Guest guest Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 Dear Group, I was asked in a private email to comment on my practice, after I talked about trying early morning meditation. Two comments follow. After reading a post by Linda Sherman about early morning inquiry I have changed my daily routine. I have meditated in the morning for several years now as a regular part of each day. Now I get up a little earlier, about 5AM, and immediately, after relieving my bladder, sit in inquiry. What I find already is that the mind is quieter, and the meditations are then naturally deeper. The meditations naturally last longer than before. I now continue with the old morning routine and meditate again at about 6:30. I have to say that I like this, and will continue it. Though it is recommend by many teachers, I am not able to 'catch' the mind when it rises. This mind comes on with a 'snap' when I wake. Starting the first meditation as soon as I can there after does seem to help. One other comment: As I have written about, my teacher has encouraged me to combine inquiry and discrimination. He says that Knowledge (or the Absolute or whatever way you want to name that which contains all names and has no name) is who we are already, so Self-realization is not a matter of gaining anything, but rather a matter of knowledge (at the same inner level as the knowledge that you have that you exist) of the fact that all that you imagine is binding you is but an illusion, and imagination. Get rid of the ignorance, and all that is left is the Self. For the last four months I have been slowly discriminating my way from gross to subtle -- slowly. Until a couple of weeks ago I stayed with "Who am I?Am I this body?" Ramana says that chief among the misidentifications is the "I am the body" notion. After some months of this meditation, the inquiry was taking me often directly to Consciousness, rather than identification with the body. I asked about this in satsang. Nome suggested that I continue the discrimination, only this time go to the next step inward and see if I am these senses. He also suggested the next step as well, am I this mind (and world imagined by this mind). While inquiring to dissolve the mind is appealing (and something that I find resonance with in my practice), I know by now that I must take this slowly, one step at a time. No now the inquiry goes a little like this: Who am I? Am I this body? Someone knows this body? Who knows this body? Who am I? This body changes. Who I am does not. Am I this body? Who am I? Of course this does not show the silence after the "Who am I?" I think the silence is more important than the question. This silence is not one where the mind 'rests' comfortably in some identity or something that is known. Enough for now. Perhaps this may be of interest or useful to some. We are not two, Richard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 Dear Richard: It's always appreciated when someone on this group shares their practice. Also, spiritual seekers ask questions, offer information and share what they are doing as far as practice. They never tell anyone what they are doing is wrong. Here are some questions and stuff. What time do you go to sleep at night? If one follows the recommendations for health and energy that the acupuncturists and Chinese herbalists offer, then 10 pm is the right time for body maintenance. So it you do go to sleep around that time, are you able to sleep right through to 5 am? If you happen to wake before then, do you then start your meditation at that time or do you try to go back to sleep? Some of my teachers in the past have suggested 3 am as the best time to start meditating. If we go to sleep at 10 pm then we get 5 hours sleep if we wake at 3 am. Another question: Do you time your sittings? This week I decided to cover the clock and take off my watch. What ever time I awake I then start my meditation. Last night I estimate it was around 1 or 2 am. I sat until my body was hurting to much and then did lying down meditation until I dozed off. Then at around 6 am I did another sitting. It would be great to eat, sleep and meditate when one is moved to do so. Of course if one had to hold a job to support oneself and one's family that is not practical. Since my dialogues with Miles about progress, I have loosened up lots and the only goal I have is to sit each day as much as feasible. Also, I have given up using words to keep my mind from talking to itself incessantly. It seems to be working. For years everytime I tried to do the " I AM' without words, I believed that I was not ready for it. Someday I would like to give up using any means of time or day or date in my life. Aloha, Alton Dear Group,I was asked in a private email to comment on my practice, after I talked about trying early morning meditation. Two comments follow. After reading a post by Linda Sherman about early morning inquiry I have changed my daily routine. I have meditated in the morning for several years now as a regular part of each day. Now I get up a little earlier, about 5AM, and immediately, after relieving my bladder, sit in inquiry. What I find already is that the mind is quieter, and the meditations are then naturally deeper. The meditations naturally last longer than before. I now continue with the old morning routine and meditate again at about 6:30. I have to say that I like this, and