Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 dear Richard , this translation appears in the Collected Works of Ramana Maharshi Edited and compiled by Arthur Osborne , Rider and Co. 1959 . One assumes Osborne was the trasnslator - he does not state otherwise .There have been several editions since . .He says this and the Supplement are the most comprehensive exposition of Maharshi's teaching .Regards Alan --- Richard Clarke <r_clarke wrote: <HR> <html><body> <tt> Dear Group,<BR> <BR> SAT wants to put a version of "40 verses" in their web site, which <BR> they are redoing now. The version that starts as below is a very <BR> nice translation (obviously of the original Tamil version, not an <BR> english translation of the Sankrit translation done by Ganapati Muni).<BR> <BR> Does any one know the translator and publisher of the version that <BR> starts below? (I find it one of the best of the translations. SAT <BR> does not want to use any translation that cannot be identified as to <BR> translator, etc., though)<BR> <BR> Invocation<BR> i. If Reality did not exist, could there be any knowledge of <BR> existence? Free from all thoughts, Reality abides in the Heart, the <BR> Source of all thoughts. It is, therefore, called the Heart. How then <BR> is one to contemplate it? To be as it is in the Heart, is Its <BR> contemplation.<BR> <BR> ii. Those who know intense fear of death seek refuge only at the feet <BR> of the Lord Who has neither death nor birth. Dead to themselves and <BR> their possessions, can the thought of death occur to them again? <BR> Deathless are they.<BR> <BR> 1. From our perception of the world there follows acceptance of a <BR> unique First Principle possessing various powers. Pictures of name <BR> and form, the person who sees, the screen on which he sees, and the <BR> light by which he sees: he himself is all of these.<BR> <BR> 2. All religions postulate the three fundamentals, the world, the <BR> soul, and God, but it is only the one Reality that manifests Itself <BR> as these three. One can say, 'The three are really three' only so <BR> long as the ego lasts. Therefore, to inhere in one's own Being, where <BR> the 'I', or ego, is dead, is the perfect State.<BR> <BR> Thank you.<BR> <BR> We are Not two,<BR> Richard<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> </tt> <br> <tt> <BR> Post message: RamanaMaharshi <BR> Subscribe: RamanaMaharshi- <BR> Un: RamanaMaharshi- <BR> List owner: RamanaMaharshi-owner <BR> <BR> Shortcut URL to this page:<BR> <a href="/community/RamanaMaharshi"> Terms of Service</a>.</tt> </br> </body></html> Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.''>http://uk.my.'>http://uk.my. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 Dear Richard, This is the version from the Mountain Path journal, its somewhere on their website, I'll look for it. Gloria - Richard Clarke RamanaMaharshi Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:13 PM [RamanaMaharshi] Which translator/version of "40 verses on Reality" Dear Group, SAT wants to put a version of "40 verses" in their web site, which they are redoing now. The version that starts as below is a very nice translation (obviously of the original Tamil version, not an english translation of the Sankrit translation done by Ganapati Muni). Does any one know the translator and publisher of the version that starts below? (I find it one of the best of the translations. SAT does not want to use any translation that cannot be identified as to translator, etc., though) Invocation i. If Reality did not exist, could there be any knowledge of existence? Free from all thoughts, Reality abides in the Heart, the Source of all thoughts. It is, therefore, called the Heart. How then is one to contemplate it? To be as it is in the Heart, is Its contemplation. ii. Those who know intense fear of death seek refuge only at the feet of the Lord Who has neither death nor birth. Dead to themselves and their possessions, can the thought of death occur to them again? Deathless are they. 1. From our perception of the world there follows acceptance of a unique First Principle possessing various powers. Pictures of name and form, the person who sees, the screen on which he sees, and the light by which he sees: he himself is all of these. Invocatory i. If Reality did not exist, could there be any knowledge of existence? Free from all thoughts, Reality abides in the Heart, the Source of all thoughts. It is, therefore, called the Heart. How then is one to contemplate it? To be as it is in the Heart, is Its contemplation. ii. Those who know intense fear of death seek refuge only at the feet of the Lord Who has neither death nor birth. Dead to themselves and their possessions, can the thought of death occur to them again? Deathless are they. Verses 1. From our perception of the world there follows acceptance of a unique First Principle possessing various powers. Pictures of name and form, the person who sees, the screen on which he sees, and the light by which he sees: he himself is all of these. 