Guest guest Posted March 23, 2004 Report Share Posted March 23, 2004 Krishna Bhikshu Translation v.1 In the Chaturmsya1 of 1915 of the era of the Son of God, Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi uttered in a verse the essence of his teaching: v.2: The Eka Sloka In the interior of the heart-cave, Brahman alone shines in the form of the Atman with direct immediacy as I, as I. Enter into the heart with questing mind, or by diving deep within, or through control of breath, and abide in the Atman. v.3: Whoever understands this verse, the essence of Vedanta, uttered by Bhagavan Maharshi, will never again be assailed by doubt. Sri T.V.Kapali Shastriar's Commentary on The Eka Sloka (Chapter Two Verse 2 of the Ramana Gita) FIRST, HERE is the story - Bhagavan's own account as told to Suri Nagamma - of how the Eka Sloka came to be written. " In 1915 Jagadeesa was staying in Skandasram during 'Chaturmasya', and one day he wrote down in a piece of paper 'Hridaya Madhye', held it in his hand and sat down. When I asked him what it was he said he wanted to write a sloka but when he actually began it, only that much he could write. "I asked him to complete the rest. He said that nothing was coming forth and thereafter just left the paper under my seat. Though I reminded him any number of times he pleaded his inability. One day he left for some place. Before his return, I completed the Sloka, wrote below that as 'Jagadeesan' and showed it to him as soon as he returned. Those days he was very young. He said "Is it not Bhagavan who completed it? Why is it written as Jagadeesan?' I said 'I don't know that! was it not Jagadeesan who completed it?' Then, saying 'If it was written by Jagadeesan please give me the paper' he took it away and preserved it with him." Suri Nagamma, to whom this account was given, wanted to have from Bhagavan in an explicit manner what was, as usual with him in such matters, left implicit. She records that she asked him further about this sloka: "Bhagavan himself is Jagadiswara, is it not so?" Bhagavan just replied evasively "That is alright" and proceeded to divert the subject by a narration as to how the Sloka ultimately came to be incorporated in Ramana Gita. Thus Bhagavan had left us in no doubt that the prompting and the product was that of Lord of Universe 'Jagadeesa' Sri Ramana Himself. Another important thing about this sloka is that it is the first composition of Bhagavan in Sanskrit. Earlier his compositions were in Tamil. When Kavya Kantha Ganapati Muni, the great Sanskrit scholar, saw this sloka he was beside himself in joy and proclaimed it as "Ramanopanishad", "Hardopanishad". He decided to write out an exhaustive commentary on it. When in 1916 a reference was made about this in the presence of Bhagavan, Kavya Kantha said "The time for that is yet to come. I shall compose something like Geeta (the bhagavad gita) as a commentary." That was how Ramana Gita itself was born. Here now is the verse itself, followed by Kapali Shastry's remarks taken from his Commentary: on the Forty Verses: "In the interior of the heart cave, Brahman alone shines in the form of the Atman with direct immediacy as I, as I. Enter into the heart with questing mind, or by diving deep within, or by control of breath, and abide in the Atman." "Just as one forgets all other thoughts and keeps aside all other cares, and holding breath and speech gets into the well and plunges deep and plunges deep to find the lost article; even so one has to forget for the moment all his responsibilities and cares and take a deep plunge into the deeper truth of himself, holding calm his breath and mind which would otherwise dissipate his energy and divide his interests. Thus he gets into a movement of plunge that deepening and deepening with a vigilant and discerning eye develops into a supreme awareness. "The methods hitherto suggested (i.e. in the Forty Verses) are all some sort of search with the mind and indeed they yield results of their own: and the earnestness of the search determines the measure of success. But in this verse the method called 'Plunge' is suggested, and this is the real test of earnestness. For an honest whole-hearted attempt involves the gathering up of all one's divided interests and dissipated energy into a concentrated effort of the whole man, of his being in all its entirety. It is not a partial attempt by the mind or by means of controlling the life-breath. "Here restraint of breath and speech are suggested as a means and an accompanying condition of the 'Plunge'. Restraint of speech suggests a mind equipped for the attempt with preliminary calm. Restraint of