Guest guest Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 49-True knowledge and ignorance As the conscious principle known as jnana (true knowledge; realization of one's true nature) is self-existent and self- conscious and is present always and everywhere, ignorance cannot exist anywhere at any time. Although this is the truth, it is the wonderful power of maya (illusion; the power that makes the unreal world appear real) that causes the delusion in which the real ceases to be and the unreal appears. Jnana is not different from that knowledge by which one feels oneself to be "I am ignorant". The sense organ of the eye, which is necessary to know the existence of an inert object, is also necessary for knowing its absence. Although this is the fact, ignorance is widely regarded as being something real. The reason for this is as follows. Although intellect is one only, depending on whether it is used in the proper or improper way, it is known as pure or impure respectively. Similarly, although jnana is one only, when it remains holding onto to reality of Self, it is termed as true knowledge. When it remains clinging to the unreal body it is termed as ignorance. Ignorance denotes only the absence of the knowledge of one's real nature. As the ego is the source of thoughts, destruction of the ego is the means to the destruction of thoughts. So long as there is effort, breath can be retained within. However, as soon as the effort ceases, it becomes outgoing. Similarly, the thoughts that remain contracted so long as there is effort will start expanding as soon as the effort ceases. The sages have therefore concluded that the destruction of the ego is the means for the destruction of the thoughts. Even when asafetida is absent, the container in which it was kept retains its smell. Even when the leaves have been shed, the coconut tree is left with a scar. In the same way, so long as one retains the ego, one has the vasanas (the tendencies of the mind that make one think and behave in repeated, habitual ways) associated with sense objects. This is so even when there is external renunciation and no involvement with the sense objects. Even after the world, which is the effect, has been renounced, the ego, which is the cause, will stick in a very subtle way. The notion "I am a sannyasin (one who has taken the stage in life in which one completely renounces the world and all one's relationships and in which one lives as a mendicant monk)" seen in one who has renounced everything is just a remnant of this ego. The sages have therefore given warnings that an aspirant should always remain vigilant in the natural state. Like the darkness that surrounds one as soon as a lamp is extinguished, the ego will immediately start clinging to the aspirant if there is any slackening. Knowledge and ego are symbolized by Lord Murugan and the demon Sura respectively. So long as attachment to the body is not totally destroyed, complete destruction of bondage is impossible. Elders have consequently classified direct knowledge as firm experience and unsteady experience. NOTE: TAKEN FROM "SRI RAMANA DARSANAM", BY SADHU NATANANANDA, EDITED BY DAVID GODMAN, PAGES 90 AND 91. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.