Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Dear Moderator, I do not disagree with sriman Hari. I also would like to add that many swamies write lengthy messages and most of the times adding no real value to the main message they intend to convey.Longer the message more investment of precious time for the reader bhagavatas too!. I request for a curtailment on the length of a message (ideally one page) so bhagavathas conveniently get the crisp messages in as short time as possible. sajjana padapadma paramanuhu Lakshmi Narasimha dasan "M.S.HARI Madabhushi Sarangarajan Hari" <mshari wrote: Dear Moderator, I find s.ramachandran to have mentioned the following: > of Lord Shiva - who is considered a Nayanmar, the equivalent of an > Alwar.. . Such comparisons are not fit to be told before scholars. I request the moderators to interfere. In the name of stressing SandyA vandanam, let us not entertain things like advaitam, pASupatham that are opposed to VEdAnta-darSanam. I have been going through many postings of this person. He has once reffered to a famous Advaita scholar and stressed SandyA vandanam. In advaita, finally, the karma is also not reality. One may argue that we can take the good points from other darSanams also. I agree. But the source should not be totally misleading finally. Thanks & Regards naidhruva mAdabhUshi S. HARI rAmAnuja dAsan (mshari) Srirangasri- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Sri: Dear Ramachandran, One should understand the importance of Sandhayvandhanam. Sandhayvandhanam is the first and foremost form of worshipping the unparalleled and unsurpassed supreme Sriman Narayana. The word sandhya is denoting Lord Sriman Narayana and not any other dieties. Lord Sriman Narayana is the inner controller (also supporter and owner) of the Universe. It is a mandatory karma has to be performed every day three times as stated by the sastras and by acharyas in the ahnikams. Lord Sriman Narayana has commanded us to do the sandhyavandhanam through the sastras and in Bagawath Geethai. Sri Vaishnavas worship only Lord Sriman Narayana and the names of other dieties in the mantras denotes only Lord Sriman Narayana not the dieties one usually thinks. Swamy Nigamantha Maha Desikan has explained this point clearly in his divine works. By doing Sandhyavandhanam, one gets purified by the blessings of Lord Sriman Narayana who is pleased. If it is not performed, one gets punishment from the Lord Sriman Narayana. It has been told by our acharyas in ahnika grantams that one is eligible to do any vaidhika karmas only after doing sandhyavandhanam. My asmadacharyan HH Srimath Paravakkottai Andavan Srimath Gopala Desika Maha Desikan of Srimath Poundareekapuram Andavan ashramam stress the importance of performing sandhyavandhanam daily to all sishyas. HH used to deliver numerous discourses stressing the importance of sandhyavandhanam. I would like to present few of those delivered by Srimath Andavan. One who is not doing sandhyavandhanam, 1. is always impure. 2. is having daily asoucham (theetu). Not eligible to do any kind of work. Females only have three days in a month. 3. is not eligible to go in front of Lord Sriman Narayana. 4. is not eligible to go to temple and worship the Lord Sriman Narayana. 5. reciting slokams, sahasranamams goes waste. 6. is a karma chandalan 7. is a traitor (dhrogi) Srimath Andavan with compassion advise sishyas who visit ashramam to do sandhayvandhanam. If a person do not know, Swamy gives a book or send him to a learned Sri Vaishanva to learn the same. Swamy also has organized (thru sishyas / abhimanis) several classes on Sandhayvandhanam. Sriamth Andavan has kept a board stressing the importance and corrects sishyas through upadesams. Please visit the site www.munitrayam.org/andavanashram/Images/Poster1Final.jpg dedicated to Srimath Andavan to see the upadesams of HH. Sandhyavandhanam is a topmost practice in Sri Visishtadvaita philosophy and practice also known as Vedanta Darsnam. By stressing sandhyavandhanam, one should not compare with the avaidhika darsanams. Also, the love or devotion that you quoted is baseless. Only by doing these pratices as stated in the sastras, love or devotion will come towards the Lord Sriman Narayana. Azhwars are also unparalleled and unsurpassed who were always experiencing the Lord Kannan. I fully agree Sri Hari's views in this regard as it is in accordance with the sastras and our acharya's teachings. Regards, ramanuja dasan Vijaykumar T G , M.S.HARI Madabhushi Sarangarajan Hari <mshari@u...> wrote: > Dear Moderator, > > I find s.ramachandran@h... to have mentioned the following: > > > of Lord Shiva - who is considered a Nayanmar, the equivalent of an > > Alwar.. . > > Such comparisons are not fit to be told before scholars. I request the > moderators to interfere. In the name of stressing SandyA vandanam, let us not > entertain things like advaitam, pASupatham that are opposed to > VEdAnta-darSanam. I have been going through many postings of this > person. He has once reffered to a famous Advaita scholar and > stressed SandyA vandanam. In advaita, finally, the karma is also > not reality. One may argue that we can take the good points from > other darSanams also. I agree. But the source should not be > totally misleading finally. > > Thanks & Regards > naidhruva mAdabhUshi S. HARI rAmAnuja dAsan (mshari@u...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.