Guest guest Posted July 31, 2004 Report Share Posted July 31, 2004 SRIMATHE RAMANUJAYA NAMAHA. Dhyaanam. “’karkum kalvikku ellai elanE ennum karkum kalvi yaavEnum yaanE ennum karkum kalvi seivEnum yaanE ennum karkum kalvi theerpEnE yaanum ennum karkum kalvi shaaramum yaanE ennum karkum kalvi naathan vanthErakkollO karkum kalvi-yeerku ivai en sollugEn karkum kalvi en magaL kaNgindravE’ (Thiruvaimozhi) Dear all, I bow with reverence to the clarity of purpose, the genuineness in search for knowledge and the unshakable faith in our Sanatana Dharma as an embodiment knowledge of the Highest order- the real glow of which is mired in dust due to our ignorance cultivated over generations- that is found in Sri Gopinathan’s mail. The following observation made by him in his mail gives me the courage to speak up that which I normally won’t when not asked for, due to the conviction which I understood by experience that we should not speak unless asked to. Still I wish to continue because of the belief that there will be someone at some place and during some time, now or in future who comes across this would stand to refine it, improve it and use it for some useful or noble cause. (Sri Giopinath said:-There are a lot of hidden treasures in Hinduism that have been lost in course of time. If we desire, we can bring back the glory. Hinduism is not just a pack of superstitions. Its customs and beliefs have deep meanings that are usually veiled and invisible to the normal eyes, unravelling only those who delve deep into it.) Let me frame in concise form the doubts, questions and accusations that arose as a result of the research information on moolavar published in Indian Express and analyse them for the merits and demerits. Q 1- SHOULD WE NEED TO DO SUCH RESEARCH? A – One need not if one knows the in and out of what constitutes and what results in temple worship! But when the query is raised why specific materials are chosen to go into the making of moolavar, none of us had the answer. But when we get information from the research done by someone, it is only prudent to look into whether such information holds scrutiny from our point of view that has been handed down to us by tradition. For instance, the information about relevance of granite in the walls and the need to keep the garbha griha wet and cool must make us ask ourselves whether we are right in having ceramic tiles, electric lamps etc in the newly built temples or renovated temples. How many times and in how many places the agama rules are being followed only in breach is everybody’s knowledge. To tell more on this, let me tell you that I have visited the stall mentioned in the newspaper report in the Island grounds in Madras in Jan, 1981 and came to know more about the research and findings. The students and professors who conducted the experiments were not U.S. trained (as that might have given them immunity from questioning their credentials as some devotees did) but are very pious, god fearing and a devoted lot like you and me whose sole interest region in conducting these experiments was to establish the fact (as what Sri Gopinath had said) that ours is a wonderful tradition rich in essence in every possible way. In the course of the research that they landed up with some unique information on certain practices that we must certainly look into is what they tried to impress. There was nothing in our tradition that was not done without a purpose or relevance. These practices are of course found in our agamas, but have been given a go-by or diluted in course of time. One finding is that the garbha griha must be always kept cool and moist. The practice of karpoora haarathi was non-existent in olden days and only one or two thoonga vilakku were lit inside the garbha griha. In the name of not violating this rule, we find in many temples powerful electric lamps set just outside the garbha griha but focusing the light on Murthy. Is this practice right, asked these students. Next one is about alankaaram. The effects were profoundly different when the moolavar is adorned with pushpa alankaram, sandana kaappu and the like. We must admit that we need a research like this to remind us how we have to be stickler of rules with reference to alankaaram too. The next one and the most important one which was not mentioned in the newspaper report is that there exists a connection in the form of some circuit between moolavar and the bali peetam or the moolavar and nandhi (in saivite temples). Parallel movement along this did not alter the flow whereas continuous interception across anywhere in the detected circuit resulted in hampering / reducing the flow. We must remind ourselves that traditionally the practice has been that we enter the garbha griham one way and leave through the side door which is found in many of the ancient temples or come out through the same way. Today these doors have been permanently closed in many temples and we freely