Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Doubt on Sri Rama Paduka

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Bhagavatas:

A Bhagavata has raised the following question regarding Bharata’s taking Sri

Rama’s Paduka for installing at Nandigramam. Can any knowledgeable scholar

Offer a suitable answer to the question?

Moderator

===================================================================

 

Sri Rama left for the forest wearing the attire befitting an ascetic. He

does not seem to have taken with him any royal belongings. Of course, he

took his bow and arrows (KodanDam) and a pair of footwear to protect his

feet treading on thorns and hard rock.

 

As the story goes, Sri Rama offered his footwear and Bharata took it to

Nandigrama and installed it on the throne there, himself serving as a

regent. No doubt, this is praiseworthy.

 

But, the question is:

Was he right in depriving Sri Rama of even his footwear leaving him to walk

barefoot in the thorn filled forest and sharp stone-filled terrain?

 

Is there any reference to Sri Rama taking extra pairs of shoes, so that he could

spare one to Bharata or to Bharata taking an alternative pair all the

way from AyOdhya?

 

If not, would this not be a disservice to Sri Rama?

==================================================================

 

 

 

 

 

_______________

The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Bhagavatas,

 

Iwish to answer the doubt on Rama Paduka.

 

Adirohara padabyam paduke hemabhushite I ........ Sodhiruhya

naravyagrah.......... these are the verses in ayodyakanda sarga 112 / 21,21.

 

Bharata asks Rama to step on the golden pairs of paduka . He did so

 

>From the above slokas I think that Rama who left for forests quitting everything

might not have taken a pair of golden paduka which is to be weared by a king. So

bharata might have taken those paduka with him

 

 

 

 

T o support this I wish to quote 2 more slokas from ayodya kanda sarga 79/10,11

 

 

 

Aabishechanikam chaiva Sarvametadupaskrutam IPuraskrutya gamishyami Ramahetor

vanam prati II Tatraiva tam naravyaagram abishichya puraskrutam I .......

 

>From these slokaas it is clear thatBharat wanted to perform pattabisheka for

Rama in forests it self So he wished to take all those meterials with him . So

it is safe to conclude that Bharata took the pairs with him.

 

Further Swami Desika in Padukasahasram states that Rama steped on those pairs

only to get its strenght other wise He could not walk through the Dandakaaranya

which is full of stones (Samarpana paddati-16) By this sloka we can conclude

that Rama went to foirests bear footed. If it is so one could find no fault with

Bharata too.

 

I wish to get the opinions of Baagavatas regarding this reply. I wish to be

corrected if Ianm wrong

 

Kaasyapah

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ram Anbil <Ramanbil wrote:Dear Bhagavatas:

A Bhagavata has raised the following question regarding Bharata’s taking Sri

Rama’s Paduka for installing at Nandigramam. Can any knowledgeable scholar

Offer a suitable answer to the question?

Moderator

===================================================================

 

Sri Rama left for the forest wearing the attire befitting an ascetic. He

does not seem to have taken with him any royal belongings. Of course, he

took his bow and arrows (KodanDam) and a pair of footwear to protect his

feet treading on thorns and hard rock.

 

As the story goes, Sri Rama offered his footwear and Bharata took it to

Nandigrama and installed it on the throne there, himself serving as a

regent. No doubt, this is praiseworthy.

 

But, the question is:

Was he right in depriving Sri Rama of even his footwear leaving him to walk

barefoot in the thorn filled forest and sharp stone-filled terrain?

 

Is there any reference to Sri Rama taking extra pairs of shoes, so that he could

spare one to Bharata or to Bharata taking an alternative pair all the

way from AyOdhya?

 

If not, would this not be a disservice to Sri Rama?

==================================================================

 

 

 

 

 

_______________

The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

 

 

 

 

Srirangasri-

 

 

 

Your use of is subject to

 

 

Catch all the cricket action. Download Score tracker

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...