Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

SRS Vol 6-12 d/03/06/05

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

SrimatE Raamaanujaaya Namaha //

SrimatE Nigamaanta Mahaa Desikaaya Namaha //

SrIman! SrI Ranga Sriyam anupadravam anudhinam Samvardhaya/

SrIman! SrI Ranga Sriyam anupadravam anudhinam Samvardhaya//

KAvEri VardhathAm kAlE, kAlE varshathu vAsava: /

SrI RanganAthO jayathu Sri Ranga Sri cha VardhathAm//

=================================================

SRI RANGA SRI VOL.06 / ISSUE # 12 dated 03/06/05

=================================================

EDITORIAL:

“SRS_SATSANGAM” SITE.

Your kind attention is invited to the Editorial of Vol. 6.11 dated 02/19/05.

As requested therein, all queries and doubts and responses thereto may be

addressed to "SRS_Satsangam" only and NOT to the Journal.

 

The Guidelines for the Journal referred to above will apply mutatis mutandis

to this site as well. A minimal monitoring will be made to keep up the

quality of postings. This means that postings to this site also will require

prior approval by the Moderator.

 

But, as only members can post to this site, those who wish to avail of the

facility should, in the first place, send an email to -

"SRS_Satsangam-".

 

It may be noted that membership is open to all.

 

Moderator

"Sri Ranga Sri Journal" and

"SRS_Satsngam" group

=================================================

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

=================================================

IN THIS ISSUE:

1. DESIKAMRUTAM – SRIMAD RAHASYA TRAYA SARAM

(SRI SADAGOPAN IYENGAR SWAMI

SRIKARYAM SWAMI OF SDDS & SRS (FROM COIMBATORE)

2. “TRIMURTI” - IN NAMMAZHWAR’S TIRUVOIMOZHI- PART 8

(SRI N. KRISHNAMACHARIAR SWAMI OF CHICAGO)

3. FROM MAHBHARATA

“YAKSHA PRASNAM” PRASNAM #

(M.K.RAMASWAMY IYENGAR ReTIRED SENIOR OFFICER, GOVT> OF INDIA)

=================================================

158 Regular issues have been released, so far besides several Special

Issues) –

- 27 Issues of Vol. 1

- 15 Issues of Vol. 2

- 42 Issues of Vol. 3

- 35 Issues of Vol. 4

- 28 Issues of Vol. 5 &

- 11 Issues of Vol. 6

These issues have been archived for public view at -

 

by Sri Diwakar Kannan (diwakark)

You may also view the archives at http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia maintained

by Sri Srinivasan Sriram (ajiva_rts)

We strongly urge you to kindly peruse the "Regular Issues" archived in the

“Files” Section and view the Contents at “srsindex.html” (Not the individual

postings allowed for encouraging "Reader participation"). We are sure that

you will be convinced of the quality of the contents.

 

IF you are satisfied with the quality and contents of “Sri Ranga Sri”-

Tell your friends to join by sending an email to

Srirangasri-

IF NOT: Tell us, as to how we may improve.

Ever at your service

Dasoham

Anbil Ramaswamy,

Editor & Publisher,

“Sri Ranga Sri”

==============================================

1. DESIKAMRUTAM – SRIMAD RAHASYA TRAYA SARAM

(SRI SADAGOPAN IYENGAR SWAMI

SRIKARYAM SWAMI OF SDDS & SRS (FROM COIMBATORE)

-----------------------------

The Three Tenets—11

 

Thus far, we have seen a detailed exposition of the Gadya phrase,

“Svaadheena trividha chetana achetana svaroopa stithi pravritti bhedam”,

outlining as to how the existence, activity and essential nature, of all the

three types of sentient beings and non-sentient objects, are subject to the

will of Emperuman. Swami Desikan takes up next an enthralling description of the

nature and attributes of the Paramatma, whose all-encompassing glory was

revealed, as aforesaid.

 

Because He is Truth, Wisdom, Limitless, Blissful and ever-pure, Isvara’s

essential nature is defined to be Satyam, Gnaanam, Anantam, Aanandam and

Amalam. This is borne out by the Upanishadic text, “Satyam, Gnaanam, Anantam

Brahma”.

