Guest guest Posted April 8, 2003 Report Share Posted April 8, 2003 Bhagavan replied: Certainly, it is a matter of fitness of mind. Married or unmarried, a man can realise the Self, because that is here and now. If it were not so, but attainable by some efforts at some other time, and if it were new and something to be acquired, it would not be worthy of pursuit. Because what is not natural cannot be permanent either. But what I say is that the Self is here and now and alone. (from Talks; 17) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2003 Report Share Posted April 10, 2003 either this was read somewhere or may be someone said this to me , anyway I am reminded of this: The sanyasi who things he is a sanyasi is not a sanyasi but A householder who knows he is not the householder is not a householder but is a sanyasi. another teenie-weenie (short) story: King who is not used to subjects ignoring him meets a sadhu on the wayside. sadhu minds his business not noticing the king; king gets curious and a bit angry. king says "I have come to see you" sadhu doesn't say anything waves 'go' kings asks 'when should I come' ("eppo varanum ?") sadhu says "after I die" ("naan seththa piragu") king says : "you arrogant fellow, what is the point in coming after you are dead, how can I talk to you then?" sadhu says : "fool, come after the 'I' in you dies" ("muttal, naan engira aganthai seththa piragu vaa" king prostrates and leaves. thanks and love to you all , Murthy RamanaMaharshi, Miles Wright <ramana.bhakta@v...> wrote: > > > Bhagavan replied: > Certainly, it is a matter of fitness of mind. Married or unmarried, a man > can realise the Self, because that is here and now. If it were not so, but Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.