Guest guest Posted January 26, 2003 Report Share Posted January 26, 2003 SrimatE Raamaanujaaya Namaha // SrimatE Nigamaanta Mahaa Desikaaya Namaha // SrIman! SrI Ranga Sriyam anubadravam anudhinam Samvardhaya/ SrIman! SrI Ranga Sriyam anubadravam anudhinam Samvardhaya// KAvEri VardhathAm kAlE, kAlE varshathu vAsava: / SrI RanganAthO jayathu Sri Ranga Sri cha VardhathAm// =============================================================== SRI RANGA SRI VOL.04 / ISSUE # 11 dated 26th January 2003 SPECIAL ISSUE: REPLIES TO QUESTION BOX QUERIES 1 of 2003 ================================================================ Dear Bhagavatas: You know that a Board of Advisory Consultants (BAC) with all the Yathivaras and almost all Acharyas and Scholars of Bhagavad Ramanuja- Swami Desika Satsampradayam as Poshakars and AlOchakars respectively was formed to help us secure authentic and authoritative clarifications to genuine questions and doubts posed by our members. (Vide Vol 4. 01 for details of members adorning the Board) You also know that for this reason an “Internal Resource Panel” consisting of our own members who have clearly understood our Satsampradayam through PaaTasaala / KaalakshEpa traditions supplemented by Swaadhyaaya was also formed recently. (Vide Vol.4.10 for details of members adorning the Panel) Individual readers raised several questions in the past in personal mails and these were referred to members of the Board and we got answers for most of them. As these will be of interest to the entire readership, we present the excerpts of questions and the replies thereto for your information. If anyone of you feels that his/her question has not been got answered, please email your original question again, by way of reminder. We will get back to you as soon as possible. Members may pose their doubts for clarification to Ramanbil with the subject marked as “To Question Box”. We will try to provide answers immediately, if possible. Wherever, they need reference to authorities, they will be submitted to one of the panel members who we believe would be able to provide answers with appropriate PramaaNams (not mere speculation, please). If at a later stage it is found necessary, we will refer them to one of the members of the Board for an authoritative reply. This might be time consuming and we solicit your patience. But, be assured that the questions will definitely be answered sooner or later. In the unlikely event of a question not being answered say after 15 days, please do remind us with a copy of the original query. Dasoham Anbil Ramaswamy Editor & Publisher “Sri Ranga Sri” ================================================================ IN THIS ISSUE: The Questions answered in this issue are as follows: Qn.1: Can we have in Gruha Aradhana Salagramamas that are broken? Qn.2 on Avataras: Several Questions Sri Rajagoplan Narayan. (1). Can Parasurama and Balarama be considered as avatharas. Avathara means Lord Narayana descends to this earth in some form to destroy evil and protect good. (2). Why the two forms are necessary at the same time-Balarama and Krishna or Rama and Parsurama? Parasurama can be considered as an amsam of the lord. Why did he continue to exist on the prithvi after his intent was completed-he continued during the period of Rama and Balarama at the time of Krishna? (3). Why was it necessary to pick a quarrel with Srirama-one avathara quarreling with another avathara. (4). Only satva guna is present in the Lord even during his Avatharas. This does not seem to be so with Parasurama and Balarama. (5). There are no big temples for either. Why? (6). I remember that only seven avatharas are seen as sculpted works in the front of the Govindaraja sannadi. Perhaps inclusion of Hayagriva and Hamsa may be more apt in the Dasavatharas. Qn.3: Do ‘'achits' also possess 'atmas'? (An offshoot relating to the case of Moksham given to the pot of DadhipaaNdan) Qn. 4: Is it appropriate for a girl to have SamaasrayaNam before marriage? Qn. 5: “I read recently that Lord kRshNa went on kailAsa yAtra, and during that yAtra, composed a hymn on Siva. SrI BhaTTar references this. I would like to know where to find this hymn, and whether it has been commented on by our pUrvAcArya-s”. Qn. 6: It is said that we are never alone, even while in solitude. There are witnesses that stand witness to all our actions. Who are these witnesses? What is the source of the Slokam relating