 

Azhwars too highlight these attributes of the Lord thus—“Nandaa Vilakke!

Alattharkku ariyaai!”

 

Each word of this line is significant, with “Nandaa” denoting immutable

Truth,

“Vilakke” signifying Wisdom that eliminates darkness and ignorance,

“Alattharkku ariyaai” portraying the infiniteness or Anantatvam of the Lord. Sri

Nammazhwar pays a further tribute with “Unar muzhu nalam”, telling us that

Emperuman is the repository of endless wisdom and bliss.

 

At the fag end of Tiruvaimozi too, Azhwar is unable to refrain from

cataloguing the Lord’s attributes, with

“soozhndu adanil periya sudar gnaana inbameyo!”.

Physically and by attributes, He is the biggest (“periya”) and greatest. He

is the embodiment of glowing wisdom—“Sudar gnaanam”. He is limitless bliss

personified—“inbameyo”.

 

Sri Tiruppanazhwar is so taken up with the unblemished purity of the Lord,

that he recounts it ahead of all other divine virtues and begins his prabandam

with “Amalan, Adi Piraan”. “Amalan engo” says Sri Nammazhwar too, placing

Emperuman’s Blemish-less-ness on a high pedestal.

 

Thus, Satyatvam, Gnaanatvam, Anantatvam, Aanandatvam and Amalatvam

(respectivelyTruth, Wisdom, Infiniteness, Bliss and Purity) are the defining

attributes of the Lord. Other characteristics, (whether they are other

auspicious traits or His enchanting form), are characteristics brought to

light by the aforesaid five defining attributes.

 

Of the subsidiary attributes thus highlighted, six are associated with His

status as the Supreme Being, the exalted Parabrahmam. These are Gnaanam,

Balam (Strength), Ishvaryam (Bountifulness), Veeryam (Valour), Shakti

(indefatigable energy) and Tejas (Splendour).

 

These attributes contribute to the Supremacy of the Lord in various

respects—

* His Wisdom enables Him to know everything—

“Yo vetti yugapat sarvam, pratyakshena sadaa svata:”, as Sri Nathamuni says.

* Balam refers to the unflinching capability, the undying fount of strength,

of bearing the two worlds, the ones below and Sri Vaikunttam above, with His

mere will.

* Ishvaryam indicates His over-lordship of the entire Cosmos and of

Paramapadam.

* His remaining unchanged and immutable, despite blossoming into the

entire world and its beings, at the time of Creation, is referred to as

“Veeryam”.

* Making the impossible happen, like making the day dark or the night

awash with light, is Shakti.

* And it is His Splendour or Tejas, which annihilates opponents, without His

having to lift even His little finger. It is to the destructive potential of

this Tejas that Sita Piratti refers, when She says that She could very well

reduce Ravana to a heap of ashes—“na tvaa kurmi Dasagreeva! Bhasma

bhasmaarha Tejasa”.

 

There might be any number of auspicious attributes the Lord sports, but the

aforesaid six are the principal ones, contributing to His pre-eminence as

the Parabrahmam.

 

What is the use of a Supreme Being, who is inaccessible? He would at best be

a brilliant Sun in the distant sky, whom you can ogle at but not relate to in

any fashion. The glory of the Lord is such, that despite being the Lord of all,

He lowers Himself to our level, to move with us as one amongst us. These

traits--of Souseelyam and the Kindness and overwhelming Love (Vaatsalyam) that

He exhibits towards all beings, disregarding their innumerable

shortcomings--are the ones that make Him accessible to all, irrespective of

caste, creed, colour or social or economic status.

 

All the auspicious qualities enumerated above are at all times associated

with the Lord’s essential nature or Svaroopam. However, we find some scriptural

texts, associating specific traits with specific Vyooha moorthies. If this

be so, can we say that all traits, at all times, are related to the Isvara

Svaroopam? Yes, we can, says Swami Desikan.

 

These texts just mean that the Lord reveals these specific qualities to

those who worship Him in any of these manifestations. It does not negate the

presence of the other traits in Him, inany of His forms.

 

The Upanishads prescribe 32 Brahma Vidyas or paths to

Paradise, in each of which a particular aspect or auspicious attribute of

Emperuman is given prominence and meditated upon. Similarly, in

Paancharaatra texts too, specific traits are ascribed to each form of the Lord,

whether it is Vyooha Vasudeva, Pradyumna, Aniruddha or Sankarshana.

