Guest guest Posted August 24, 2002 Report Share Posted August 24, 2002 "The Man Called Ramana" ~Arthur Osborne It was the most majestic film I have ever seen, the most awe-inspiring and yet without incident. There is a view of Arunachala hill from the ashram drive, and then a tall, frail, light- complexioned man with short, white hair descends the slope of the hill with the aid of a staff. Then he comes out of the ashram hall, stops to smile at a baby, walks across the grounds-just simple, everyday actions, and yet the beauty of them was breathtaking. The simplicity was so natural, the smile so spontaneous, the majesty so inherent. His complexion was pale, almost golden, his white hair and beard always short, as the ashram authorities gave him a shave every full-moon day in the manner of sannyasins. Emaciated, aged beyond his years with the burden of our sorrows, stiff-kneed with rheumatism, he leaned heavily on his staff as he walked, his eyes cast down. He had an air of modesty, utter simplicity, and childlike defenselessness. The mere sight of him walking across the ashram ground was enough to grip the heart. People who seemed unconcerned with spiritual matters would gaze at him with love in their eyes. The story of Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi is simplicity itself. Born in a poor brahmin family in South India in 1879, he went to a mission school where he learned a little English. He was a normal, healthy boy, fonder of sport than study. At the age of seventeen, when any adolescent might pass from boyhood to manhood, the great change came over him. One day a sudden, intense fear of death assailed him, a feeling of the immediate imminence of death. There was no one to turn to, no one to give help. He felt that he must face it alone. Lying in a rigid position upon his bed, he tried to visualize, to dramatize death. He held his breath to make the experience more vivid, thereby unconsciously practicing the technique of pranayama, or breath control. He said, Well then, now death is come. What does it mean? This body is dead. It will be carried to the burning ghat and there burned and reduced to ashes. But with the death of this body am "I" dead? Is this body "I"?-Self-Realization, by B. V. Narasimha Swami All this was no dull-thought. Vividly, the living truth flashed before him that he was neither the inert body nor the thoughts that pass and are gone. He was the eternal "I," the deathless Spirit. In that moment, death was vanquished; he awoke into Enlight-enment of the eternal Self. A lifetime of striving and sadhana was, for him, compressed into that brief moment. He later learned the theory of Enlightenment and recognized it, just as a woman who had borne a child might read afterward about childbirth. His whole manner of living changed. He lost all interest in external things and would fall constantly into the bliss of the Self. After his father died, his elder brother, who was designated by his uncle to lead the family, resented the change and rebuked him one day for behaving like a sadhu while enjoying the benefits of family life. The young Ramana, recognizing the justice of the rebuke, secretly left home in 1896 and went to the sacred hill of Arunachala, where he remained for fifty-four years until, on April 14, 1950, he parted from the body he had worn. For some time after his arrival at Arunachala, he remained immersed in the effulgence of bliss, barely conscious of his body, not needing it, not speaking or moving, and scarcely eating, so that to onlookers it appeared to be the most intense tapas.It was not really tapas at all. He was simply ignoring the body that he had ceased to need. He once indicated this by saying, "I did not eat, so they said I was fasting; I did not speak, so they said I was observing mouna." He was already a jivanmukta, a liberated being. Living in unwavering consciousness of his identity with the Self, he had no karma left to wipe out, no sin to atone for, and no further goal to attain. For a while, he made his abode in the underground vault of the great temple at Tiruvannamalai and, immersed in samadhi, took no heed of the ants, mosquitoes, and vermin, though his back and thighs became an open wound from them. Some sadhus took him a single cup of thin gruel each day, which was all his food; finally, they carried him out bodily while he was immersed in samadhi. His body was so neglected that it might not have endured long, and he might have effortlessly discarded it. So the story would have ended. However, for us the story began when compassion for those who gathered around, seeking his grace and guidance, drew him back to a full bodily life. From then on, there was a motive for continuing in bodily form-the motive of compassion. One of the spiritual paradoxes is that one who lays down one's life finds it; one who surrenders one's individuality becomes more individual than anyone else. The jivanmukta has dissolved the ego, which exploits and perverts one's individual characteristics, and therefore these characteristics can grow to their true likeness, neither stunted nor warped, shining forth more clearly than in other people. In two masters, divine grace will be the same, but the characteristics of the human vehicle will be quite different. Bhagavan Sri Ramana was meticulously exact, closely observant, practical, and humorous. His daily life was conducted with punctiliousness that Indians today would have to call purely Western. Everything had to be precise and orderly. The ashram hall was swept out several times daily. The books were always in their places, and the cloths covering the couch were scrupulously clean and beautifully folded. The loincloth, which was all he wore, was gleaming white. The two clocks in the hall were adjusted daily to radio time, and the calendar was never allowed to fall behind the current date. The routine of life flowed in a regular pattern. Bhagavan was affable and courteous to all visitors. He expressed no pontifical solemnity in his exposition. On the contrary, his speech, whether on daily affairs or on doctrine, was vivacious and full of laughter. So infectious was his laughter that even those who did not know Tamil would spontaneously join in. Right up to the end he