will continue it. Though it is recommend by many teachers, I am not able to 'catch' the mind when it rises. This mind comes on with a 'snap' when I wake. Starting the first meditation as soon as I can there after does seem to help. One other comment: As I have written about, my teacher has encouraged me to combine inquiry and discrimination. He says that Knowledge (or the Absolute or whatever way you want to name that which contains all names and has no name) is who we are already, so Self-realization is not a matter of gaining anything, but rather a matter of knowledge (at the same inner level as the knowledge that you have that you exist) of the fact that all that you imagine is binding you is but an illusion, and imagination. Get rid of the ignorance, and all that is left is the Self.For the last four months I have been slowly discriminating my way from gross to subtle -- slowly. Until a couple of weeks ago I stayed with "Who am I?Am I this body?" Ramana says that chief among the misidentifications is the "I am the body" notion. After some months of this meditation, the inquiry was taking me often directly to Consciousness, rather than identification with the body. I asked about this in satsang. Nome suggested that I continue the discrimination, only this time go to the next step inward and see if I am these senses. He also suggested the next step as well, am I this mind (and world imagined by this mind).While inquiring to dissolve the mind is appealing (and something that I find resonance with in my practice), I know by now that I must take this slowly, one step at a time. No now the inquiry goes a little like this: Who am I? Am I this body? Someone knows this body? Who knows this body? Who am I?This body changes. Who I am does not. Am I this body? Who am I? Of course this does not show the silence after the "Who am I?" I think the silence is more important than the question. This silence is not one where the mind 'rests' comfortably in some identity or something that is known. Enough for now. Perhaps this may be of interest or useful to some.We are not two,Richard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 Sopmetimes obliterates part of a post. So, if you highlight is with select all or the mouse you then can read it. Om Namo Bhagavate Sri Ramanaya, Alton RamanaMaharshi, "UNBOUND" <unbound@h...> wrote: > > Dear Richard: > It's always appreciated when someone on this group shares their practice. > > Also, spiritual seekers ask questions, offer information and share what they are doing as far as practice. They never tell anyone what they are doing is wrong. > > Here are some questions and stuff. > What time do you go to sleep at night? If one follows the recommendations for health and energy that the acupuncturists and Chinese herbalists offer, then 10 pm is the right time for body maintenance. So it you do go to sleep around that time, are you able to sleep right through to 5 am? If you happen to wake before then, do you then start your meditation at that time or do you try to go back to sleep? Some of my teachers in the past have suggested 3 am as the best time to start meditating. If we go to sleep at 10 pm then we get 5 hours sleep if we wake at 3 am. > > Another question: Do you time your sittings? > > This week I decided to cover the clock and take off my watch. What ever time I awake I then start my meditation. Last night I estimate it was around 1 or 2 am. I sat until my body was hurting to much and then did lying down meditation until I dozed off. Then at around 6 am I did another sitting. It would be great to eat, sleep and meditate when one is moved to do so. Of course if one had to hold a job to support oneself and one's family that is not practical. > > Since my dialogues with Miles about progress, I have loosened up lots and the only goal I have is to sit each day as much as feasible. > > Also, I have given up using words to keep my mind from talking to itself incessantly. It seems to be working. For years everytime I tried to do the " I AM' without words, I believed that I was not ready for it. > Someday I would like to give up using any means of time or day or date in my life. > > Aloha, > Alton > > > Dear Group, > > I was asked in a private email to comment on my practice, after I > talked about trying early morning meditation. Two comments follow. > > After reading a post by Linda Sherman about early morning inquiry I > have changed my daily routine. I have meditated in the morning for > several years now as a regular part of each day. Now I get up a > little earlier, about 5AM, and immediately, after relieving my > bladder, sit in inquiry. > > What I find already is that the mind is quieter, and the meditations > are then naturally deeper. The meditations naturally last longer than > before. > > I now continue with the old morning routine and meditate again at > about 6:30. > > I have to say that I like this, and will continue it. > > Though it is recommend by many teachers, I am not able to 'catch' the > mind when it rises. This mind comes on with a 'snap' when I wake. > Starting the first meditation as soon as I can there after does seem > to help. > > One other comment: As I have written about, my teacher has > encouraged me to combine inquiry and discrimination. He says that > Knowledge (or the Absolute or whatever way you want to name that > which contains all names and has no