 

We know that the forms of the Lord are five-fold — Param, Vyooham, Vibhavam,

Arccha and Antaryaami. Of these, if we take the Lord at Sri Vaikunttam, (the

Para Vasudeva roopam), He is meditated upon as possessing all the six

principal qualities enumerated above, viz., Gnaanam, Balam, Ishvaryam, Veeryam,

Shakti and Tejas.

 

As far as the Vyooha Moorties are concerned, some mention them as four

(Vyooha Vasudeva, Pradyumna, Aniruddha and Sankarshana), while some say they are

just three (on account of there being no essential difference in characteristics

between the Para Vasudeva and the Vyooha Vasudeva). Sri Koorattazhwan, in Sri

Varadaraja Stavam, tells us that the Lord’s Vyooha forms are indeed three, with

each displaying two traits each, of the total six that adorn the Supreme Being.

 

The respective traits and functions of the Vyooha Moorties are catalogued by

Sri Bhattar, in Sri Rangaraja Stavam—Uttara Shatakam. The Para Vasudeva of Sri

Vaikunttam is credited with all the six principal attributes enumerated

above and is engaged in affording infinite bliss to all emancipated souls.

Sankarshana displays inimitable Strength and Wisdom. His functions are

destruction of the universe at appropriate times and the authorship of Shastras

as guiding lamps for humanity. Pradyumna is endowed with Ishvaryam and Veeryam

and His activities are Creation and ensuring prevalence of Dharma. Shakti and

Tejas are the preserve of Aniruddha, who looks after Protection and Preservation

of all created beings and propagates the eternal truth.

------------------

To Continue

=======================================================================

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

=======================================================================

2. “TRIMURTI”- IN NAMMAZHWAR’S TIRUVOIMOZHI- PART 8

(SRI N. KRISHNAMACHARIAR SWAMI OF CHICAGO)

--------------------

2.2.9: (13)

 

kAkkum iyalvinan kaNNa perumAn

SErkkai Seidu tan undi uLLE

vAitta tiSai-mugan indiran vAnavar

AkkinAn deiva ulagugaLE.

 

This pASuram states that kaNNan pirAn has, as His inherent nature, the

function of protection. Traditionally, it is believed that brahmA is the

creator, vishNu is the Protector, and rudra is the destroyer. In this

pASuram, AzhvAr clarifies that a) bhagavAn is the true Creator, Protector,

and Destroyer all in one, and b) bhagvAn performs the functions of creation

and destruction only as a prelude to protection, or a means to protection of

the jIva-s as His aim, and so He is by nature One Who is dedicated to

protection of the jIva-s in all His acts.

 

AzhvAr points out how bhagavAn is responsible for all three major functions,

namely, protection, destruction and creation. Since it is well accepted

that bhagavAn is responsible for the function of protection, AzhvAr does not

address this specifically. But he deals with the functions of destruction

and creation in this pASuram, and points out that bhagavAn is responsible

for these functions as well, and that He undertakes these other functions

also only for the purpose of the ultimate protection of the jIva-s, and thus

all His functions are directed towards protection, and so He is ‘kAkkum

iyalvinan’.

 

We all know that bhagavAn is credited with the greatest of all samhaAra-s -

the total destruction of everything at the time of pralaya. Thus, it is

clear that He is responsible for samhAram in its ultimate limit. What some

of us have not realized is that this is really protection in truth, because

He protects all the jIva-s in His stomach at the time of pralaya. It is a

prelude to the next cycle of creation that is in the welfare of the jIva-s,

by giving them another opportunity to attain Him by giving them another body

and all the comforts to enjoy in His next cycle of creation.

