Guest guest Posted August 2, 2003 Report Share Posted August 2, 2003 In the Vedic pantheon the god of Fire is 'agni-dEva'. He is a very important and sacred one. No Vedic ritual ("yagnya") can normally be undertaken without 'agni-dEvata'. This 'dEva' is a benign god bestowing upon the whole world the comfort of warmth, protection against dark dangers, the blessings of good health and the wholesomeness of spirit... The 7-tongued flame of 'agni' ("sapta-jihvA") that glow inside a sacrificial mound of fire are reverentially tended to in the ancient Vedic rite called 'nitya-agni-hOtra". The fire that appears in such a sacred rite is worshipped as a 'dEva'... only because it is firmly 'controlled' by the restraint of 'dama'... Yet, 'agni', the same 'dEvata', is feared and loathed whenever he is seen to lose self-control or 'dama'. A wild forest-fire that goes berserk is everybody's nemesis. An accidental fire that suddenly blazes out of control is everybody's nightmare. An inferno brings about tragedy and death on an epic scale... No one ever calls such malevolent, uncontrollable Fire as 'agni-dEvata'... ************ In the 'Srimadh-Bhagavatham', a Vedic 'purANa' of lofty spiritual values and insights, there is the story of Hiranyakasipu, the great 'asurA' who had no 'dayA', not an iota of compassion, in his heart... not even for his little child. Hiranyakasipu's little son, Prahlada, a mere boy of six years, in spite of the father's best, and often violent efforts, could not just be weaned away from his religious conviction that the the Almighty was none else than Srimann-Narayana. The father furiously resented the son's faith. He wished the boy would instead recognize and defer to Hiranyakasipu's own power and glory... he being, as he was, the monarch of all that he surveyed. The 'asura' was indeed a great one... he had attained superhuman powers and qualities by dint of long and severe austerity, will and labour. He had conquered empires and subjugated peoples all over the world. He believed he was entitled to the obeisance of all. Why his son alone should think otherwise and persist in his apostasy in search of another God, another faith was beyond Hiranyakasipu's understanding. After subjecting the little child to all manner of oppression and torment only to make him somehow recant, and meeting with no success whatsoever, the 'asura' finally decided to have Prahlada murdered in cold blood by his own palace courtiers. The story of the 'Bhagavatham' tells us that the 'asura' King possessed all great and noble qualities behoving a world leader. Except one. 'dayA', compassion... He lacked the unique compassion which normally would move any father's heart, however steely, towards his child no matter how errant or wayward the little one may be. And for the one solitary virtue that mighty Hiranyakasipu lacked, he paid penalty with his own life in the end... at the hands of God Himself. *************** There is another story in the Bhagavatham which tells the story of a 'manushya' and the Upanishadic virtue of 'datta' or 'dAna'. It is the story of Sudama (also well known by his alias, Kuchela). This man was a good Brahmin who had a loving wife. The couple had lovable children. They were all living a modest but happy life... until one day they woke up to the rude reality that they were destitute. The children's next meal was an uncertain prospect and Sudama desperately had to do something. Brahmins are generally not obliged to give alms. They are sanctioned by Vedic scripture ("sAstra"), in fact, to receive charity. Looking around for a kind donor in town to help the family in dire straits, Kuchela's wife suggested the husband should try knocking on the royal doors of his old friend and school-mate, Lord Krishna, whom Kuchela had not met for several years. Kuchela the Brahmin, thus set out, a trifle reluctantly, on the mission to seek alms from his old boyhood friend and benefactor, Krishna. Krishna and his queens, Rukmini and Satyabhama, received Kuchela into the royal quarters with all the courtesy due to an old friend... but no more. They feasted him, entertained him and Krishna recollected all their pleasant boyhood memories. And then, quickly enough, it was time for the guest to go. The Lord and consorts politely prepared to take leave of him and Sudama knew it was the moment to exit. A sense of shame overtook him and prevented him from disclosing to his host the real purpose of the visit. Kuchela resigned himself to returning empty-handed to his wife -- his mission an utter failure. On his way out, Kuchela suddenly remembered he had brought with him a little gift meant for Krishna... just for old times sake. It was a little pack of rice-bran. In his boyhood days, Kuchela had remembered, Krishna had relished bran so much as an afternoon snack. "Oh, Krishna, I almost forgot", said Kuchela as he took leave, "Here is some rice-bran I brought for you! I remembered how much you'd enjoyed bran snack back in those young days! Here, please accept this". The Bhagavatham recounts how Krishna received the little gift of rice-bran with overjoy! He embraced his poor Brahmin friend for the kindness. The overjoy, notwithstanding, the Bhagavatam records that Krishna still let the poor Sudama return home empty-handed. It was when the Brahmin journeyed back home, however, that the miracle happened! Kuchela's shabby hutment turned into a grand mansion with liveried servants on call! His wife and children were no longer in tatters! They were dressed in finest silks and all decked up in brilliant gold! Sudama was invited into his own opulent quarters by a bevy of hand-maidens who showered petals upon him, washed his feet with perfume, laid out a moonlit banquet for him with serenading bards in attendance..! Sudama and his family lived happily thereafter! A 'manushyA's' single act of 'datta' or 'dAna' had possessed enough power to work God's own miracle upon Sudama... ************ Although the story in the BrhadAranyaka Upanishad gives us the impression that Prajapati is addressing 'dEva', 'manushya' and 'asura' separately, as if they were three distinctive individuals, actually it is Man alone, the 'manushya', who is being addressed here. It would be quite tempting otherwise to conclude that the virtues of self-control and compassion are of little concern to Man since, as Prajapati himself makes it appear in the story, "dama" and "dayA" are for celestials and demons to worry about! In the story "dEva" and "asura" are really the Upanishad's metaphor for the higher and lower self within Man. Each represents a certain stage of advancement along the path up the ladder of man's evolution. The "asura" represents the lower rungs; and the 'dEvas' are the higher reaches of the evolutionary spiral. ************** The 'manushya' with no 'dayA' in his heart is an 'asurA' worse than Hiranyakasipu; and the 'manushya' who has mastered the senses, that Man of 'dama, is verily a 'dEva' greater than 'agni'. To Man's eternal question of Life, "To be or not to be?", the BrahadAranyaka Upanishad thus gives a direct but profound answer: "If you must 'be' then be with Compassion. If you must 'not be', then be not without Self-control". This is the principal message of the story. This is the call of the ancient 'sruti'. This is the wisdom of the Upanishad. It is also the eternal song of the Voice from the clouds: the Thunder which keeps saying to us: "da, da, da". --------------- (CONCLUDED) Regards, dAsan, Sudarshan ______________________ Send free SMS using the Messenger. Go to http://in.mobile./new/pc/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.