name) is who we are already, so > Self-realization is not a matter of gaining anything, but rather a > matter of knowledge (at the same inner level as the knowledge that > you have that you exist) of the fact that all that you imagine is > binding you is but an illusion, and imagination. Get rid of the > ignorance, and all that is left is the Self. > > For the last four months I have been slowly discriminating my way > from gross to subtle -- slowly. Until a couple of weeks ago I stayed > with "Who am I?Am I this body?" Ramana says that chief among the > misidentifications is the "I am the body" notion. > > After some months of this meditation, the inquiry was taking me often > directly to Consciousness, rather than identification with the body. > I asked about this in satsang. Nome suggested that I continue the > discrimination, only this time go to the next step inward and see if > I am these senses. He also suggested the next step as well, am I > this mind (and world imagined by this mind). > > While inquiring to dissolve the mind is appealing (and something that > I find resonance with in my practice), I know by now that I must take > this slowly, one step at a time. > > No now the inquiry goes a little like this: > Who am I? > Am I this body? Someone knows this body? Who knows this body? > Who am I? > This body changes. Who I am does not. Am I this body? > Who am I? > > Of course this does not show the silence after the "Who am I?" I > think the silence is more important than the question. This silence > is not one where the mind 'rests' comfortably in some identity or > something that is known. > > Enough for now. Perhaps this may be of interest or useful to some. > > We are not two, > Richard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Dear Alton, Some responses: I go to sleep about 11PM each night. I sleep until about 5AM. And easily sleep through the night. I awaken without alarms naturally. I do not time the sittings. I have no clock or watch that is visible from the places where I meditate. I sit each time until the meditation is naturally through. There is, I strongly suspect, a mental aspect of this timing, though. I have tried meditation when lying down, but, like you, have found that it is difficult to maintain the meditative focus. So I sit. I know from previous postings that you find your mind to be `noisy.' I have noticed that my mind has gotten quieter over the years of my practice. I am grateful for this! You also talk about pain when meditating. I sometimes have this as well. I have pretty much stopped meditating on the floor or a pillow because of knee pain. And I have had back pain since the days of high school football. And some of my best meditations were ones in which there was pain, but my attention was on something much deeper than the pain, and it did not matter so much. Pain is not the problem, rather it is giving pain the kind of attention that makes it more real, it is attachment to and identification with the pain that is the problem. Maybe after some more months of my working on my own misidentification with the senses, then my own attachment to pain will become less important to me. I have a family to support and work, so have needs to also fit meditation and inquiry within that context. Ramana taught that it is not needed to be a monk, that inquiry makes not difference what ones `does.' (Thank goodness!) I think it is beneficial not to be so concerned about progress (though my own sense of progress makes it much easier to continue to keep the focus on practice. I think keeping this focus is important. One of Sankara's famous "Requisites for Realization" is "Desire for Liberation."). The one thing I would say to your comment is that it may not be needed to spend all the time sitting. What matters is whether one's focus is on "things" or the Self. What matters is the inward turned mind. Keep it turned within and finally it will come to the full Knowledge of the Self. Enough for now. We are not two, Richard RamanaMaharshi, "UNBOUND" <unbound@h...> wrote: > > Dear Richard: > It's always appreciated when someone on this group shares their practice. > > Also, spiritual seekers ask questions, offer information and share what they are doing as far as practice. They never tell anyone what they are doing is wrong. > > Here are some questions and stuff. > What time do you go to sleep at night? If one follows the recommendations for health and energy that the acupuncturists and Chinese herbalists offer, then 10 pm is the right time for body maintenance. So it you do go to sleep around that time, are you able to sleep right through to 5 am? If you happen to wake before then, do you then start your meditation at that time or do you try to go back to sleep? Some of my teachers in the past have suggested 3 am as the best time to start meditating. If we go to sleep at 10 pm then we get 5 hours sleep if we wake at 3 am. > > Another question: Do you time your sittings? > > This week I decided to cover the clock and take off my watch. Whatever time I awake I then start my meditation. Last night I estimate it was around 1 or 2 am. I sat until my body was hurting to much and then did lying down meditation until I dozed off. Then at around 6 am I did another sitting. It would be great to eat, sleep and meditate when one is moved to do so. Of course if one had to hold a job to support oneself