breath also is spoken of here both as a means and as a necessary condition. It is easy to see that it naturally accompanies a serious attempt of this kind. But how is it a means? The discipline of regulating the breath has a value to life-breath, as it clears away to a certain extent the impurities that are the heritage of a life that is divided in its interest. Besides, the discipline of regulating the breath, Pranayama, gives a certain purity to life in the body and thereby helps the mind to have control over itself by getting clear of the arrogating advances of life upon it. An impure and weak mind is a slave of life which is ever out for the satisfaction of appetite - hunger and thirst - and is full of desire for enjoyment of sensual objects.The Sadhana by which Prana is purified goes a long way to purify and elevate the mind. "It must be noted that what is enjoined here is the adoption of any means, that will enable one to take a determined dive to find the Real in the deep. Though the Maharshi's attitude to Sadhana may be summed up in one word Nishtha - (steadfast abidance) - leading to or realised in Prapatthi - (self-surrender to the Lord, in the knowledge of ones own helplessness), he has no predilection to any of the stereotyped yogas, for instance the Jnanayoga of Nethi (not this, not this) or the Bhaktiyoga with its eight limbs of sravana, kirtana, etc, or the Rajayoga that aims solely at the mind becoming entranced into a state undisturbed by the world. The Vichara or quest is described as a quest for the Self by the calm collected and deepening mind. ...When the mind becomes calm, free from all thoughts other than the single thought of the Self and begins to search for it in silence, then alone real quest for the Self vichara may be said to begin." "As in a well of water deep, dive deep with Reason cleaving sharp. With speech, mind and breath restrained, Exploring thus mayest thou discover The real source of ego-self." (Kapali Shastriar's translation) Note:This sloka is repeated in verse 8 of the Supplement to the 40 Verses and is engraved in gold letters on black basalt above Ramana's couch in the new hall. There is also a Commentary published by Ramanasramam by C.Sudarsanam in Pamphlet Form ===== alan _________ Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger./download/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2004 Report Share Posted March 23, 2004 Natarajan's Ramana Gita Ch 2 `The Three Paths' Vs 1 In the rainy season of 1915., Bhagvan Ramana Rishi stated the essence of his teachings in a verse. Vs 2 In the centre of the Heart-cave, Brahman shines alone. It is the form of Self experienced directly as `I'-`I'. Enter the Heart through self-enquiry or merging or by breath-control and become rooted as That. Commentary There are 300 verses in Ramana Gita. Of these, this verse only was composed by the Maharshi himself. Although the other verses composed by the Muni also set out only the teachings, this verse has a special significance. For, great importance has to be attached to the words of seers as they express their direct vision of the Truth. It is also the first composition of Ramana in Sanskrit. ……In 1915, Jagadiswara Sastri ,an ardent and scholarly devotee, wrote the first few words of this verse, `Hridaya kuhara madhye' , `in the centre of the Heart cave', but could not proceed further however much he tried. After some futile attempts, he went out leaving the paper under Ramana's seat. Before he returned Ramana himself had completed the verse.* [*Letters from Sri Ramanasramam by Suri Nagamma ..pg 341] Ganapati Muni regards this verse as containing the essence of Ramana's teachings. Hence gives it pride of place through an exclusive chapter. Note that `Heart', `Brahman', `Atman' & `Self' are used interchangeably by Ramana. However use of expression `Heart' is most commonly seen. This `Heart' is not the blood circulating organ to the left but the spiritual heart. Based on his own experience, Ramana locates it 2 digits to right of centre of chest…It is at once the seat of the Self& the source of the ego, the individuality. Scriptures declare, `Brahman' shines in hearts of all creation, pure, eternal & self-luminous. Ramana describes how consciousness shines forth by itself, spontaneously, taking form of an un-broken feeling of `I'.