2. All religions postulate the three fundamentals, the world, the soul, and God, but it is only the one Reality that manifests Itself as these three. One can say, 'The three are really three' only so long as the ego lasts. Therefore, to inhere in one's own Being, where the 'I', or ego, is dead, is the perfect State. Thank you. We are Not two, Richard Post message: RamanaMaharshi Subscribe: RamanaMaharshi- Un: RamanaMaharshi- List owner: RamanaMaharshi-owner Shortcut URL to this page: /community/RamanaMaharshi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 http://www.ramana-maharshi.org/m_path/1964_4/october.htm This issue is also edited by Arthur Osborne, so its a confirmation. http://www.ramana-maharshi.org/m_path/1964_4/forty.htm - Gloria Lee RM Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:48 AM [RamanaMaharshi] Re: Which translator/version of "40 verses on Reality" Dear Richard, This is the version from the Mountain Path journal, its somewhere on their website, I'll look for it. Gloria - Richard Clarke RamanaMaharshi Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:13 PM [RamanaMaharshi] Which translator/version of "40 verses on Reality" Dear Group, SAT wants to put a version of "40 verses" in their web site, which they are redoing now. The version that starts as below is a very nice translation (obviously of the original Tamil version, not an english translation of the Sankrit translation done by Ganapati Muni). Does any one know the translator and publisher of the version that starts below? (I find it one of the best of the translations. SAT does not want to use any translation that cannot be identified as to translator, etc., though) Invocation i. If Reality did not exist, could there be any knowledge of existence? Free from all thoughts, Reality abides in the Heart, the Source of all thoughts. It is, therefore, called the Heart. How then is one to contemplate it? To be as it is in the Heart, is Its contemplation. ii. Those who know intense fear of death seek refuge only at the feet of the Lord Who has neither death nor birth. Dead to themselves and their possessions, can the thought of death occur to them again? Deathless are they. 1. From our perception of the world there follows acceptance of a unique First Principle possessing various powers. Pictures of name and form, the person who sees, the screen on which he sees, and the light by which he sees: he himself is all of these. Invocatory i. If Reality did not exist, could there be any knowledge of existence? Free from all thoughts, Reality abides in the Heart, the Source of all thoughts. It is, therefore, called the Heart. How then is one to contemplate it? To be as it is in the Heart, is Its contemplation. ii. Those who know intense fear of death seek refuge only at the feet of the Lord Who has neither death nor birth. Dead to themselves and their possessions, can the thought of death occur to them again? Deathless are they. Verses 1. From our perception of the world there follows acceptance of a unique First Principle possessing various powers. Pictures of name and form, the person who sees, the screen on which he sees, and the light by which he sees: he himself is all of these. 2. All religions postulate the three fundamentals, the world, the soul, and God, but it is only the one Reality that manifests Itself as these three. One can say, 'The three are really three' only so long as the ego lasts. Therefore, to inhere in one's own Being, where the 'I', or ego, is dead, is the perfect State. Thank you. We are Not two, Richard Post message: RamanaMaharshi Subscribe: RamanaMaharshi- Un: RamanaMaharshi- List owner: RamanaMaharshi-owner Shortcut URL to this page: /community/RamanaMaharshi Sponsor Post message: RamanaMaharshi Subscribe: RamanaMaharshi- Un: RamanaMaharshi- List owner: RamanaMaharshi-owner Shortcut URL to this page: /community/RamanaMaharshi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Dear Richard, Gloria has nailed this one down but it might be useful to mention, just for future reference, that it's now possible to answer questions of this type almost instantly through the use of Google. Simply take a phrase from the article (a phrase which is unlikely to appear in any other article), enclose it in quotes, and search for it in Google. By the way... did you consider T.M.P. Mahadevan's translation of "40 Verses" which is included in his book "Ramana Maharshi and His Philosophy of Existence"? It would be great to place that whole book on the web. I believe Sri Ramanashramam holds the copyright. Rob RamanaMaharshi, "Richard Clarke" <r_clarke@i...> wrote: > Dear Group, > > SAT wants to put a version of "40 verses" in their web site, which Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Dear Gloria, Thank you, that is exactly what I needed. We are Not two, Richard RamanaMaharshi, "Gloria Lee" <glee@c...