Guest guest Posted July 27, 2003 Report Share Posted July 27, 2003 At 12:53 AM 7/27/03 -0000, you wrote: > >Hello, > >A message has been sent to the Oppiliappan group from > > krishnaswamy > >The message summary: >-------------------- >FROM: krishnaswamy >DATE: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:15:16 -0700 >SUBJECT: Garbhopanishad > >Dear Devotees, > >Regarding Garbha Upanishad mentioned by Shriman Sagopan: > >Members may like to read the article "Medical Heritage of >India" by N.H. Keshwani on the internet at >http://www.healthlibrary.com/reading/banyan1/1appen1.htm > >The following is an extract from this article: > >-------------------- > >A complete copy of this message has been attached for your convenience. > >This message requires your approval for one of the following reasons: >* Your group is set to moderate all messages from this user, OR >* Your group is set to moderate messages from all users > >To approve or reject this messages using the web, please visit > >Oppiliappan/pending?view=1&msg=3350 > >To approve this message using email, reply to this message. You do not >need to attach the original message, just reply and send. > >To reject this message using email, forward this message to > >Oppiliappan-reject-KCwAboWJlml7dxyG > >Thank you for choosing as your email group >service for the Oppiliappan group. > >Regards, > > Customer Care > >Your use of is subject to > >Return-Path: <krishnaswamy >X-Sender: krishnaswamy >X-Apparently-Oppiliappan >Received: (qmail 49022 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2003 00:53:31 -0000 >Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) > by m19.grp.scd. with QMQP; 27 Jul 2003 00:53:31 -0000 >Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35) > by mta3.grp.scd. with SMTP; 27 Jul 2003 00:53:31 -0000 >Received: from win2knjil0zlsp (c-24-126-222-15.we.client2.attbi.com[24.126.222.15](untrusted sender)) > by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP > id <2003072700133001300ou8aee>; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 00:13:30 +0000 >Message-ID: <005101c353d4$2a015b50$6501a8c0@win2knjil0zlsp> ><Oppiliappan> >Garbhopanishad >Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:15:16 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004E_01C35399.7B77DB20" >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 >"Krishnaswamy" <krishnaswamy >X--Group-Post: member; u=154920610 >X--Profile: m_k_krishna_swamy > >Dear Devotees, > >Regarding Garbha Upanishad mentioned by Shriman Sagopan: > >Members may like to read the article "Medical Heritage of India" by N.H. Keshwani on the internet at http://www.healthlibrary.com/reading/banyan1/1appen1.htm > >The following is an extract from this article: > >"The science of embryology was matter of considerable speculation and controversy in the various schools of philosophy and medicine. One entire Upanished has been devoted to the speculations with regard to the formation and development of the human embryo (Keswani 1962, 1965). This Garbha Upanishad, literally a brief treatise on embryo, is considered to be of greater antiquity than the rest of the Upanishads of the class to which Garbhopanishad belongs. There are ample references to the development of the human embryo in the Vedas themselves. It is suprising to read in them and the various medical texts, the ideas of the ancient Hindus regarding the biological evolution, reproduction, generation, preformation and spontaneous regeneration, which at a first glance appear to be borrowed from a modern text on embryology!" > >Dasan, >Krishnaswamy M.K.<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> ><HTML><HEAD> ><META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> ><META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR> ><STYLE></STYLE> ></HEAD> ><BODY style="COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial" bgColor=#ffffff> ><DIV><FONT size=2> ><DIV><FONT size=2> ><DIV><FONT size=2>Dear Devotees,</FONT></DIV> ><DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV> ><DIV><FONT size=2>Regarding Garbha Upanishad mentioned by Shriman >Sagopan:</FONT></DIV> ><DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV> ><DIV><FONT size=2>Members may like to read the article "Medical Heritage of >India" by N.H. Keshwani on the internet at <A >href="http://www.healthlibrary.com/reading/banyan1/1appen1.htm">http://www. healthlibrary.com/reading/banyan1/1appen1.htm</A></FONT></DIV> ><DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV> ><DIV><FONT size=2>The following is an extract from this article:</FONT></DIV> ><DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV> ><DIV><FONT size=2>"The science of embryology was matter of considerable >speculation and controversy in the various schools of philosophy and medicine. >One entire <I>Upanished</I> has been devoted to the speculations with regard to >the formation and development of the human embryo (Keswani 1962, 1965). This ><I>Garbha Upanishad,</I> literally a brief treatise on embryo, is considered to >be of greater antiquity than the rest of the Upanishads of the class to which ><I>Garbhopanishad</I> belongs. There are ample references to the development of >the human embryo in the <I>Vedas</I> themselves. It is suprising to read in them >and the various medical texts, the ideas of the ancient Hindus regarding the >biological evolution, reproduction, generation, preformation and spontaneous >regeneration, which at a first glance appear to be borrowed from a modern text >on embryology!"<BR></FONT></DIV> ><DIV><FONT size=2>Dasan,</FONT></DIV> ><DIV><FONT size=2>Krishnaswamy >M.K.</DIV></FONT></FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.