to this? Qn. 7: Can you give any information on Maha Kumbhabhishekam? This is the religious function that is carried out in temples every 12 years. Our temple in this area is planning a big function next year and I am gathering information (significance, procedures, explanations, etc). Qn.8: Regarding link between KapilaraNya and California Can you or any of your friends clarify whether there is any link between the Ramayana episode and the Canyon names? ================================================================== xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ================================================================== Qn.1: Sri Ramakrishna K (Kramakrishna) Can we have in Gruha Aradhana Salagramamas that are broken? Ans: from the Moderator: So long as the Chakrams inside the Saligramams are not impaired, even partly broken Saligramams can be used. Brihat StOtra Ratnaakaram says: KhaNDitaa spuTitaa bhinnaa vahni dagdaa tathiava cha / SalLigrama Silaa yatra tatra dOshO na vidyatE // Na mantrah poojanam naiva na teertham na cha bhaavataa / Stutir Upachaaras cha saLigraama silaarchanE // Meaning: ‘Even if SaaLigraamams are found broken, smashed or burnt by fire, wherever they may be, they are considered without defect. They need no mantram, protocol of Pujaa karmas, AbhishEka teerthams (bathed in holy waters) etc. It is enough if they are propitiated with Stuthi (Prayers) and other upachaaras like Dhoopa, Deepa, naivEdhya etc.” ================================================================== Qn. 2: Sri Rajagoplan Narayan (Rajagopalannarayan) Has raised several queries regarding the Avataras of Parasurama and Balarama. Some of the interesting ones are: 1. Can Parasurama and Balarama be considered as avatharas. Avathara means Lord Narayana descends to this earth in some form to destroy evil and protect good. 2. Why the two forms are necessary at the same time-Balarama and Krishna or Rama and Parsurama? Parasurama can be considered as an amsam of the lord. Why did he continue to exist on the prithvi after his intent was completed-he continued during the period of Rama and Balarama at the time of Krishna? 3.Why was it necessary to pick a quarrel with Srirama-one avathara quarreling with another avathara? 4.Only satva guna is present in the Lord even during his Avatharas. This does not seem to be so with Parasurama and Balarama. 5.There are no big temples for either. Why? 6. I remember that only seven avatharas are seen as sculpted works in the front of the Govindaraja sannadi. Perhaps inclusion of Hayagriva and Hamsa may be more apt in the Dasavatharas. ------------- Reply from Sri Ananta Narasimhachar Swami, Retd. Principal, S.I.T. Trichy: “Email message to Sri Anbil Ramaswamy Respected Swamin Dasasya pranamah - Ubhayakusalam. I am in receipt of your E-mail message and have noted the contents. I seek your kind pardon for the delay in replying. Regarding the incarnations of Parasurama and Balarama, I would like to inform your good self that though they cannot be considered as Purnavatharas, still the Azhwars have accepted them as incarnations of MahaVishnu. In Peria Thirumozhi, Thirumangai azhwar has included the above two avataras in the 8th Tirumozhi of 8th paththu. Sri Swamy Desikan in his Dasavatara stotram has clearly spelt out the above two avataras. (Moderator’s Note: The Lord took Avatara as Parasurama through ‘AvEsa” mode in the form of a “muni” as Swami Desika indicates in his Dasavatara Stotram. As for Balarama Avatara, Swami Desika says he was almost the alter ego of the Lord’s Avatara as Krishna and remained together with him in all his deeds – “kshheeram Sarkara iva”) In the Dasavatara sannidhi in Srirangam, there are idols of Parasurama and Balarama. May be there might not have been a separate temple for Parasurama. (Moderator’s Note: The entire Kerala is known as “Parasurama KshEtram) The recitation of Sri Dasavatara stotram has been stated as warding of evils caused by the planets on an individual. In Puri jagannath temple there is the idol of Balarama also. When the Azhwars and Sri Swamy Desikan have accepted parasurama and balarama as incarnations of Lord Vishnu we have to simply believe it and there cannot be any discussion on the same. Further Parasurama is said to be Chiranjeevi like Vibhishana and Hanuman. So, even though parasurama was born on Kritha Yuga, he has been in Thretha Yuga when he met Lord Sri Rama and Lord