Guest guest Posted April 17, 2002 Report Share Posted April 17, 2002 Dear friends, Adiyane read a lot of mails in the last few days about the New Year (Tamil and Yugadi). adiyane enjoyed a private one received from a highly respected family-friend (a very high-ranking official in the Government of India, New Delhi, whose name adiyane is not able to divulge) which is being reproduced below for your information and delight too. dAsan, Sudarshan >new year distortions-result of long colonialism- an analysis >Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:34:09 +0000 > >A yugaadi is not a mere 'Telugu New Year's Day' or 'Gudi Padwa' and >another is not a mere 'Tamil New Year's Day' or a 'Baisaki,' as we see characterized >by us the English schooled. And the day after Deepaavali is not the >beginning >of the samvatsara or Gujarati New Year's Day (but it is a reckoning >used by >merchants, and for the beginning of Vikrama era), or Baisaki is not >mere >Punjabi New Year's Day. Such were the 'six blind men and an >elephant' >distortions introduced by the British, who never understood our >calendar or >our traditions, during their colonial rule over India, while we >forgot and >slept (and we still are practically in deep coma); whatever little >the 18th >century European writers grasped, they freely distorted, debased, >and then >taught it to the “heathens” of India, and we the children of those >“heathens” now put down each other using their same cliché >methodically >imbibed in our sacred westernized schools! > >Ultimately history may judge all such distortions and >trivializations as a >great loss in enhancing the spiritual life and real happiness of >almost 70% >of humanity, unless we sincerely learn and properly teach India's >hoary >traditions following the Upanishadic dictum “svaadhyaaya >pravachanaabhyaam na >pramadi tavyam.” > >Moreover, it is astonishing that in our temple calendars and Hindu >religious >activities shaped by Hindus all over USA and the West, we call the >Roman/Christian Gregorian new year's day as 'THE New Year's Day', >Hindu >chaandra yugaadi as 'Telugu New Year's Day' or 'Gudi Padwa', Hindu >saura >yugaadi as 'Tamil New Year's Day' or 'Baisaki' -- just as the >British had >taught us. This reflects our deep-rooted mental slavery to British >colonial >distortions and no familiarity with, and even some hidden contempt >to, our >real history, shastra-s and scriptures. We somehow consider >ourselves experts >on such subjects by reading faulty 18th century European >interpretations and >their carbon copies, almost all of them quite primitive to my humble >grasp, >and pooh-pooh anything natively Hindu! > >Some Other New Year's Days and Mix-ups: > >Truth is: January 1 is the seasonal Gregorian new year's day >tradition about >2,000 years old while the others cited above flow from the >all-encompassing >cosmic new year's day traditions well over 8,000 years old and still >thriving. The former strokes the ego (cf. the wild parties); the >latter helps >us touch our inner divinity. It is the sura-asura tussle within and >without >like day and night, and it is immaterial or in spite of our >religions. Thanks >to our slave educational laurels, I am yet to see even a single >Hindu temple >calendar in the West that prints this truth! > >It is seen in Tamil Nadu that every year on January 1 people visit >temples, >wish “Happy New Year” to each other and offer puja, but on saura >yugaadi >day, the celebrations are mostly home-centered, or even derided as >'brahminical'. During British rule in the then Madras Presidency, >the alien >rulers imposed January 1 New Year's Day celebrations on their >government >employees, who were mostly tradition-bound Hindus, so as to 'teach' >them >Western culture and thus bury the native culture. Our social leaders >saw >through this British game of cultural conquest, and advised the >government employees to use the day to go to temples as a protest! But these >days very >few in Tamil Nadu or anywhere know why some Indians have the habit >of going >to temples on January 1st! It started as a protest against the >imposition of >an alien culture, but now many among us wonder what all these >'confusing' >Yugaadi-s are since January 1 is THE new year's day! We have become >frogs in >a new pond! How much lower can we the English-schooled Indians >reach? We need >to rise ourselves up -- uddharaet aatmanaatmaanam. > >As noted already, the Gregorian calendar is a seasonal calendar -- >January 1 >of the Gregorian new year's day is based on seasons on earth, moving >in >reverse about a degree in 70-71 years with respect to the fixed >nakshatra-s >(due to earth axis precession, ~26,000 years). This renders the >Sun's >position with respect to the nakshatra-s on every January 1 not the >same, and >moon is just not considered. > >Moreover, January 1 was Roman dictator Julius Caesar's birthday, >and, in 45 >BC, he decreed it as the new year's day! No one should object to or >can stop >giving undue prominence to January 1 as THE only new year's day, but >I