Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

veda and nalaiyram

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Respected colleagues,

recently our illustrious colleague sri.satagopan swamy had mentioned in an

article that the nalayiram has been indicated in the srutis.Tgis loks farfetched

..apart fron the antiquity of the vcic age and preceeding the prabandam period,

it is our understanding that the nazhwar pasurams are veda sruthi in tamil which

can be recited by all chathur varnamen and womenobviously the prabandams come

latter.

Further by convention the nalayiram is 4000y inclusion of ramanujaandadi=not an

azhwar pasuram.The no.4000 again depends on how one counts the no. of some of

the pasurams like the madal, thiruverrirukkai etc/

Perhaps the puranas predict the futyue appearance os azhwars and their works,Do

the vedas make such predictions?please excuse my ignorance, adiyen dasan

narayanan

..

 

 

 

 

Discover all that’s new in My

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Sri Narayanan and Sri Varada Rajan :

 

Thanks for your notes . Your points about the

date synchronization problems between the most

ancient VedA (Rg) and more recent Dhivya

Prabhandhams are well understood , anticipated

and respected . Thirumangai was indeed a real local king

who lived in the 9th century. Swamy NammAzhwAr

incarnated few centuries earlier ( some say at the beginning

of Kali Yugam ; His disciple Madhura Kavi was here

and lived towards the end of DhwApara Yugam and the

beginning of Kali Yugam . The dating of AzhwAr's avathAra

time is a tug of war between traditionalists & modern day

researchers like Sri Vyaapuri PiLLai et al. I did not want to

get into those controversies , although I lean towards

all AzhwArs being born between 5th and 9th centuries .

 

The eternal VedAs have a way of looking at some things

and commenting on them elliptically some times . The persistent

reference to " ChathvAri Sahasram " and the mentioning of

Rusmaa in the same manthrams inspired me to intrepret

the way in which I connected the information points.

 

Indeed , the word Chathwari is often found in Vedic parlance.

ChathwAri Sahasram is 4,000 . Among the four manthrams,

we come across reference to " Chathu: Sahasram gavaam "

( Four thousand cows or words of wisdom).

 

The "Go " sabdham in Vedic usage has many meanings :

(1) Cow (2) Divine speech (3) Jwalai (4) BhUmi (5) Victory

(6) Flight (7) JnanakkaNN / wisdom eye / the inner eye /

dhivya chakshus (8) Speeding arrow and (9) Moksham.

 

The path of Moksham described by the MahA Jn~Anis

(AzhwArs who were yet to be born ) thru their 4000 sacred

utterances (NaalAyira dhivya Prabhandham) realized from their

Yoga Balam and Jn~Ana Chakshus for the benefit of

SamsAris falls then in place . The birth of these great path

revealers is what I was commenting upon with a little bit

of poetic license .

 

This fits in with another general prayer housed in Yajur Vedam :

 

" Aaa Brahman BrahmaNO Brahmavarchasee jAyatAmA RaashtrE - - "

Yajur Vedam : XXII.22

 

( O Supreme Lord ! May there be born in this nation , the learned

intellectuals , illustrious for their sacred knowledge ).

 

That is all !

 

V.Sadagopan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

"Rajagopalan Narayan" <rajagopalannarayan

<>

Sunday, November 21, 2004 11:28 AM

veda and nalaiyram

 

 

>

>

> Respected colleagues,

> recently our illustrious colleague sri.satagopan swamy had mentioned in an

> article that the nalayiram has been indicated in the srutis.Tgis loks

> farfetched .apart fron the antiquity of the vcic age and preceeding the

> prabandam period, it is our understanding that the nazhwar pasurams are

> veda sruthi in tamil which can be recited by all chathur varnamen and

> womenobviously the prabandams come latter.

> Further by convention the nalayiram is 4000y inclusion of

> ramanujaandadi=not an azhwar pasuram.The no.4000 again depends on how one

> counts the no. of some of the pasurams like the madal, thiruverrirukkai

> etc/

> Perhaps the puranas predict the futyue appearance os azhwars and their

> works,Do the vedas make such predictions?please excuse my ignorance,

> adiyen dasan narayanan

> .

>

>

>

>

> Discover all that’s new in My

>

>

>

>

Links

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shri Rajagopalan,

 

Firstly: I felt your posting to be very humiliating to our sampradhayam!!

(Also, so many typos, will you not check it before you hit the send button!!)

 

Secondly: In your quest to understanding our sampradhayam,

please do not talk bad about our 4000 Divya Prabhandam, the divine outpourings

from Our Supreme Lord's dear NityaSuris' & Ayudhams' human incarnations.