allow the movement of pilgrims to cross the circuit near the sannidhi in the name of regulating the crowd. The movement and the number of persons to be present at any time must have been stipulated in the agamas. Lack of knowledge about the agamas or lack of interest to know them, or the lack of willingness to follow them are the grey areas which we must look into and not showing an accusative finger at science which in effect is adding to our knowledge. Two years ago we came across another experiment by college students in Tamil nadu which showed an unique property of silver which was not told by western scientists mainly because they have not known the uses that silver vessels are put into in a traditional society like ours. The students filled water drawn from the same source in vessels of different metals, one such being silver and kept under identical conditions as applicable to experiments of this kind. They found growth of micro organisms in all vessels except the one made of silver. Infact the level of micro organisms drastically reduced in the water stored in silver vessel. The level became almost nil on the 10th day in another experiment when micro organisms were added to the water in all vessels to observe their growth. Needless to remind the readers of the important place for silver pancha paatram, ramanujam and kinni in our homes for austere occasions etc. Silver is considered dosham –free and the above mentioned property tells us at least one type of the dhosham –free quality of silver. Further research is going on to establish that property of silver responsible for the dhosham –free nature. Q-2- HOW CAN SCIENCE EXPALIN THE SUPREME LORD WHO IS BEYOND COMPREHENSION AND WHO CAN BE REALISED THROUGH BHAKTI? No one claims so. But science, like other branches of knowledge such as philosophy, meta physics etc is also capable explaining certain phenomena is something that can not be brushed aside. The mail that sparked off the controversy spoke about possibility to see religion (Brahman) in science and not through science. It is like you realise the presence of God in all “kaaNgindra poruL”. It spoke about how we are getting reminded of God in many shades of science, how the many things happening inside us and around us are in harmony with what Hinduism tells us. It happened with most astronauts who went to space. Collins in one of memoirs spoke about how he felt the indescribable presence of God while he was in space. This kind of vigyana-tattwa relationship needs to be understood as one way of knowledge leading to brahma gyana. The Taiittriya passage (II chapter) on Vigyana mayan accepts this. When it is said “Vigyana performs sacrifice” and “vigyana performs karma” it is considered as both knowledge about the sacrifice and also the agent of sacrifice (that which consists of understanding) who is described as vigyana mayan. Bhaashyakaara in his explanation of the 13th Vedantha sutra establishes that it (vigyana) is in the nature of the soul by virtue of it in being the ‘intelligent thing’ (He, i.e, the Supreme person became the intelligent and the non-intelligent thing, (Taiit)). This passage “separately points out the intelligent thing (or the individual self) and the non-intelligent thing (or Matter) by means of their characteristic peculiarities of having a home and of being homeless (respectively); and accordingly this passage indicates by means of the word vigyana (i.e., knowledge or understanding) the intelligent being who possess that vigyana as his characteristic quality”. He goes on to say that this Intelligent being which is different from the earlier levels such as annan mayan, praana mayan and purusha mayan is indeed the Soul created as the manifestation of Brahman in Intelligent form (vigyana mayan) possessing Intelligence which (as vigyana) does the sacrifices and karma. The implication in this and the following passages in Sribhashya is that Anandamayan is Brahman which is different from Vigyana mayan “though It had entered this individual self as Myself”(Chand). Let me stop at this and bring it back to our discussion on hand, for, the continuing passages in SB (are not related to our question as they) go on to establish the equality of Soul with Brahman except in possessing the prerogative to initiate Creation. Coming to our discussion, it is established in Taittriya passages that the Soul is capable of possessing knowledge (by virtue of Brahman having entered it as an Intelligent Being) and using it for realisation of the Brahman but it is found wanting in achieving its goal (of describing Brahman) because ‘yatho vaacho nivarthanthe’. (Without being able to attain Him, speech returns with the mind). The following is what I request the readers to ponder over. In the above verse from Taittriya upanishad, one inference can be made. When does a thing, sent to reach another thing, return? When it strikes it but unable to go further, it is returned