feel >it reflects how we humans are still slaves to some bygone brutish >ego >disconnected from our real inner divinity. > >Islamic calendars are lunar calendars -- strictly based on the >moon's phases: >New Moon to New Moon is one month, and 12 such months form a year. >Muhammad >decreed so, and hence the tradition. We just celebrated Moharum new >year's >day on March 16 (Hijri era 1423) after the first moon. It appears to >be based >on the Vedic tradition but got disconnected from the full scheme of >time >tracking. > >Chinese and some Jewish calendars use Sun and moon in their >reckonings but >not the nakshatra divisions, and they are often described as >'lunisolar' >calendars. Westerners have used this term 'lunisolar' to describe >the Hindu >calendar (called panchangam) -- this is a misrepresentation. Least >of all, >the two yugaadi-s have little to do with purely lunar and solar >calendars. >Hindu panchangam is not merely 'seasonal', 'lunar' or 'solar' or >mix-ups but >nakshatra based only. Simply, we can say that the Hindu calendar, be >in >Kerala or Kashmir, Gujarat or Manipur, is not seasonal, not solar, >not lunar, >and not lunisolar! Yet it is totally based on natural cycles, and >hence truly >secular, and is astronomically correct -- it is based on the >nakshatra >divisions, since they alone are relatively 'fixed' references in the >sky. >Even our modern astronomers use the fixed stars to figure out >precise time >cycles and celestial events. > >Beauty of our World and Reach of Rishi Wisdom: > >The other day I was checking the planetary positions in a NASA >website. Then >I crosschecked them with a panchangam I have -- matches within a >degree are >amazing. I wonder how those ancient Pandita-s in India knowing not a >cent of >English orNewton's/Keplar's Laws developed such scientific and >analytical >methods without modern science gadgets, supercomputers, and reams of >software! > >The very nakshatra names depict the Cosmic Being's various limbs -- >beauty of >the finest creation and the very beauty of the Veda-s! Similarly, >the month >names in Hindu calendar (chaitra, vaishaakha, etc.) connected to the >respective months' paurNami nakshatra zones say it all -- they are >not tied >to seasons. Hence equations such as 'chaitra and vaishaakha make >vasantha >ritu', etc. are not permanent -- this specific phrase was quite true >some >1,600 years ago but now we are off by about 23 days. And in about >400 years, >the real vasantha ritu will be in the months of phaalguna and >chaitra! This >suggests that possibly this Hindu scientific tradition got frozen >1,600 years >ago -- a time labeled as 'India's golden age' by Westerners! India's >history >does need re-writing from A to Z! > >Thus, yugaadi point (i.e., beginning of a samvatsara) is not tied to >seasons. >Instead, seasons “cycle” through the yugaadi point in 24,000 years >due to >earth axis precession (period of one precession is about 26,000 >years but >earth orbit itself moves due to gravity of the giant planets and >hence net is >24,000 seasonal years -- so say the astronomers, and also yes, a >very ancient >Hindu shastra book long before Lagadha, 1500 BC). Presently vernal >equinox is >close to Yugaadi. In about 10-12,000 years, fall equinox will move >close to >it, and so on. > >There are 60 consecutive samvatsara names - prabhava through kshaya, >the >upcoming being 'chitrabhaanu', 16th in the 60-samvatsara cycle. As >noted >above, varsha is the seasonal year, such as from equinox to the same >equinox >or solstice to the same solstice. From Vedic times, celebrating the >solstice >days (beginnings of uttara and dakshiNa ayana-s) and equinoxes >(vasantha and >sharad vishuvam-s) existed and exists in our society. There is no >evidence >indicating that this was different from other India based >traditions; they >all sprang from Veda samhita mantra-s long before Maxmuller's >assigned time >of 1500-500 BC. > >Seasonal, solar, lunar, lunisolar, stellar -- all these real >considerations >taken together had been India's way of time-keeping and festive >celebrations >from quite ancient times. In India's scheme of social life, Sun, >Moon, earth, >stars, life, and everything around always play their due roles for >reasons >that are plainly secular as well as deeply spiritual. Yugaadi or new >year's >day celebrations thus rekindle this oneness among us and our oneness >with >nature and with It. > >In summary, I have presented a scientific basis for Yugaadi >signaling the >arrival of the secular new year's day as well as spiritual renewal >-- it is >based on worldly and cosmic cycles in our breathing and connected >universe as >declared in the Veda-s. The rest are really not so secular (kind of >pseudo-secular indeed) but are shaped by human decrees and >religions. > >On this New Year's Day called Yugaadi, I wish you all a happy, >healthy, and >prosperous new year. May our inner divinity spring forth from us, >and cement >us all into one whole. ******************************* Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.