Guest guest Posted June 7, 2002 Report Share Posted June 7, 2002 Devotee: Some people report Maharshi to deny the need of a Guru. Other say the reverse. What does Maharshi say? Bhagavan: I have never said that there is no need for a Guru. D: Sri Aurobindo often refers to you as having had no Guru. B: That depends on what you call Guru. He need not necessarily be in human form. Dattratreya had twenty-four Gurus - the elements, etc. That means that any form in the world was his Guru. Guru is absolutely necessary. The Upanishads say that none but a Guru can take a man out of the jungle of mental and sense perception, so there must be a Guru. D: I mean a human Guru. The Maharshi didn't have one. B: I might have had at some time or other. And didn't I sing hymns to Arunachala? What is a Guru? Guru is God or the Self. First a man prays to God to fulfill his desires, then a time comes when he does not pray for the fulfilment of a desire but for God Himself..So God appears to him in some form or other, human or non-human, to guide him as a Guru in answer to his prayers. >From The Teachings of Ramana Maharshi...editor Osborne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.