> wrote: > http://www.ramana-maharshi.org/m_path/1964_4/october.htm > > This issue is also edited by Arthur Osborne, so its a confirmation. > > http://www.ramana-maharshi.org/m_path/1964_4/forty.htm > - > Gloria Lee > RM > Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:48 AM > [RamanaMaharshi] Re: Which translator/version of "40 verses on Reality" > > > Dear Richard, > > This is the version from the Mountain Path journal, its somewhere > on their website, I'll look for it. > > Gloria > > - > Richard Clarke > RamanaMaharshi > Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:13 PM > [RamanaMaharshi] Which translator/version of "40 verses on Reality" > > > Dear Group, > > SAT wants to put a version of "40 verses" in their web site, which > they are redoing now. The version that starts as below is a very > nice translation (obviously of the original Tamil version, not an > english translation of the Sankrit translation done by Ganapati Muni). > > Does any one know the translator and publisher of the version that > starts below? (I find it one of the best of the translations. SAT > does not want to use any translation that cannot be identified as to > translator, etc., though) > > Invocation > i. If Reality did not exist, could there be any knowledge of > existence? Free from all thoughts, Reality abides in the Heart, the > Source of all thoughts. It is, therefore, called the Heart. How then > is one to contemplate it? To be as it is in the Heart, is Its > contemplation. > > ii. Those who know intense fear of death seek refuge only at the feet > of the Lord Who has neither death nor birth. Dead to themselves and > their possessions, can the thought of death occur to them again? > Deathless are they. > > 1. From our perception of the world there follows acceptance of a > unique First Principle possessing various powers. Pictures of name > and form, the person who sees, the screen on which he sees, and the > light by which he sees: he himself is all of these. > > Invocatory > > i. If Reality did not exist, could there be any knowledge of existence? Free > from all thoughts, Reality abides in the Heart, the Source of all thoughts. > It is, therefore, called the Heart. How then is one to contemplate it? To be > as it is in the Heart, is Its contemplation. > ii. Those who know intense fear of death seek refuge only at the feet of the > Lord Who has neither death nor birth. Dead to themselves and their > possessions, can the thought of death occur to them again? Deathless are > they. > > Verses > > 1. From our perception of the world there follows acceptance of a unique > First Principle possessing various powers. Pictures of name and form, the > person who sees, the screen on which he sees, and the light by which he > sees: he himself is all of these. > > > > > 2. All religions postulate the three fundamentals, the world, the > soul, and God, but it is only the one Reality that manifests Itself > as these three. One can say, 'The three are really three' only so > long as the ego lasts. Therefore, to inhere in one's own Being, where > the 'I', or ego, is dead, is the perfect State. > > Thank you. > > We are Not two, > Richard > > > > > > Post message: RamanaMaharshi@o... > Subscribe: RamanaMaharshi-@o... > Un: RamanaMaharshi-@o... > List owner: RamanaMaharshi-owner@o... > > Shortcut URL to this page: > /community/RamanaMaharshi > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > Post message: RamanaMaharshi@o... > Subscribe: RamanaMaharshi-@o... > Un: RamanaMaharshi-@o... > List owner: RamanaMaharshi-owner@o... > > Shortcut URL to this page: > /community/RamanaMaharshi > > Terms of Service. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Dear Alan, Thank you. This is what I needed. (I can't at the moment find my copy of "Collected works" though). Certainly "40 Verses" is a wonderful and deep exposition of Ramana's teaching. In the last day of the recent 5-day SAT retreat, we were read both a translation from the Tamil version and from the Sanskrit version of "40 verses" and given commentary on each version. This was wonderful, and a great way to end the retreat. WE are Not two, Richard RamanaMaharshi, Alan Jacobs <alanadamsjacobs> wrote: > dear Richard , this translation appears in the Collected Works of Ramana Maharshi Edited and > compiled by Arthur Osborne , Rider and Co. 1959 . One assumes Osborne was the trasnslator - he > does not state otherwise .There have been several editions since . .He says this and the > Supplement are the most comprehensive exposition of Maharshi's teaching .Regards Alan > > > > > > --- Richard Clarke <r_clarke@i...> wrote: > <HR> > <html><body> > > > <tt> > Dear Group,<BR> > <BR> > SAT wants to put a version of "40 verses" in their web site, which <BR> > they are redoing now. The version that starts as below is a very <BR> > nice translation (obviously of the original Tamil version, not an <BR> > english translation of the Sankrit translation done by Ganapati Muni).