Sri Rama humbled him. In Dvapara Yuga again Sri Parasurama taught archery to Sri Bhishma and karna. Even in Kaliyuga Sri Parasurama is believed to be in Mahendra parvatham doing tapas. Sri Swamy Desikan in paramatabhangam says that Sri Parasurama and Sage Vyasa who is also Chiranjeevi will propagate the various branches of Vedas which are now not available that is which have now disappeared due to break of guru shishya tradition. As soon as kritha Yuga commences Lord Parasurama and Sage Vyasa will re-propagate the branches of vedas, which were extinct in Kaliyuga. In Sri Dasavatara Stotra and in Sri Dayasatakam, Sri Swamy Desikan fully justifies these two avataras by telling the use or the Avatara proyojanam of these two avataras. Parasurama did not pick up a quarrel with Lord Sri Rama and the episode that took place was to establish the supremacy of Lord Vishnu over other celestial gods and also to establish the poornaavatara of the incarnation of Lord Sri Rama. In the Nalayira Divya prabandham there are ten pasurams regarding Balaramavatara and 22 pasurams regarding Parasuramavatara. In Vishnu sahasranama stotra there is a Nama pertaining to Parasuramavatara. So from all accounts Parasuramavatara and Balaramavatara have been widely accepted as within the Dasavatara. So, there is no room for any doubt in this regard. ==================================================================== 3. From a member: Do ‘'achits' also possess 'atmas'? Answer from Sri Ananta Narasimhachariar Swami, Principal, S.I.T. Trichy ------ Regarding the point whether Lord Sriman Narayana dwells within all the inanimate objects as antaryami, I wish to inform your goodself that all animate and inanimate objects are the bodies of Lord Sriman Narayana. In the antaryami Brahmanam of Brihadaranyaka Upanishad sage Yagnavalkya identifies 21 objects in which the Lord dwells as antaryami and they are his bodies. In Our Visishta adwaitha philosophy there is no substance in the universe that does not have Lord Sriman Narayana as antaryami. The name and form of any object are on account Lord entering in to every object along with jiva. In Taittariya Upanishad clearly says that Lord Sriman Narayana enters into movable and immovable objects as inner soul. It has to be remembered wherever there is jivatma there is paramatma as both are inseparable and always they are together. The presence of both is possible only in inanimate object. Our mortal body is an inanimate object and both jivatma and paramatma dwell in it. Jivatma according to his punya and papa karma is made to assume a Deva sarira, manushya sarira (human body), Tiryak sarira (animal or creature) or sthavara sarira (non sentient object or inanimate body). So, it is clear that jiva is in every object. But the dharmabhutha gnana which is otherwise called knowledge of perception of the jiva in a sthavara sarira is practically zero. In a thiryak sarira the dharma bhutha gnana of the jiva depends on the category of the thiryaks. In ants, mosquitoes, flies it is rather low where as in birds it is little bit higher. In animals including wild animals it is much higher. In human beings the dharma bhutha gnana is superior to that in the above categories and again varies from individual to individual depending upon one's punya and papakarma. For a liberated soul or mukthatma the dharma bhuthagnana becomes infinity which is same as that of nitya suris. S, when it is established that jiva is there in every object along with him there should be paramatma as both of them should always be to-gether. In the second quarter of the second chapter of Brahmasutra, there is an adhikarana called Rachana Anupapatthi adhikarana. In this adhikarana sage vyasa or Badarayana who is the composer of the sutras says that even in Milk there is paramatma who wills and the milk becomes curd. In water, there is paramatma who wills and water becomes ice. In a coconut tree, water poured at the root becomes sweet water in the tender coconut as the paramatma in that tree wills. So it is clear beyond any doubt that Paramatma is there in every thing and controls every activity of both sentient and non-sentient beings. I think I have made the above points clearly and convincingly. Even if there is any further doubt I shall try to clarify to my best possible ability. =========================================================== Qn 4. From a member: Is it appropriate for a girl to