and one's family that is not practical. > > Since my dialogues with Miles about progress, I have loosened up lots and the only goal I have is to sit each day as much as feasible. > > Also, I have given up using words to keep my mind from talking to itself incessantly. It seems to be working. For years everytime I tried to do the " I AM' without words, I believed that I was not ready for it. > Someday I would like to give up using any means of time or day or date in my life. > > Aloha, > Alton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Dear Guruji When we meditate will it not be better to sit on a plank 3 inches (7.5cms ) thick so that spinal pain can be avoided. This may be the reason in olden days for all Poojas the priests used to sit on planks. There were different thickness of planks acoording to the age and time of poojas. In my house 10 types of planks were there thickness varying from 2 inches to 6 icnhes. There was a custom that brahmins should not sit on floors sit only on planks we say Avani Palakas. My friend Doctor also agrered to this idea. In my experience this has given a good effect Pl. Clarify. Bhattathiry----- Original Message ----- Richard Clarke RamanaMaharshi Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:14 PM [RamanaMaharshi] Re: Practice Dear Alton,Some responses:I go to sleep about 11PM each night. I sleep until about 5AM. And easily sleep through the night. I awaken without alarms naturally. I do not time the sittings. I have no clock or watch that is visible from the places where I meditate. I sit each time until the meditation is naturally through. There is, I strongly suspect, a mental aspect of this timing, though. I have tried meditation when lying down, but, like you, have found that it is difficult to maintain the meditative focus. So I sit. I know from previous postings that you find your mind to be `noisy.' I have noticed that my mind has gotten quieter over the years of my practice. I am grateful for this! You also talk about pain when meditating. I sometimes have this as well. I have pretty much stopped meditating on the floor or a pillow because of knee pain. And I have had back pain since the days of high school football. And some of my best meditations were ones in which there was pain, but my attention was on something much deeper than the pain, and it did not matter so much. Pain is not the problem, rather it is giving pain the kind of attention that makes it more real, it is attachment to and identification with the pain that is the problem. Maybe after some more months of my working on my own misidentification with the senses, then my own attachment to pain will become less important to me. I have a family to support and work, so have needs to also fit meditation and inquiry within that context. Ramana taught that it is not needed to be a monk, that inquiry makes not difference what ones `does.' (Thank goodness!)I think it is beneficial not to be so concerned about progress (though my own sense of progress makes it much easier to continue to keep the focus on practice. I think keeping this focus is important. One of Sankara's famous "Requisites for Realization" is "Desire for Liberation."). The one thing I would say to your comment is that it may not be needed to spend all the time sitting. What matters is whether one's focus is on "things" or the Self. What matters is the inward turned mind. Keep it turned within and finally it will come to the full Knowledge of the Self. Enough for now.We are not two,Richard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Dear Bhattathirty, I agree. Sitting on a cushion or something else stabilizes the sitting- position. So in Zen. The body is really like a "rock". This helps the mind also to fasten and concentrate and becoming one-pointed. In the last retreat I became rid of all back-problems because of this straight sitting position (a nice side-effect). Formerly longer stretches of sitting meditation has also been painful: knees, back (most of all the back). I really enjoy as a good aid. Richard, what you say about pains during sitting: that the pain itself is not the problem - this is a common view in Zen also. One is forced to learn to accept - that's then a part of the training. During a strict Sesshin most people have to suffer - some really enormously - and there is no way out (moving or any change of the sitting position is not allowed). So one needs to go through. One can accept it as an expression of the Self and embrace it lovingly. Then pains can become a source of inner strenght also. For practicing atma vichara this all is not necessary at all - but it can be an aid for some. In Sri Ramana Gabriele RamanaMaharshi, Bhattathity M P <mpmahesh@a...> wrote: > Dear Guruji > When we meditate will it not be better to sit on a plank 3 inches (7.5cms ) thick so that spinal pain can be avoided. This may be the reason in olden days for all Poojas the priests used to sit on planks. There were different thickness of planks acoording to the age and time of poojas. In my house 10 types of planks were there thickness varying from 2 inches to 6 icnhes. There was a custom that brahmins should not sit on floors sit only on planks we say Avani Palakas. My friend Doctor also agrered to this idea. In my experience this has given a good effect Pl. Clarify. > Bhattathiry----- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.