Guest guest Posted November 17, 2004 Report Share Posted November 17, 2004 Post 7 Dear sri vaishNava perunthagaiyeer, We saw in post 6 of this bow's story, the bow was broken by sri raama. While sage vaalmeekee says raama lifted that bow so easily - aarOpayath sa dharmaathmaa sa leelam iva thath dhanu: 1-67-16 see kamban - he says 60000 people carried it. Of course vaalmeekee stated 5000 people dragged the 8 wheeled cart carrying the bow in 1-67-4. Whereas kamban says 60000 people carried the bow in dhaNdu - big size round wooden logs - similar what we use in temples to carry the vaahanams during uthsavams. uRuvali yaanaiyai oththa mEniyar seRi mayirk kal enath thiraNda thOLinar aRubadhinaayirar aLavu il aaRRalar thaLi maduththu idaiyidai dhandil thaankinar - 3 kaarmugap padalam baala kaaNdam kamba raamaayaNam. Once the bow was brought to the place where raama janaka and visvaamithra were there, see the description of kamban which vaalmeekee described as 'vathsa raama dhanu: pasya' - ninaindha muni pagarndha elaam neRi unni aRivanum than punaindha sadai mudi thuLakki pOr ERRin mugam paarththaan vanaindhanaiya thirumEni vaLLalum am maathavaththOn ninaindha elaam ninaindhu andha nedunchilaiyai nOkkinaan - 25 - ibid That sage visvaamithra saw raama - realizing the import of that look on him by the sage, raama also saw the big bow. Here two points on the description of raama by kamban are worth a little more elaboration. a. "punaindha sadai mudi thuLakki pOr ERRin mugam paarththaan" - raama is described as 'pOr Eru' - the 'warring bull' used - even at that less than 16 age raama had the unique physique to be described as 'pOr Eru' - just recollect king dhasaratha said 'my son raama is not yet 16' before sending raama along with sage visvaamithra. b. "vanaindhanaiya thirumEni vaLLalum andha nedunchilaiyai nOkkinaan" - this vanaindhanaiya - means picturesque - vanaidhal is to draw - vanaindhanaiya thirumEni - raama's body was like a picture drawn by a skilled artist - this same description is vavailable in other places also - like vaali when he starts addressing raama says 'Oviyaththil ezhudha oNNaa uruvaththOi', in another place as 'Oviya uruva' when vaali calls himself as 'naayEn'. After having a good look at the bow - he neared the bow to lift. At that stage see the reaction of others - a beautiful description by kamban - not found in vaalmeeki. pozhindha nei aagudhi vaai vazhi pongi ezhundha kozhunkanal enna ezhundhaan azhindhahdu vil ena viNNavar aarththaar mozhindhanar aasigaL muppagai venRaar - 26 -ibid Like the fire how it rises, when the ghee spilling from the oblatory spoon reaches it, raama rose. Immediately the dhEvaas made exulting noise, having assembled in the sky. The sages, who have won the enemies within and outside and everywhere, blessed raamaa, for his success. Ok. The dhEvaas in the sky exulted. But what is the reaction of people in the hall? See kamban vaLLal maNaththai magizhndhanan enRaal koL ena munbu koduppadhai allaal veLLam aNaiththavan villai eduththu ip piLLai mun ittadhu pEdhaimai enbaar - 30 ibid. oh, no, it is silly to have placed the bow, in front of this young boy - the bow of one who embraced the floods - ganges - pointing to sivan who received ganges in his matted hairlocks. This slokam "leelayaa sa dhanur madhyE jagraaha vachanaath munE:" || 1-67-15 is given by kamban as aadaga maal varai annadhu thannai thEda arumaamaNi seethai enum pon soodaga vaal vaLai soottida neettum Edu avizh maalai idhu enna eduththaan - 33 ibid Raama lifted the bow [from the box] as though it is a garland for seethaa - to be placed as a maNa maalai - he lifted the bow so lightly and easily - Edu avizh maalai - removed the leaf covering the garland. These three lines of the slokam of vaalmeekee is given as two verses [the above one and below] by kamban - viz. 33, 34. aarOpayath sa dharmaathmaa sa leelam iva thath dhanu: || 1-67-16 aarOpayithvaa mourveem cha poorayaamaasa veeryavaan | thath babhanja dhanur madhyE narasrEshtO mahaayasaa: || 1-67-17 thaduththu imaiyaamal irundhavar thaaLil maduththadhum naaN nudhi vaiththadhum nOkkaar kaduppinil yaarum aRindhilar kaiyaal eduththadhu kaNdanar iRRadhu kEttaar - 34 ibid The people assembled there [including sage visvaamithra, king janaka, king's guru sadhaanandha, other people in the hall et al] did not wink their eyes in surprise [for raama having lifted the bow]. In spite of not winking the eyes, they did not see how quick raama lifted the bow with his hands, how he stringed the naaN in the bow etc, but heard the noise of the bow breaking. Janaka was first surprised when he heard, then, that his daughter seethaa pushed the bow with her left hand so easily. Now he finds raama lifting it so easily - like 'Edu avizh maalai ena eduththaan'. These two show the match between raama and seethaa. [Just recall the matchless matches of sadagopan iyengar swamy earlier]. Also please note the bow is broken in the middle, not at either end, but at handgrip [vaalmeekee]. This shows the power of his handgrip and of his palm. Again this line "eduththadhu kaNdanar iRRadhu kEttaar" is a very popular line often referred and heard in lectures of raamaayaNam. Ok dear bhakthaas- upto this we read the bow's story. But is there any standard or technical specification for the bow? That is given as a comment in valmikiramayan.net site as below. [i mentioned in my earlier post as valimikiramayan.net, which is a mistake, and pardon me for that typo] Specs: a. A bow has a definite height and it is a measure of length, from the ages even up to the age of Kautilya. The bow's height is the height of the archer plus one measure of his head's height, as the upper end has to tower the archer's head. [Monier Williams Sanskrit English dictionary also corroborates this point] b. Kautilya gave many accounts for weights and measures, in his 'Artha Shaastra' [Ref:: Penguin re-publication]. Four aratni-s cubits are one dhanu, a bow-length. One aratni is 18 inches. Thus a bow-length is 6 feet or just above, taking the standard height of an archer as six-foot and or a little above. c. If that being so, this siva's bow's height must be placed more than the human measure of 6 feet, for dhEvaas are supposed to be more gigantic than ordinary human beings. Then it must be something like 8 to 10 feet or more. As per description of raama available elsewhere in raamaayaNam, 'raama is not a crane-legged boy, as his physique is sad to be of 'medium' size. Then how come a boy of, say of 4, 41/2 feet, could catch the upper end of 8-10 feet bow and to bend it...' is the objection raised generally. d. An archer has to stand the bow on ground, clutch its lower end under his big toe, and with one hand, he has to bend it. While with the other hand, he catches the bowstring to string the top end or other end. He is not supposed to handle it horizontally like a holdall or a briefcase. e. To overcome this objection, it is said that the poet vaalmeekee has used the adjective 'mahaathmaa' to raama, 'an unfathomable one with an equally unfathomable soul'. The minute he touched the bow, it became a spongy stick and it listened to him and bent as he wished. f. Other way round also, raama is an ambidextrous archer and visvaamithra had furthered his skill in archery by giving to raamaa's possession, some divine missiles. Hence, his dexterity is now multiplied and he can handle any divine or human bow 'effortlessly'. MGV: Thus, though vaalmeekee and kamban vary in presenting the handling of bow by people who brought it to the hall, how raama handled the bow, the bow's story of siva regarding its creation, how it came to janaka's ancestors, are not varied between them. Now that this siva's bow is broken, that part A of the bow's story. We have to take up the part B - the vishNu bow's story. That we will see in next post. Dhasan Vasudevan m.g. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.