—a continuous throb of consciousness, `I'-`I'. The expression Brahman `alone' indicates absence of duality. In Upadesa Saram Ramana explains – true import of indivivuality is the Heart, since it shines always without a let. Whereas, the `I' thought or ego we take to be self, is only a phenomenon of the waking state. The ego perishes , as it were, daily in deep sleep and logically one cannot be that which comes and goes. It must be the Heart which sparkles always because there can be no break in one's being. Though feeling of fullness as `I'-`I' is continuous even when one has notion of separateness, awareness of this feeling would be absent.When through conscious effort the `I' thought is traced to its source and merged there, one becomes conscious of the continuous sparkle of the Heart. In '40 verses on Reality', ramana makes it clear that consciousness of the `I'-`I' is different from the ego or the idea of individuality. Ego is limited, separative and particular. The feeling of `I'-`I' is the limitless expanse of consciouness. The `I' thought, ego, is termed `Aham-Vritti' and the shining of the `I' in the heart is called `Aham-sphurti'. Ramana describes the latter `as an incessant flash of `I' consciousness, you can be aware of it, feel it, hear it, sense it'.* When questioned by Kapali Sastri as to how to feel in this in the body, Ramana explained "that the whole body becomes a mere power, a force current; Life becomes a needle drawn to a huge mass of magnet and as you go deeper and deeper you become a mere centre and then not even that for you become mere consciousness".** [*Sat Darshana Bhasya-P xx, **Ibid –Pxxi] ……….. Ramana's translation of this verse into Tamil and Malayalam, in the `Supplement to Forty verses' needs to be noted. The English translation of this reads as follows.- `In the interior of heart-cavern, Brahman shines alone as `I'-`I', as the Self. Resort to the heart by diving deep within through self-enquiry or by subsiding the mind along with the breath. You will become established in the Heart.'* On plain reading it would appear that two alternatives are suggested, that of merging through self-enquiry or merging through breath control. The alternatives are suggested since the mind and breath have a common source, the Heart. Ramana has explained in Upadesa Saram that they are two branches of the same tree, `Sakti, `Power'.**here again the two paths indicated would be more for practice. The second alternative is more in the nature of an aid to the first, the subsidence of the mind. {*supplement to Forty verses-Vs 8. **Upadesa Saram – Vs 12.} To blow up the controversy whether the paths are three, wo or one is to miss the wood for the trees. It is important to remember that the point which Ramana is emphasising is that direct experience is possible and that one should somehow enter the Heart for which the suggestions mentioned would be complementary in practice. The self-enquiry suggested is not to be pursued weakly but with total interest diving deep like a pearl diver exploring the ocean – bed for pearls.*Or like one trying to recover something which has fallen into water. The mind has to be gathered completely at its root, the `I'-thought. Regarding breath control, it may be mentioned that in the Ramana way the emphasis is not on hata-yogic practices of controlling breath, which involve time and need expert guidance. Instead, the mind is used for watching the breath. On such watching the breath would be regulated. Further, it is to be noted that though it would appear from a literal reading that Ramana gives the same position to breath control as for self-enquiry it is not really so. On a reading of his views on mind-control in this work, and from his replies to the doubts of seekers, it would be clear that Ramana regarded breath regulation only as a temporary aid for self-enquiry itself. For, it would serve as a brake to the ceaseless thought flow which prevents total attention to the `I'- thought Another reason why Ramana does not recommend breath regulation as an independent means is because such regulation often produces temporary stillness of the mind. This would leave the problem of the ego, or thought of separateness, untackled. It is only through conscious effort , through self-enquiry, that the subsidence of the mind at the source takes place. Vs 3 Whoever understands this verse, uttered by Bhagavan Maharshi, containing the essence of Vedanta, will never again be assailed by doubts at any time. Commentary The Muni is in raptures over the preceding verse for, seekers of truth have been given a simple and direct way to Self-abidance. The verse's authoritative nature springs from its being the words of Ramana, one abiding firmly in the state of steady wisdom. Doubts will come to an end for a path has been indicated the treading of which leads to direct experience of truth for oneself. ============ anu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.