Guest guest Posted October 4, 2003 Report Share Posted October 4, 2003 Dear John, It is clear that you disagree with the moderators of the RamanaMaharshi Group. But since the moderators act on behalf of the whole group, we respect their decision. If people overwhelmingly disagreed with the moderation here, they would leave in protest. That is clearly not happening. Surely nothing prevents you from having a private correspondence with Sandeep on spiritual matters and benefitting from his thoughts. Love to all, Harsha > > chueewowee <chueewowee > 2003/10/04 Sat PM 02:23:09 EDT > RamanaMaharshi > Re: [RamanaMaharshi] Re: "Have to"s of the Ramanamaharshi group > > > > 2/10/03 10:57 PM -0400 harsha harsha wrote: > > > Is it not true that Sri Bhagavan Himself followed the rules of the Ashram > > and that when visitors did not act in a way that was considered > > appropriate at Sri Ramanaashram that they were asked to leave? > > I do not see how Sandeep has contravened a rule. Could you demonstrate? For > rules must not be spoke of in passing without demonstrating a breach, or > they are a cause for personal bias. > > Regards, > > John Plum > <fontfamily><param>Verdana</param><flushleft> > > > 2/10/03 10:57 PM -0400 harsha harsha wrote: > > > > Is it not true that Sri Bhagavan Himself followed the rules of the Ashram > > > and that when visitors did not act in a way that was considered > > > appropriate at Sri Ramanaashram that they were asked to leave? > > > I do not see how Sandeep has contravened a rule. Could you demonstrate? For rules must not be spoke of in passing without demonstrating a breach, or they are a cause for personal bias. > > > Regards, "Love itself is the actual form of God." Ramana Maharshi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2003 Report Share Posted October 4, 2003 Thanks Harsha, 4/10/03 3:42 PM -0400 harsha (AT) cox (DOT) net harsha (AT) cox (DOT) net wrote: > If people overwhelmingly disagreed with the moderation here, they would > leave in protest. That is clearly not happening. Perhaps, I do not know because I have not been a long-time member. > > Surely nothing prevents you from having a private correspondence with > Sandeep on spiritual matters and benefitting from his thoughts. Thay is true. ANyhow, I like this group, I must say. I was unsure of Sandeep's thought or position at first, and wondered about it in the context of the group. Then I thought it was a healthy position, along with all the different contributions on a topic, and finding that Sandeep was not at all arrogant in reply to my questions to him. Then perhaps the moderators here know best for the group. I hope Sandeep can find he can contribute too, without any detraction required by anyone. Perhaps he just needs to be a little more thoughtful then in consideration of what has been said to him. I know I often feel my posts are a little arrogant or unsympathetic, but know I do improve by continuing to correspond, with a little more heart in understanding each time. Regards, John Plum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.