have SamaasrayaNam before her marriage? A wife had samasryanam with totally different HH Acharya (still alive) before marriage. A Husband had samasryanam with different HH Acharya (still alive) after marriage. Because of this situation, the wife does not totally believe in husband's HH Acharya and does not show any interest. This leads to many conflicts during daily kainkaryams. Also because of the same situation, wife did not have second samasryanam with husband's HH Acharya. Please throw some light on how one should handle this delicate situation traditionally. ----------------------- Answer: As per discussions with Acharyas in India: Sastras do not recommend an Acharya doing Pancha samskaram to a spinster. In the UNLIKELY event of an Acharya doing this, the girl on her marriage may or may not have it re-done by the Acharya of the husband. In any case, the Acharya for her husband will automatically be her Acharya may be, in addition to the one who performed her Pancha Samskaram. This will be the best solution for the predicament arising out of this UNLIKELY event. Pancha Samskaram relates to the acceptance of a person in the Srivaishnava community and this is related to the Sareera in this life and has to be done only after her Vivaham. Also, while the very first Samskaram for a boy is his Upanayanam, for a girl it is her Vivaham that is the very first Samskaram. Hence, Pancha Samskaram has to be done only after her marriage. The question of BharaNyasam is different because it relates to the Atma, which is not gender-related and therefore can be done to anyone and at whatever stage, BUT ONLY ONCE. ===================================================================== Qn.5. From a member: “I read recently that Lord kRshNa went on kailAsa yAtra, and during that yAtra, composed a hymn on Siva. SrI BhaTTar references this. I would like to know where to find this hymn, and whether it has been commented on by our pUrvAcArya-s”. Answer ascertained from Sri Purisai Swami: This story may be from one of the Rajasa or Tamasa PuraNas, which are not considered authoritative by SrivaishNavas. This is akin to the canard that Rama performed Linga Puja at Ramanathapuram, which does not find a place either in Valmiki Ramayanam or in Kamba RamayaNam but found improvised in Rama Charita Manas of Tulasidas. ====================================================================== Qn. 6: From a member: It is said that we are never alone, even while in solitude. There are witnesses that stand witness to all our actions. Who are these witnesses? What is the source of the Slokam relating to this? ------------------------------ Answer: They are Sun god, the Moon god, the Wind god, the Fire god, Heaven, Mother Goddess earth, the God presiding over waters, one’s own heart (conscience), Yama (Lord of death), Day, Night, Dawn, Dusk and the deity of Dharma- these know the actions of a man Aaditya chandra anilO analas cha dhyou bhoomir aapO hrudayam yamas cha Ahas cha raatris cha ubE cha sandhyE dharmas cha jaanaati narasya vrittam Moderator’s Note: This occurs in several places: (e.g.) HitOpadEsa SlOka 110 in Suhrid bEda: Answer from Sri M.K.Srinivasa Iyengar Swami, President, Vedanta Desika Research Centre, Chennai to whom the question was referred: “The 14 witnesses appears in Mahabharata Santiparva chapter 79, sloka 30. Also twice in the Panchatantra Mitrabheda - katha 4, sloka 183 again in katha 19, sloka 409” ===================================================================== Qn. 7: from Sri Hemmige: Dear Sriman Anbil Swamy; First of all, I read with interest your publications. Your recent publication on Sri Sudarsana Homam is exceptionally good. I am interested to know if you have any information on Maha Kumbhabhishekam. This is the religious function that is carried out in temples every 12 years. Our temple in this area is planning a big function next year and I am gathering information (significance, procedures, explanations, etc). Thank you very much, Adiyen Dasan, Ranganathan Hemmige ---------------------------- Answer by Sri Narayana Iyengar Swami, (Son of Srirangam koil Jeeyar Swami) who is presently a priest in Shiva Vishnu Temple of Greater Cleveland, Ohio. You will remember that this is this Swami who performed Sudarsana Homam in our home in Cleveland last year with meticulous attention to details. He is an authority in Aagama Sastras and has kindly indicated the procedure