<BR> > <BR> > Does any one know the translator and publisher of the version that <BR> > starts below? (I find it one of the best of the translations. SAT <BR> > does not want to use any translation that cannot be identified as to <BR> > translator, etc., though)<BR> > <BR> > Invocation<BR> > i. If Reality did not exist, could there be any knowledge of <BR> > existence? Free from all thoughts, Reality abides in the Heart, the <BR> > Source of all thoughts. It is, therefore, called the Heart. How then <BR> > is one to contemplate it? To be as it is in the Heart, is Its <BR> > contemplation.<BR> > <BR> > ii. Those who know intense fear of death seek refuge only at the feet <BR> > of the Lord Who has neither death nor birth. Dead to themselves and <BR> > their possessions, can the thought of death occur to them again? <BR> > Deathless are they.<BR> > <BR> > 1. From our perception of the world there follows acceptance of a <BR> > unique First Principle possessing various powers. Pictures of name <BR> > and form, the person who sees, the screen on which he sees, and the <BR> > light by which he sees: he himself is all of these.<BR> > <BR> > 2. All religions postulate the three fundamentals, the world, the <BR> > soul, and God, but it is only the one Reality that manifests Itself <BR> > as these three. One can say, 'The three are really three' only so <BR> > long as the ego lasts. Therefore, to inhere in one's own Being, where <BR> > the 'I', or ego, is dead, is the perfect State.<BR> > <BR> > Thank you.<BR> > <BR> > We are Not two,<BR> > Richard<BR> > <BR> > <BR> > <BR> > </tt> > > > <br> > <tt> > <BR> > Post message: RamanaMaharshi@o...<BR> > Subscribe: RamanaMaharshi- @o...<BR> > Un: RamanaMaharshi-@o...<BR> > List owner: RamanaMaharshi-owner@o...<BR> > <BR> > Shortcut URL to this page:<BR> > <a > href="/community/RamanaMaharshi"> > Terms of Service</a>.</tt> > </br> > > </body></html> > > > > > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.''>http://uk.my.'>http://uk.my. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Dear Rob, Thank you for your comments. I did look on Google, I looked for "40 verses" though and not a phrase from the version I was looking for. Good idea! I do not know the T.M.P. Mahadevan translation (nor that specific book). Maybe there is a copy in the SAT library. Do you know of one that is posted on the web? I searched and found his translation of the Q&A version of "Who am I?" but not "40 verses." We are Not two, Richard RamanaMaharshi, "Rob Sacks" <editor@r...> wrote: > Dear Richard, > > Gloria has nailed this one down but it might > be useful to mention, just for future reference, > that it's now possible to answer questions of > this type almost instantly through the use of > Google. > > Simply take a phrase from the article (a > phrase which is unlikely to appear in any other > article), enclose it in quotes, and search for > it in Google. > > By the way... did you consider T.M.P. Mahadevan's > translation of "40 Verses" which is included in his > book "Ramana Maharshi and His Philosophy of > Existence"? > > It would be great to place that whole book on the > web. I believe Sri Ramanashramam holds the > copyright. > > Rob > > > RamanaMaharshi, "Richard Clarke" <r_clarke@i...> wrote: > > Dear Group, > > > > SAT wants to put a version of "40 verses" in their web site, which Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Dear Richard, Excerpts of the book, but not the whole thing, can be found on the Sri Ramanasramam website. The book is published by Sri Ramansramam and can be purchased from them, or from Arunachala Ashrama in the US. For folks who don't know about T.M.P. Mahadevan, he was a leading academic expert on Advaita (a professor of philosophy at a major university) and also a devotee of Bhagavan. So far as I know, this makes him unique. The book is a compilation of various writings by Mahadevan on Bhagavan and Advaita. It includes: -- English translation of 40 Verses. -- English translation of the Supplement to 40 Verses. -- Commentaries on 40 Verses and the Supplement. -- Mahadevan's short biography of Bhagavan. -- Four essays about Bhagavan by Mahadevan. -- Tamil texts of 40 Verses and the Supplement in transliterated Roman type. -- A glossary of Sanskrit words. The book is worth buying just to have any single one of its contents. For example, take the glossary. I think it's invaluable because it's the only glossary I've found of technical Sanskrit terms used in Advaitic philosophy that is written by somebody who has both academic and experiential expertise in the subject. I sometimes think that many Westerners who are interested in Advaita would be shocked to look at the canonical works of Advaita, particularly Shankaracharya's "Brahma Sutra Bhasya". It's academic philosophy; it's like reading Kant. I don't mean to suggest that this kind of knowledge is necessary in order to practice (the sages tell us over and over that it's not only not necessary, but it's counter- productive). But for folks who are interested in the theoretical stuff, they might as well get it from truly informed sources like Mahadevan. Rob RamanaMaharshi, "Richard Clarke" <r_clarke@i...