 

Now, if we look at the day-to-day instances of the ‘death’ of creatures,

again the traditional view is that rudra or Siva is responsible for this

‘destruction’ on a smaller scale than the pralaya. In truth, again it is

bhagavAn who is responsible for this act of ‘destruction’ as well, since He

is the One Who created rudra and then gave Him the power and responsibility

for this function of ‘destruction’. In other words, rudra performs his

function of destruction at this level, because bhagavAn is acting through

rudra by being His antaryAmi. And the ‘death’ that is considered

destruction by some, is really an act of protection by bhagavAn, since He is

causing this ‘destruction’ so that the jIva will discard the old and

worn-out body, and get another body that is new and fresh, and will get yet

another opportunity to perform kainkaryam to Him and attain Him in this new

birth. This level of destruction is also undertaken by Him, only as a means

of the ultimate protection of the jIva.

 

A similar situation is true with respect to creation. BhagavAn is the One

who creates brahmA first from the brahmANDam that emanates from His navel,

and then gives him the power to create all other things, and thus He is the

true Creator through brahmA also. Thus, it is kaNNan who is responsible for

the creation, protection, and destruction, and no one else. In the four

short lines of this pASuram, nammAzhvAr has packed a lot of deep concepts,

which will be discussed in more detail below.

 

kAkkum iyalvinan – It is bhagavAn’s nature to protect the jIva-s. This is

what He considers more important than the functions of samhAram and

creation. These other two functions are done only to facilitate the

protection of the jIva-s, so that ultimately the jIva-s will attain moksham,

and join Him in SrI vaikunTham for ever.

 

kaNNa perumAn – kaNNan who is sarveSvaran. The term ‘perumAn’ is used along

with ‘kaNNan’ to clarify that bhagavAn takes different incarnations such as

kaNNan, but in all these incarnations, He is full of all His Supreme

qualities without any diminution.

 

kAkkum iyalvinan kaNNa perumAn – The Supreme Deity (perumAn) takes

incarnations for the primary purpose of protection, because this is His very

nature (kAkkum iyalvinan). Note Lord kRshNa’s declaration – paritrANAya

sAdhUnAm, vinASAya ca dushkRtAm – For the protection of the good, and the

destruction of the evil. Protection is mentioned first, and destruction

only follows as the next function in importance. Like removing the weeds

so that the intended grains can grow, destruction of the evil is only for

the protection of the good.

 

SErkkai Seidu - “SErttuk koLLudal” - By making everything merge into Him at

the time of pralaya.

 

kAkkum iyalvinan … SErkkai Seidu …. AkkinAn:

 

- The first set of words – kAkkum iyalvinan, refers to the function

of protection, which is His nature.

- Serkkai Seidu – The second set of words refers to the function

of destruction. This is subservient to the function of protection. It is

for the purpose of protecting the jIva-s from being destroyed during the

pralaya, that He saves everything in His stomach at the time of pralaya,

even ensuring that they do not bump into each other and suffer any damage.

- AkkinAn – The third function in this sequence, namely creation,

is dependent on the previous step, that of samhAram, which again was meant

for protection.

 

In order of importance, protection is the most important. By saying “kAkkum

iyalvinan AkkinAn”, AzhvAr emphasizes that the main purpose is protection,

and creation is only a means of protection – giving a body to the jIva-s so

that they can expend their karma-s and attain Him. By saying “SErkkai Seidu

AkkinAn”, AzhvAr clarifies that Serikkai Seidal or destruction is again a

prelude to “Akkal’ or creation.

 

undi uLLE – in His navel.

 

vAitta tiSai mugan, indiran, vAnavar AkkinAn – He created brahmA, indra, and

all the other deva-s, out of the jIva-s that had accumulated enough good

deeds to deserve these positions (vAitta).

 

daiva ulagugaLE AkkinAn - He also created the divine worlds for brahmA,

indra, etc. to live and rule. Note that even the worlds in which the likes

of brahmA and indra live, are all created by bhagavAn, and thus, He is the

Creator of everything, including everything that existed before these

deva-s, and everything after these deva-s, in addition to the deva-s

themselves.

 

All the beings originated in the brahmANDam, which appeared out of the navel

of Lord vishNu. At the time that the brahmANDa gets destroyed, Siva also

gets destroyed, since he is one of the beings in the brahmANDa. It is

bhagavAn SrIman nArAyaNa who starts the function of creation all over, and

He maintains and controls the cycle of creation, protection and destruction.

 

Thus, in this pASuram, AzhvAr declares that all the three functions –

Protection, destruction and creation, are performed by bhagavAn, and He is

the same One who takes Divine incarnations in the forms of kRshNa, rAma,

varAha, matsya, etc.