as follows: 1. Aachaarya VarNanam 2. Anugjnai 3. PuNyaaha vaachanam 4. Mrith SangrahaNam 5. AnkuraarpaNam 6. Jaalaadi Vaasam 7. Daanyaadi Vaasam 8. Vaastu Homam 9. Beree TaaDaNam 10. Bali pradaanam 11. Bimba Suddhi 12. Sayanaadi Vaasam 13. Nayana unmeelanam 14. Yaaga Saalaa pravEsam 15. Dwaara Pooja 16. Kumba Sthaapanam 17. Agni PratishTai 18. Tattva Homam 19. PoorNa Aaahudi 20. Yaatraa Daanam 21. GaTa uthaanam 22. SamprOkshaNam 23. Tirumanjanam 24. Saatrumurai 25. Prasaada ViniyOgam 26. Aaseervaadam ------ Qn.8: From Sri M.K.Srinivasa Iyengar Swami regarding link between KapilaraNya and California. Can you or any of your friends clarify whether there is any link between the Ramayana episode and the Canyon names? Yours sincerely, M.K.Srinivasan --------------- Answer: We have received several replies to this question. >From Sridhar Vasudevan: Dear Bhaghavathas, Please refer to these sites http://www.kamakoti.org/hindudharma/part2/chap2.htm and http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/dec99/0159.html (Discussed here in 1999) Regards Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan Sridhar Vasudevan >From Srinivasan Sriram: Shri Ram Anbil: Clarence E. Dutton who was working for Major John Wesley Powell had briefly passed through the Yale Divinity school named various points in the Grand Canyon based on Hindu and other religious icons. Authority: An entry on Clarence Dutton may be found in the Encyclopaedia Brittanica besides wide reporting on this subject. An excerpt of the book "Tertiary history of the Grand Canyon District" by Clarence E. Dutton can be found at http://www.uapress.arizona.edu/samples/sam1394.htm An interesting Indian perspective from a traveler - Air Vice Marshall Vishwa Mohan Tewari may be found at http://www.indianest.com/travels/004a.htm And since this topic is about naming patterns it may be noted that Yale University was named after Elihu Yale because of an endowment that he made to the university based on a fortune he amassed as Governor of Madras in 1687. (Authority - http://www.yale.edu/about/history.html, Elihu Yale's bio at http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/Y/Yale-E1li.asp ) Thanks Srinivasan Sriram -------------------- >From Sri Sudarsan Parthasarathy Dear BhAgavathAs, With reference to Sri.M.K.Srinivasa Iyengar Swami's question, AdiyEn can offer an answer. The names of the rocks were names given by geologists in the last 100+ years, and they have no bearing to historical linkages to India. This AdiyEn confirmed when AdiyEn camped in Grand Canyon site several years back, and asked similar questions to the US site expert and geologist. There are several constellations, whereby astronomers have given Sanskrit/VEdic names, based on their passion for Indian history. I wish theories like KapilAranyam is true, but there is no historical evidence / PoorvacharyAs stand / PurAnas to back such a claim. Most Indians passionately associate places they live abroad to Indian likes (like Gandhi Nagar for Halford Ave area in Santa Clara, Simhapuri for Singapore), So, it could be just one of them. The theories around such names evolve and get extrapolated. One can be sure of one fact, to rejoice. Sriman NArayana manifests himself in everything ("IsA vasya...") and significantly in Trivikrama AvatAr he had measured the whole world with his feet, thus blessing everything underneath. AdiyEn Sri RAmAnuja DAsan >From Sri Rajan Raghavan: One of the early explorers of the Grand Canyon was a person interested in Hinduism. He named the various peaks based on his opinion as to how he felt their shape represented in his mind. Some of the books at Grand Canyon explain his rationale. Rajan Raghavan - >From Sri M.K. Sudarsan (Kuwait) Dear Anbil svAmin, This subject has been dealt with by the Kanchi AchArya Chandrasekherendra Saraswati in his famous book "deivattin kural". Regards, dAsan, Sudarshan -- >From Sri Krishna Tatachariar: The names ascribed to Vishnu, Brahma, Shiva, Zeus etc., in the Grand canyon were supposedly creations of engineers who scaled the monument. It so happened that they were broad-minded and were aware of other religious traditions. K. Sreekrishna ================================================================ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ================================================================ _______________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.