Guest guest Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 Dear sri vaishNava perunthagaiyeer, We saw in the previous post, the krithi paramaathmudu and its meaning. We also saw brahma coming and saying to vaalmeeki rishi that raama is the dharmaathmaa and bhagavaan of this loKam. brahma says 'raama: lOkE bhagavatha:, dheera, dharmaathma dheematha as in slOkam [1-2-32b and 1-2-33a]. Since there can only be one person, who can be attributed such superlatives, that too by brahmaa himself, this person can be none else than that paramaathmaa - sriman naaraayaNan who has come as raama to this world. So thyaagaraaja straight away says as brahmaa's words "hey [addressed to maharshi as maharshE is to be understood], know that he is the paramaathmaa" paramaathmudu veluga muchchata baaga thelusukO rE [paramaathmudu] meaning: please know clearly that he is the paramathama shining in hariyata harudata suralata narulata akhilaaNda kOtulata andharilO [paramaathmudu] meaning: for all the hari, siva, dhevaas, humans and all living beings in this entire galaxy, he is the paramathma shining in (veluga - pallavi)) Hari, Hara, dhevas, human-beings, entire galaxy charaNam: gagana anila thEjO jaala bhoomayamagu mrga khaga naga tharu kOtulalO suguNamulO viguNamulO sathathamu saadhu thyaagarajaa aadhi aashrithulalO [paramaathmudu] meaning: [continued] in sky, air, in fire , in light, in water and in earth, [substance in all 5 boothaas] in animals, birds, mountains (naga), trees and plants, in good and bad characters always in thyaagaraaja and et al who seek him He is shining. Of course, one small argument can be why ST mentions hariyata? raama is the paramaathmaa - is he separate from hari? No, then why hari? Just to make mention that he is the supreme even among the mummoorthys. [Whenever the akaara ukaara makaara the split sabdha artham of the praNava manthram is discussed, then the fourth bhagavaan vaasudhevan is talked about as the combine praNavakaaran, even though the ukaaran is vishNu] Like that hari is included here in the krithi, which is talking about that hari only. Since said by brahma himself, reference to brahma himself is excluded in the lines of krithi. In slOkam what is said as 'dharmaathmaa' is said in the krithi, in as many words as - narula, kOtula, gagana, anila, tarula etc, who is the antharaathma shining in all these - he, that supreme raama. Simply put across by ST. Dear bhathaas now you can vouch whether this is a great krithi or not. That too brahmaa stresses to vaalmeeki 'bhaaga thelusukO' - oh sage, even if you have any doubt, let it be known to you in full - as in raamaayaNam - rahasyam prakaasam cha - known and secrets - told and untold let all be known. So bhaaga thelusuko rE See raamaayaNam slOkam where brahmaa adds on any thing doubtful, rahasyam cha prakaasam cha yadh vruththam thasya dheematha: || 1-2-33 raamasya saha soumithrE raakshasaanaam cha sarvasa: | vaidhEhyaa: cha Eva yadh vruththam prakaasam yadhi vaa raha: || 1-2-34 thath cha api avidhitham sarvam vidhitham thE bhavishyathi | dheematha: = of valorous one saha + soumithrE: = with sumithraa's son [lakshmana] tasya + ramasya = of his, Rama's; [vruththam = stories or adventures] raakshasaanam + cha = of the demons also [vruththam = misadventures] rahasyam + cha + prakaasam + cha = unknown or known or sarvasa: = in every detail yath + vruththam + vaidhEhyaa + cha + Eva = which is the plight of vaidhEhi also even prakaasam + yadhi + va = revealed either or raha: + vaa = unrevealed or yath + vruththam = whatever legend happened thath + cha = that also a + vidhitham + api = un known even sarvam + thE + vidhitham + bhavishyathi = all to you known it will be meaning: The adventures of valorous raama along with lakshmana, and the misadventures of demons, known or unknown in every detail, and even the plight of vaidhEhi which is either revealed or un-revealed so far, and whatever legend that has happened, all that will also be known to you, even if it were to be unknown, as yet. Few points on the name of raga in which this krithi is set: vaagadheeswari = vaak + athi + eeswari vaak - is the speech or words athi - the controlling or lording eeswari- goddess so vaagadheeswari - is saraswathi Brahmaa says the verse of 'maanishaadha' was given to you as per my wish only. We have already seen this slOkam in post 1. "math chhandhaath Eva thE brahman pravruththE ayam sarasvathee | 1-2-31 raamasya charitham kruthsnam kuru thvam rishisaththama |" When saraswathi sitting in the tongue of brahma, her usual or normal seat, we can definitely conclude it is the vaak athi dhEvathaa only has only given that slOkam to vaalmeeki. [is it not a worthy tribute to put that krithi in vaagadheeswari [saraswathi] raagaa. Though thyaagaraajaa has sung a major portion of his work on raamaa, some on krishnaa, also on sivan, vinaayakan et al, he has not sung any specific krithi on saraswathi, the vaak dhEvathai or vaak adhipathi. For a poet to miss a krithi or verse on saraswathi is some thing very special. So as a sort of tribute to her, [or may be as a sort of compromise for his missing a composition], he has kept this krithi in raga vaagadeeswari, and that too at the start of his raamaayaNam or singing raama charitham. That too at the very important place wherein brahma tells vaalmeeki 'please know raama is the paramaathmaa'. Actually thyaagaraajaa has given only one krithi only in this raga. That also adds weight to this raagam as well the krithi. [Two other krithis in raagaas after the name of sarswathi viz: saraswathi [anuraagamulaEni] and saraswathi manOhari [entha vEdu konthu O raaghavaa] are again on raama only, but as such no krithi on saraswathi directly by ST. other music experts can give comments if any krithi is there on sarswathi by ST]. As assort of added information - these two are also 'only one krithi in a particular raaga from thyaagaraaja in these 3 raagams. There are few more 'single krithi in a raagam' by ST. There was a discussion also in sangeetham.com site on such one krithi only in a particular raaga recently]. Now read the krithi once more and enjoy raamaa the paramaathmaa, for any doubt, refer brahmaa's assertion. Dhaasan Vasudevan m.g. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.