 

People can rationally ask: “Protection and destruction are opposites of

each other, and conflicting when the same Deity – Lord vishNu, is declared

to be responsible for both. In addition, Lord vishNu is primarily associated

with the function of protection. So how do we explain this pASuram, which

declares that He is the One who is responsible for all the three functions.

AzhvAr clarifies that bhagavAn is “kAkkum iyalvinan”, and the other

functions, those of destruction and creation, are undertaken because they

are aids to the function of protection of the jIva. He protects the jIva-s

at the time of pralaya by merging them with Him in His stomach – which we

call ‘samhAram” or destruction. He protects the jIva when the body the jIva

has becomes old, by giving them a new body – which we call the function of

creation. Neither brahmA nor rudra are concerned about the protection of

the jIva – they just do their assigned functions. Only bhagavAn has the

sole objective of protecting the jIva-s in all His actions.

 

To recaptitulate, among the concepts conveyed in this pASuram are: 1. The

incarnations such as kaNNan, rAman, etc., are all those of emperumAn; He

retains all His kalyANa guNa-s in full in these incarnations; 2. It is

bhagavAn’s inherent and essential Nature to protect the jIva-s, and whatever

He does is for the protection of the jIva-s; 3. He is the One who is

responsible for the functions of creation and destruction in addition to

protection, and the first two are undertaken by Him for the purpose of

protection as the principal goal; 4. He is the One who created the likes of

brahmA, Siva. etc.,and the worlds which they rule over, and thus, He is the

One and Only Supreme Deity.

 

svAmi deSikan captures the gist of this pASuram as “rakshNAya avatIrNam” –

BhagavAn takes incarnations solely for the purpose of protection. The

destruction of rAvaNa, hiraNyakaSipu etc., really result in their attaining

moksham – the ultimate protection, even though we only see them as ‘killing

of rAvaNa or hiraNyakaSipu’.

--------

2.2.10: (14)

 

kaLvA! emmaiyum Ezhulagum nin

uLLE tORRiya iRaiva! enRu

veL ERan nAn-mugan indiran vAnavar

puL Urdi kazhal paNindu EttuvarE.

 

Through this pASuram, nammAzhvAr is appealing to those who still consider

rudra, brahmA etc., as supreme deities, and advising them that they should

at least follow the lead of brahmA, rudra, etc., who themselves worship the

Lotus Feet of the One Who has garuDa as His vehicle, and praise Him as their

Creator.

 

iRaiva!- Our Lord and Master!

 

emmaiyum Ezh ulagum nin uLLE tORRiya – You Who created us and everything

else in all the seven worlds in You.

 

- nin uLLE – Inside You. This signifies that He is the upAdAna

kAraNa, and there was no other Material Cause other than Him.

- tORRiya – He who thus created. This signifies that He is the

nimitta kAraNa also (analogous to the pot maker – see write-up for pASuram

1.5.4).

 

enRu – so declaring

 

veL Eran, nAnmugan, indiran, vAnavar – Siva - who has the while bull as his

vAhana or vehicle, brahmA - the four-faced one, indra the king of all

deva-s, and all the other deva-s

 

puL Urdi kazhal paNindu EttuvarE – They all worship the Lotus Feet of the

One who has garuDa as His vehicle or vAhana (Lord vishNu).

 

kaLva! - We have not so far covered the first word of this pASuram –

“kaLvA!” Rudra, brahmA, and all the deva-s worship Him by calling to Him as

“iRaiva” – The Lord and Master of all. In addition, or even before that,

they call Him “kaLva!”: This term means “One who steals”, or “One Who hides

the facts”, or “One Who pretends to be someone different from what he is”.

In the current context, the reference is to His hiding His svAtantRyam or

absolute independence in His incarnations, and instead, making it appear

that He is dependent on others. When the deva-s point out to rAma that He

is none other the Supreme Deity, He insists that He is just another human,

the son of daSartha (AtmAnam mAnusham manye). In other words, during His

incarnations, on the one hand, He has all the kalyANa guNa-s as the Supreme

deity in full and intact, but He does not reveal them externally, and

instead, behaves consistent with whatever form He has chosen to take in that

incarnation.