> wrote: > Dear Rob, > > Thank you for your comments. I did look on Google, I looked for "40 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Dear Richard and Rob , I believe the Mahadevan Translation is in a book by him entitled' Ramana Maharshi and the Philosophy of Existence'.It has a philosophic commentary .He was professor of Advanced Philosophy University of Madras ., before he died .Regards , Alan --- Richard Clarke <r_clarke wrote: <HR> <html><body> <tt> Dear Rob,<BR> <BR> Thank you for your comments. I did look on Google, I looked for "40 <BR> verses" though and not a phrase from the version I was looking for. <BR> Good idea!<BR> <BR> I do not know the T.M.P. Mahadevan translation (nor that specific <BR> book). Maybe there is a copy in the SAT library. Do you know of one <BR> that is posted on the web? I searched and found his translation of <BR> the Q&A version of "Who am I?" but not "40 verses."<BR> <BR> <BR> We are Not two,<BR> Richard<BR> RamanaMaharshi, "Rob Sacks" <editor@r...> wrote:<BR> > Dear Richard,<BR> > <BR> > Gloria has nailed this one down but it might<BR> > be useful to mention, just for future reference,<BR> > that it's now possible to answer questions of<BR> > this type almost instantly through the use of<BR> > Google.<BR> > <BR> > Simply take a phrase from the article (a<BR> > phrase which is unlikely to appear in any other<BR> > article), enclose it in quotes, and search for<BR> > it in Google.<BR> > <BR> > By the way... did you consider T.M.P. Mahadevan's<BR> > translation of "40 Verses" which is included in his<BR> > book "Ramana Maharshi and His Philosophy of <BR> > Existence"? <BR> > <BR> > It would be great to place that whole book on the<BR> > web. I believe Sri Ramanashramam holds the <BR> > copyright.<BR> > <BR> > Rob<BR> > <BR> > <BR> > RamanaMaharshi, "Richard Clarke" <r_clarke@i...> wrote:<BR> > > Dear Group,<BR> > > <BR> > > SAT wants to put a version of "40 verses" in their web site, which<BR> <BR> </tt> <br> <tt> <BR> Post message: RamanaMaharshi <BR> Subscribe: RamanaMaharshi- <BR> Un: RamanaMaharshi- <BR> List owner: RamanaMaharshi-owner <BR> <BR> Shortcut URL to this page:<BR> <a href="/community/RamanaMaharshi"> Terms of Service</a>.</tt> </br> </body></html> Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.''>http://uk.my.'>http://uk.my. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2002 Report Share Posted November 22, 2002 Dearest Vicki, It's wonderful to see you here again also. Especially with this great rush of love that accompanies you. Disappear... it will probably happen again, and then it will unhappen again. I like your new name: . Love, Rob RamanaMaharshi, "viorica weissman" <viorica@z...> wrote: > dear Rob, > as usual in great appreciation of your answers; > great pleasure to see you are back on the list and hope > you are not going to dissappear again; > love from bhaktaX to bhakta0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2002 Report Share Posted November 22, 2002 Dear Jiva, You silly fellow. Why are you trying to shock everybody and make them dislike you? You are obviously drawn here by Bhagavan, like the rest of us, and you should try to stay here. People here are predisposed to admire you and shower you with affection. In case the moderators are considering banning you, I'd like to point out to them that gives them the option to make any particular person's messages "moderated" (so that they appear publicly only after a moderator approves each one individually) even though the group as a whole is set to "unmoderated." It would be extra work for them, but perhaps they will consider it. Rob RamanaMaharshi, "Jiva Das" <jivadas@h...> wrote: > Seems like Rob wants to... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2002 Report Share Posted November 22, 2002 Dear Rob: Your suggestion about putting Jiva on moderation is a very Ramana loving one. I am sure that Ramana would not ban anyone. Then we could still show Jiva that we love him. You know that I was banned on the Harsha group for asking Harsha some persistent questions about his realization on His group. When I channeled Ramana it was too much for him or his moderators so I got the ooopps your banned. Harsha still wont relate to me even though I said I was wrong. I guess it was a lifetime sentence. In this country that kills murderers they sometimes set them free when they repent. Funny world huh? Love, Alton who want to be "The Self" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.