joked, and yet his jokes also bore instruction. When the doctors were alarmed to see a new tumor pushing up during his final sickness, he said, laughing, "Why do you worry? Its nature is to come up." When a woman beat her head against a post outside his room in grief, despite his insistence that the body's death was no cause for grief, he listened for a moment and then said, "Oh, I thought somebody was trying to break a coconut." A devotee asked why his prayers were not answered, and Bhagavan replied, laughing, "If they were, you might stop praying." His face was like the face of water, always changing and yet always the same. He would be laughing and talking, then he would turn graciously to a small child or hand a nut to a squirrel that hopped onto his couch from the window, or his radiant, wide-open eyes would shine with love upon some devotee who had just arrived or was taking leave. Then, in silence a moment later, his face would be rock-like, eternal in its grandeur. The love that shone in his eyes, the luminous understanding, cannot be described. Someone came to the ashram broken down with the hopeless grief of bereavement, and after hearing the story, Bhagavan simply looked, no word spoken, and peace flooded the visitor's soul. An old pandit, who knew Sri Ramana as a boy and who had visited many yogis, decided to visit "Yogi" Ramana also and discuss philosophy with him. However, standing before the couch, the pandit felt his whole body electrified with awe, and before he knew what had happened, he fell on his face before Bhagavan. Little children were drawn to him and gladdened by his smile. A laborer picked up a blown sheet of paper, and, seeing Ramana's picture on it, he exclaimed, "Bhagavan!" and folded it reverently to take away with him. Like people, animals were drawn to him. Once he came back late from his afternoon walk on the hill, and while devotees clustered in groups or sat waiting or followed him up the hillside, a pair of monkeys came to the doorway of the hall and, forgetting their fear of people, they came inside and gazed anxiously at the vacant couch. A monkey that has been tended by humans is ostracized by its fellows on its return to wildlife, but any that had been tended by Bhagavan were gladly received. Having transcended the ego, Maharshi transcended fear and antagonism, and animals sensed this. A snake crept over his leg, and he did not move or shrink. When a devotee asked him later what it felt like to have a snake pass over one, he replied, laughing, "Cold and moist." The consideration that Bhagavan showed to people and animals extended even to inanimate objects. Every action had to be performed intentionally and nothing was wasted. I have seen the meticulous care with which a book was bound and cuttings pasted, and have heard an attendant reproved for wanting to cut into a new sheet of paper when one already started would suffice. Our exploitation of nature is ruthless today; it is more a rape than a harvesting. Therefore it was a chastening sight to see the divine embodiment so careful in the use of things. He especially never wasted food. He might distribute a gift of fruit to children who were present or to monkeys who tried to steal it, but he never wasted anything. We mistakenly think that economy goes with frugality and generosity with extravagance, yet very often the frugal are wasteful and the generous are careful. When Bhagavan had finished a meal, the banana leaf on which he had eaten was as clean as though it had been washed. Not a grain of rice was wasted. In former years, when his body was more robust, he used to help in the kitchen, preparing meals, and he insisted that even the parings of the vegetables should be used as cattle feed and not thrown away. Although all wished to obey him, Bhagavan's life was, notwithstanding, a lesson in submission. Owing to his refusal to express any wish or desire, the ashram authorities built up their own structure of regulations, and Bhagavan obeyed them without hesitation. If devotees found them irksome, they had before their eyes the example of Bhagavan's own submission. If Bhagavan ever resisted it was likely to be in the interests of the devotees. Even so, he acted usually in silence and often in a manner dictated by his shrewd sense of humor. An attendant once rebuked a European woman for sitting with her legs stretched out. Bhagavan at once sat up cross-legged and continued so, despite the pain caused by the rheumatism in his knees. When the devotees protested, he replied that the attendant's orders were for everyone. Only when the lesson had been driven home did he consent to relax. But it was not only Bhagavan's submission to regulations, but his submission to all the conditions of life, including pain and sickness, that taught us silently that pain cannot disturb the equanimity of one who abides in the Self. Throughout the long and painful sickness that finally killed his body, he submitted loyally, one after another, to the doctors who were put in charge, never complaining or asking for a change of treatment. If there was ever any inclination to try a different treatment, it was only so that those who recommended it should not be disappointed; and even then, the treatment depended on the consent of the ashram authorities. If there is a tendency to regard submission as spiritless, it is only because we regard egoism as natural. Doubtless, it is more spirited to fight for one's desires than to submit reluctantly to their denial, but Bhagavan showed us the way to freedom from desire. Such freedom is not the submission of the dejected, but the joy of unity, for one does not submit to a stranger but to the Self. Because Bhagavan sought to free us from psychic as well as physical desires, he disapproved of all freakishness and eccentricity and all interest in visions and desire for powers. He liked seekers to behave in a normal and sane way. For he was guiding us towards the ultimate Reality, where perceptions and powers which people call "higher" or "miraculous" are as illusory as those they call "physical." A visitor once related how his guru died and was buried, then three years later returned in tangible bodily form to give instructions. Bhagavan sat unmoved-as though he had