Guest guest Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 visishtawdhvaita philosophy is well defined and commented upon so far by sri ramanuja and his contemporary commentators. however i find the terminology interesting like it tries to smother the definition of advaita-ekameva brahmam ithi tawthparyam.ekam sath vipraw bhahoodhaw vadhanthi.-----mawm ekam vidhyadhawmyaham. While analysing the terminology of visishtawdhvaita can be broken as follows: visishta+adhvaita=qUALIFIED MONOISM adhvaitam+visishtam=oneness is unique vi+sishta+adhvaitam=sishta means the creator, vi is the guna. vi+sa+ishta+advaitam=vi refers to god sa +ishta=his desire to be one.I to this view more than contemporary interrpretation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.