4000 Divya prabandham is NON-PARIEL. You can not place it behind anything, not

even

Vedam because Prabhandham came out of divine experiences of the great Azhwars

where as Vedam did not have such an origin. More over Dravida Vedam is as old

and

ancient as the Sanskrit Vedam itself. Of course, there are references to these

great

saints - Azhwars even in Bagavatha & Vishnu Puranam.

 

Thirdly: Sri Sadagopan Swami is a very highly learned scholar &

highly respected Baaghavatha with lot knowlegde in Veda, Vedantha, Aruliccheyal

& our mahat sampradhayam, which is evident from his postings in .

Please do not misinterpret such Baagavathaas of such high esteem

and incur Baagavathaapacharam!!

 

Ramanujaacharya is the founder of the Vishishtaadvaita Sampradayam.

It is only fitting that we have Ramanuja Noorandhathi part of 4000 Divya

Prabandham.

 

dasan krishna srinivasan.

 

Rajagopalan Narayan <rajagopalannarayan wrote:

 

 

Respected colleagues,

recently our illustrious colleague sri.satagopan swamy had mentioned in an

article that the nalayiram has been indicated in the srutis.Tgis loks farfetched

..apart fron the antiquity of the vcic age and preceeding the prabandam period,

it is our understanding that the nazhwar pasurams are veda sruthi in tamil which

can be recited by all chathur varnamen and womenobviously the prabandams come

latter.

Further by convention the nalayiram is 4000y inclusion of ramanujaandadi=not an

azhwar pasuram.The no.4000 again depends on how one counts the no. of some of

the pasurams like the madal, thiruverrirukkai etc/

Perhaps the puranas predict the futyue appearance os azhwars and their works,Do

the vedas make such predictions?please excuse my ignorance, adiyen dasan

narayanan

..

 

 

 

 

Discover all that’s new in My

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

__________________Krishna Srinivasan.

 

 

 

The all-new My – Get yours free!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Sri Sadagopan Swami:

 

Thanks for your explanation on the 'go' sabdam.

Could you please share with me what you see from 'rusma' found in

the verse?

 

The reference to 4000 cows is very interesting. If we take

this figuratively, we could refer to many things including

Nalayira Divya prabandam.

 

Yet if we take the vedas more literally, the riks that you cited

are part of substantial numner of riks on Indra and cannot be easily

seen to foresee Alzwar's works.

 

Yet it seems to be a trend, especially in Rig Veda circles perhaps

starting with Sri SayAna, to view Vedas figuratively at a higher

realm thus elevating what seems to be ritualistic or poetic at first

sight. Thus the insight in seeing the Divya Prabandam in Rig Vedam

can be said to be valid. Especially when we see that 4000 cows are

brought from somewhere after a fight or some other victorious event,

we can notice the 'similar' event where the Prabandams were brought

from the 'tAmrabharani river' after they were 'lost'.

 

Looking forward to your forthcoming postings on Ubaya Vedantam,

 

 

dAsan,

RTV Varadarajan

 

 

, Sadagopan <sgopan@c...> wrote:

>

> Dear Sri Narayanan and Sri Varada Rajan :

>

> Thanks for your notes . Your points about the

> date synchronization problems between the most

> ancient VedA (Rg) and more recent Dhivya

> Prabhandhams are well understood , anticipated

> and respected . Thirumangai was indeed a real local king

> who lived in the 9th century. Swamy NammAzhwAr

> incarnated few centuries earlier ( some say at the beginning

> of Kali Yugam ; His disciple Madhura Kavi was here

> and lived towards the end of DhwApara Yugam and the

> beginning of Kali Yugam . The dating of AzhwAr's avathAra

> time is a tug of war between traditionalists & modern day

> researchers like Sri Vyaapuri PiLLai et al. I did not want to

> get into those controversies , although I lean towards

> all AzhwArs being born between 5th and 9th centuries .

>

> The eternal VedAs have a way of looking at some things

> and commenting on them elliptically some times . The persistent

> reference to " ChathvAri Sahasram " and the mentioning of

> Rusmaa in the same manthrams inspired me to intrepret

> the way in which I connected the information points.

>

> Indeed , the word Chathwari is often found in Vedic parlance.

> ChathwAri Sahasram is 4,000 . Among the four manthrams,

> we come across reference to " Chathu: Sahasram gavaam "

> ( Four thousand cows or words of wisdom).