not heard. The bell rang for lunch, and he rose to leave the hall. At the doorway he turned and quoted, "Though a man can enter ever so many bodies, does it mean that he has found his true Home?" One of the most delightful examples of his humor was when he was asked, "If somebody who desired certain powers obtained moksha directly through the force of sadhana, would he automatically acquire the desired powers?" Bhagavan replied, "If he obtained moksha, it would not harm him even if he did have power." No one could be more simple and unostentatious. He called nothing his own and never asked for anything. He accepted the food and clothing that were necessary, but nothing more. The only outer gifts that one could make were fruit and flowers, which were taken to the dining hall and shared among all equally. Bhagavan refused to have any special consideration shown to him. If those who were sitting in the hall started to rise when he entered, he motioned to them, almost impatiently, to remain seated. I have seen him refuse to have an electric fan switched on because the devotees would not benefit equally. Afterward, ceiling fans were installed and all benefited alike. Once, when an attendant was placing a quarter mango on each person's leaf and slipped a half mango on Bhagavan's, he angrily put it back and took a small piece. Being established immutably in the Reality beyond all forms, he saw forms and events not with the inherent and graded importance that they seemed to bear for us, but by compassionately witnessing the importance that we gave them. Pandits were once sitting in the hall with Sanskrit texts, which they occasionally took up to Bhagavan to explain a particular point. A three-year-old, not to be outdone, took up his book of nursery rhymes, and Bhagavan was no less gracious and showed no less interest to him than to the others. However, the book was tattered, so he took it and supervised its mending and binding, then returned it to the child the next day, fully renovated. Towards the end, Bhagavan aged far beyond his years. He looked more like ninety than seventy. In one who had a strong constitution, who had scarcely known sickness except for the rheumatism of his last years, and who was impervious to grief, worry, anxiety, hope, or regret, this would appear incredible, but it was the burden of his compassion: "He who taketh upon himself the sins of the world." Devotees came and sat before him, burdened with sorrows, tormented with doubts, darkened with impurities, and, as they sat, they felt themselves carefree and lightened. How many have come and sat there, weighed down with grief, failure, or bereavement, and the light of his eyes dissolved their pain until a wave of peace flood their hearts? How many have come primed with questions, which seemed to them all-important and which their thoughts and readings had failed to solve? It might be in desperate hope or as a challenge that they brought their questions, but as they sat there the questioning mind itself experienced tranquility and the questions faded away, no longer needing to be asked. Then, if they opened their hearts, a deeper understanding was implanted there. Even the way Ramana discarded his body was supremely compassionate. Many of the devotees believed that they could not endure or survive his physical death. When the sickness dragged on month after month, after the doctors had found it incurable and had declared that the pain must be intense (although Bhagavan did not show it), the devotees became reconciled to the inevitable. Sometimes one or another implored him to desire to be well, but in their hearts they knew that he would use no powers that they themselves could not use. Indeed, had he consented, it would have been a boon of a few years only, whereas the boon he granted was for all time and beyond time, for he said, "I am not going away. Where could I go?" Where, indeed, for he is Bhagavan. For years, his body had been tortured by rheumatism. The knees were swollen, and he walked stiff- legged and with difficulty and had to give up his daily walks on the sacred hill, Aruna-chala. More than a year before the end, a small tumor appeared on the left elbow. Doctors cut it out but it returned worse than before, eventually to be diagnosed as serious. Various kinds of treatment were given, and Bhagavan submitted to whatever was prescribed. Three more times it was removed, and after each operation it returned worse and higher up. By December 1949, the doctors said they could do no more. After four operations, the tumor had reached the shoulder and had gone inward. The doctors said that the pain must have been excruciating, though Bhagavan seldom gave any sign that he was suffering. The whole system was poisoned, and the last months were one long martyrdom. Yet, to the last, he insisted that all those who came to him should receive darshana twice a day, walking past the room where he lay. At the very end, when every touch was agony, he ordered the attendants to raise him to a sitting posture and he died sitting. At the moment of death, people saw a large star trail slowly across the sky to the peak of Aruna-chala as his Spirit returned to the Father. That night, while the body he had now relinquished was exposed to the view of the devotees in the great new hall of the ashram, they spontaneously sang the Tamil verse he composed long ago, "Arunachala-Ramana." The spiritual power of Arunachala has become active again, as it was long ago. Bhagavan said, "I am not going away; I am here." He remains here in Tiruvannamalai as before, and at the same time he is the spaceless Arunachala-Ramana, abiding in the heart of every devotee who turns to him for guidance. The grace of Bhagavan radiates from Arunachala and from his shrine no less now than it did while he was in the body. People are drawn there as they were to his physical presence and feel their doubts and questions melt away and their appeals dissolve in love. From For Those with Little Dust, by Arthur Osborne. Copyright 2001 by Sri Ramanasramam. Reprinted by arrangement with Inner Directions Publishing, PO Box 130070, Carlsbad, California 92013. www.InnerDirections.org. LoveAlways, Mazie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.