Deemed 4-

[Guest guest]

nAdudai mannar

deemed possession and ownership

 

Lord krishNA went as an emissary of pANdavA-s who did not have any

kingdom at that time. In fact, His mission was to recover the

kingdom.

 

In thiru-voi-mozhi nam-AzhwAr mentions Lord krishNA as an emissary of

king who had the kingdom. How is it that?

 

As per Lord krshNA's esteemed opinion, the kingdom was theirs and

hence, they were deemed as having the kingdom already.

 

the pAsuram runs as follows:

",..nAdudai mannarkku, dhUthu sel nambikku" 6-6-5;

 

EDu vyAkyAnam is excellent in this regard. Questioning the validity of

mentioning that they possess the kingdom -when in fact the whole

mission if for that purpose-when in fact dven a drop of land was

refused to them- it is mentioned that :

 

" bhagavath abiprAyathAlEa avanai nAdudai mannar engiRAr kANum"

 

 

The Lord deems pANdavAs as the possession of kingdom and that comes out as AzhwAr-s pAsuram.

 

The opinion of the Lord thus makes what is not as a deemed possession and ownership. Is it not?

vanamamalai padmanabhan