>

> The "Go " sabdham in Vedic usage has many meanings :

> (1) Cow (2) Divine speech (3) Jwalai (4) BhUmi (5) Victory

> (6) Flight (7) JnanakkaNN / wisdom eye / the inner eye /

> dhivya chakshus (8) Speeding arrow and (9) Moksham.

>

> The path of Moksham described by the MahA Jn~Anis

> (AzhwArs who were yet to be born ) thru their 4000 sacred

> utterances (NaalAyira dhivya Prabhandham) realized from their

> Yoga Balam and Jn~Ana Chakshus for the benefit of

> SamsAris falls then in place . The birth of these great path

> revealers is what I was commenting upon with a little bit

> of poetic license .

>

> This fits in with another general prayer housed in Yajur Vedam :

>

> " Aaa Brahman BrahmaNO Brahmavarchasee jAyatAmA RaashtrE - - "

> Yajur Vedam : XXII.22

>

> ( O Supreme Lord ! May there be born in this nation , the learned

> intellectuals , illustrious for their sacred knowledge ).

>

> That is all !

>

> V.Sadagopan

>

-

> "Rajagopalan Narayan" <rajagopalannarayan>

> <>

> Sunday, November 21, 2004 11:28 AM

> veda and nalaiyram

>

>

> >

> >

> > Respected colleagues,

> > recently our illustrious colleague sri.satagopan swamy had

mentioned in an

> > article that the nalayiram has been indicated in the srutis.Tgis

loks

> > farfetched .apart fron the antiquity of the vcic age and

preceeding the

> > prabandam period, it is our understanding that the nazhwar

pasurams are

> > veda sruthi in tamil which can be recited by all chathur

varnamen and

> > womenobviously the prabandams come latter.

> > Further by convention the nalayiram is 4000y inclusion of

> > ramanujaandadi=not an azhwar pasuram.The no.4000 again depends

on how one

> > counts the no. of some of the pasurams like the madal,

thiruverrirukkai

> > etc/

> > Perhaps the puranas predict the futyue appearance os azhwars and

their

> > works,Do the vedas make such predictions?please excuse my

ignorance,

> > adiyen dasan narayanan

> > .

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Discover all that's new in My

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Links

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Sri Narayanan and Sri Varada Rajan :

 

Thanks for your notes . Your points about the

date synchronization problems between the most

ancient VedA (Rg) and more recent Dhivya

Prabhandhams are well understood , anticipated

and respected . Thirumangai was indeed a real local king

who lived in the 9th century. Swamy NammAzhwAr

incarnated few centuries earlier ( some say at the beginning

of Kali Yugam ; His disciple Madhura Kavi was here

and lived towards the end of DhwApara Yugam and the

beginning of Kali Yugam . The dating of AzhwAr's avathAra

time is a tug of war between traditionalists & modern day

researchers like Sri Vyaapuri PiLLai et al. I did not want to

get into those controversies , although I lean towards

all AzhwArs being born between 5th and 9th centuries .

 

The eternal VedAs have a way of looking at some things

and commenting on them elliptically some times . The persistent

reference to " ChathvAri Sahasram " and the mentioning of

Rusmaa in the same manthrams inspired me to intrepret

the way in which I connected the information points.

 

Indeed , the word Chathwari is often found in Vedic parlance.

ChathwAri Sahasram is 4,000 . Among the four manthrams,

we come across reference to " Chathu: Sahasram gavaam "

( Four thousand cows or words of wisdom).

 

The "Go " sabdham in Vedic usage has many meanings :

(1) Cow (2) Divine speech (3) Jwalai (4) BhUmi (5) Victory

(6) Flight (7) JnanakkaNN / wisdom eye / the inner eye /

dhivya chakshus (8) Speeding arrow and (9) Moksham.

 

The path of Moksham described by the MahA Jn~Anis

(AzhwArs who were yet to be born ) thru their 4000 sacred

utterances (NaalAyira dhivya Prabhandham) realized from their

Yoga Balam and Jn~Ana Chakshus for the benefit of

SamsAris falls then in place . The birth of these great path

revealers is what I was commenting upon with a little bit

of poetic license .

 

This fits in with another general prayer housed in Yajur Vedam :

 

" Aaa Brahman BrahmaNO Brahmavarchasee jAyatAmA RaashtrE - - "

Yajur Vedam : XXII.22

 

( O Supreme Lord ! May there be born in this nation , the learned

intellectuals , illustrious for their sacred knowledge ).

 

That is all !

 

V.Sadagopan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...