > Love, > Gloria > > 28-6-46 (Day by Day) > > In the afternoon Khanna's wife appealed to Bhagavan in writing: "I am not > learned in the scriptures and I find the method of Self-enquiry too hard for > me. I am a woman with seven children and a lot of household cares, and it > leaves me little time for meditation. I request Bhagavan to give me some > simpler and easier method." > > Bhagavan: "No learning or knowledge of scriptures is necessary to know the > Self, as no man requires a mirror to see himself. All knowledge is required > only to be given up eventually as not-Self. Nor is household work or cares > with children necessarily an obstacle. If you can do nothing more, at least > continue saying `I, I' to yourself mentally all the time, as advised in Who > am I? Whatever work you may be doing and whether you are sitting, standing > or walking. `I' is the name of God. It is the first and greatest of all > mantras. Even OM is second to it." > > Khanna: The jiva is said to be mind plus illumination. What is it that > desires Self-realization and what is it that obstructs our path to > Self-realization? It is said that the mind obstructs and the illumination > helps. > > Bhagavan: "Although we describe the jiva as mind plus the reflected light of > the Self, in actual practice, in life, you cannot separate the two, just as, > in the illustrations we used yesterday, you can't separate cloth and > whiteness in a white cloth or fire and iron in a red-hot rod. The mind can > do nothing by itself. It emerges only with the illumination and can do no > action, good or bad, except with the illumination. But while the > illumination is always there, enabling the mind to act well or ill, the > pleasure or pain resulting from such action is not felt by the illumination, > just as when you hammer a red-hot rod, it is not the fire but the iron that > gets the hammering." > > Khanna: "Is there destiny? And if what is destined to happen will happen is > there any use in prayer or effort, or should we just remain idle?" > > Bhagavan: "There are only two ways to conquer destiny or be independent of > it. One is to enquire for whom is this destiny and discover that only the > ego is bound by destiny and not the Self, and that the ego is non- existent. > The other way is to kill the ego by completely surrendering to the Lord, by > realizing one's helplessness and saying all the time, `Not I but Thou, oh > Lord!', and giving up all sense of `I' and `mine' and leaving it to the Lord > to do what he likes with you. Surrender can never be regarded as complete so > long as the devotee wants this or that from the Lord. True surrender is love > of God for the sake of love and nothing else, not even for the sake of > salvation. In other words, complete effacement of the ego is necessary to > conquer destiny, whether you achieve this effacement through Self- enquiry or > through bhakti-marga." > > Khanna: "Are our prayers granted?" > > Bhagavan: "Yes, they are granted. No thought will go in vain. Every thought > will produce its effect some time or other. Thought-force will never go in > vain. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.