back to its source. This is the principle of echo. If it be said that speech and mind are returned without attaining Him, does it imply that the Intelligent soul, the Vigyana mayan though capable of knowing him till his boundary level (if something like that exists) but can not go further because if it goes further that amounts to Liberation from where it would not return to tell us what had happened. (kandavar vindilar, vindavar kandilar). But until that threshold level the Soul’s speech and mind keep doing the shuttle and re-shuttle trips. If this logic is accepted plausible, then we say that the Soul’s urge to employ whatever means of Knowledge that it has at its disposal is justified because it is only too natural for that Soul and it is almost possible to go almost near the Supreme. It is like this. We can understand the meaning of every word of Sage Bhrigu’s version of his search for Brahman in the 3rd chapter in Taittriya upanishad. We can also recite his words with full knowledge of the meanings but only until he says ‘ha vu, ha , vu, ha, vu’. What he experienced when he screamed in Bliss these words can not be understood by us nor can it be measured by any instrument. But until he reached that level we were able to follow his mind. This is similar to establish scientifically what kind of satisfaction that a mother experiences when she rushes to the crying baby, lifts it and feeds it. One need not kill the mother or the baby (as some one believed in doing so with experiments with music and its effect) to know what they actually experience. We do have instruments to measure every type of activity in their brain at that moment of experience but no instrument to measure the real satisfaction that is something special to them. By this it is being stated that science and other branches of knowledge are capable of going farther than we believe but shorter than the real experience of Brahman. This is due to the upanishadic injunction of the shred of difference between vigyana mayan and ananda mayan whereby it is held that Intelligence can not explain Bliss (ananda). But once again some thinkers have tried to use our existing level of knowledge to explain the status of Liberation as something akin to osmosis ( Dr K.C. Varadhachari in Ramanuja’s Theory of Knowledge) which is also the established Truth in Mumukshuppadi, that ‘Mutthanaar, mukundanar pervades us (Mtthanar mukundanar pugundu mammuL mEvinaar – Thiruchanda viruttham). Thus employing different branches of knowledge to know the Brahman is within the nature of the Soul and it does achieve it till the time “the speech and mind return from the Supreme” Some more on science in our tradition;- The researchers on moolavar also found that Vaikuntha Ekadasi is the day when the earth is farthest away from the centre of our galaxy. That is the day the farthest sanchara in dhakshinayana is concluded and the turn towards north begins which actually gets completed on shankaranthi. (Implication) that is the day when the earth is closer to outer space or in religious parlance shall we say closer to vaikuntham (since our galaxy is still racing away from the point of creation which is the seat of God) they also said that ashtami and navami are the days when the combined impact of Sun and the moon on the earth is minimal since they are at right angles to each other. (implication) varahamihira in Brihad samhita speaks about this minimal effect of the two on the fluids in our body and recommends administration of medicines on these days or surgery on these days. But would any one of us agree to this? It seems Gods themselves have deliberately wanted us to use these days for spiritual progress and were born these days (gokulaashtami & rama navami). Is it probably to make the maximum of these two days when mediation on Him would be yielding excellent results, that elders forbade us to do mundane jobs on these days? *agnihotra has now been proven by German scientists as making Vayu energetic and removing pollution of the air. (the process as documented by experiments exactly testifies the Lord’s words in verses 10,11 & 12 in chapter 3 of B.G. Further corroboration is had from Taitt, and Adhitya Hrudhayam) This was first found out when two families who were doing agni hotra at the time of Bhopal gas leakage survived. The details of this, if needed by any will be disclosed in a separate mail. _____________________concluded---- Quote of the mail:- Sollinaal thodarchi nee Solappadum poruLum nee. Sollinaal sollappadaathu ThOndrugindra jyothi nee. Sollinaal padaikka nee Padaikka vandu thOndrinaar. Sollinaal surunga nin GuNangaL solla vallarE. (thiruchanda viruttham) (The above mail is not intended to hurt anyone’s sentiments as it is by itself a product of one whose faith in Sanatana Dharma is unshakable. the writer is ready to be corrected for discrepencies in concept and presentation.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.