Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Magnanimity -2

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Lord krishNA to vANAsuran/shivA.

 

 

vANAsuran was a demon who had thousand shoulders. His daughter ushai

and anirudhan wanted to be united in wedlock.

 

However, vANAsuram who was a devotee of subramnyA, shivA, opposed this tooth and nail.

The asurA fell at their feet who came to his rescue only to fail after some time.

 

The demon was falling at the feet of anybody who he was seeing. He did

not have any conviction or steadfastness. Having failed in

understanding who the real saviour was, he went on to fight against

the Saviour Himself.

The pAsuram-s go on to explain the fact that shivA and murugan have

helped vANAsuran in furthering his desires but failed in that

process.

 

Lord krishNA spared his life and also removed all his shoulders.

 

The reasons for this is categorically specified in th EDu for the pAsuram

 

"nEAr sarindhAn koDik kOzhik koNDAn-pinnum

nEAr sarindhAn eriyum analOAn,pinnum

nEAr sarindhAn mukkaN mUrthy kaNDEr-appan

nEAR sari vANan thiN thOL thuNithavanREA" thiruvoimzohi 7-4-8;

 

i. ushai pithruhEaniAga voNNAdhu enRu karathai kazhithu viTTAn;

(The Lord spared his life as ushai should not become fatherless)

Further, the deity -shivA requested sriman nArAyaNA that if you kill

him, then nobody would respect me, as I had given him refuge. Hence,

please spare his life, was his request.

 

"ath-thEvathai thAnEa vandhu, nE ivanaik kollil, en kAlil

guNisivArillai ini" enRu paRkATTugaiyAlEa viTTan.

 

ii. 'kara pAdhaiyilEa ivanai kaNDAr kAlil ellAm vizhap paNNiRRu" enRu

avanukkuriya karathai kazhithuvittu iRai ili AkkiviTTan.

 

The shoulders which should have been used for falling at the feet of

Lord Almighty was used for falling at the feet of whoever come in the

way. Therefore, to emphasise the non-advisability of dhEvathAnthra

worhsip the Lord removed all the shoulders.

 

Thus the magnanimity of Sri krshNA is observed on two counts, insparing the life of vANAsuran.

 

1. ushai should not be fatherless and 2. Request of shivA was acceded to.

 

dAsan

vanamamalai padmanabhan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...