 

The simplest examples of this are His kRshNa incarnation and rAma

incarnation. In His kRshNa incarnation, He takes ‘birth’ in a yAdava

family, and gets beaten up by yaSodA, gets tied to a mortar, and cries as if

He is totally helpless. In His rAma incarnation, He gets driven to the

forest because of the actions of a hunch-backed woman. And all along, He

has all the powers of the Supreme Deity, even though He does not reveal it

to most around him. The short-sighted duryodhana tries to make Him fall

into a pit so that He could tie Him up and ‘arrest’ Him.

 

Interestingly, it is not these instances of bhagavAn hiding His parattvam

from the ordinary folks around Him during His incarnations that rudra and

brahmA are referring to here. Instead, they are referring to bhagavAn hiding

His parattvam from themselves, and their falling for it most of the time.

In His incarnations, bhagavAn makes them believe that He is not the Supreme

Deity. They get tricked to the point that they start believing that they

indeed are the supreme deities. When gajendra called out “AdimUlamE!” –

“Hey My Supreme Lord! Come and protect me”, all these deities tried to go

and help, each one thinking that he was the supreme deity that was called to

help. This transient loss of understanding on their part is because, in His

incarnations, bhagavAn goes to rudra, brahmA, indra etc., and stands before

them and asks them for ‘boons’, just as an ordinary human being.

 

An example is the ‘kailAsa yAtra’ undertaken by Lord kRshNa to seek rudra’s

‘blessing for a child for rukmiNi’. He goes in front of Siva, and with

folded hands, stands before Siva and chants “namo ghanTAya karNAya namaH;

kaTa kaTAya ca”, and asks for a boon that ‘rukmiNi be blessed with a child’.

A by-stander brAhmin watches this, and noting that the stotram did not sound

normal or natural, and indeed totally awkward and artificial, remarks that

kRshNa’s tongue is not used to praising anyone else, and so it is throbbing

incoherently like a fish out of water. While His tongue is thus not used to

singing the praise of the other deities, the story with the other deities is

just the opposite, as revealed in tiruma’ngai AzhvAr’s pASuram – nAt

tazhumba nAnmuganum ISanumAi muRaiyAl Etta – The tongues of brahmA and rudra

are developing scars because of their repeated chanting of the praise of

Lord narasimha (periya tirumozhi 1.7.8).

 

When bhagavAn hides His Supremacy thus, and goes and stands in front of

these other deities and prays, sometimes the other deities start thinking

that they indeed are the Supreme deities, and become unaware that they are

His Sesha-s and that He is their Master. Thus, they lose their Seshattvam –

in other words, He has temporarily stolen their positions as His Sesha-s, or

sub-servients to Him, and this is what rudra and brahmA mean by addressing

Him as “kaLvA!”

 

svAmi deSikan captures the rasam in this pASuram through the words ‘rudrAdi

stutya leelam’ – He who has among His leelA-s, the leelA of praising the

likes of rudra as supreme.

-----------------------------

To Continue

===============================================================

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxx

================================================================

3. FROM MAHBHARATA

“YAKSHA PRASNAM” PRASNAM # 121

(M.K.RAMASWAMY IYENGAR, RETD. SENIOR OFFICER OF GOVT. OF INDIA)

=================================================

PRASNAM 121

YAKSHA:

“KAH PANTHAAH?”

“WHICH IS THE TRUE PATH?”

YUDHISHTIRA:

” TARKO APRATISHTAH SRUTAYO VIBHINNAH

NAIKO RISHIH YASYA MATAM PRAMAANAM /

DHARMASYA TATTVAM NIHITAM GUHAAYAAM

MAHAAJANO YENA GATAH SA PANTHAAH”

 

“Logic does not contain the final word and for everything. The vEdic truths

are capable of being interpreted differently. There is no one sage whose

teaching may be said to contain the ultimate substance. Dharma is highly

subtle. In such a bewildering context, there is nothing better than for a

man than to follow the path traversed by noble souls”

 

NOTES:

 

YudhishTira evidently believes that the value of logic has been over rated.

It is not difficult to see why he believes so.

 

Logic, like the surgeon’s scalpel parts the surface and makes probing

easier. Selectively dissecting or vivisecting, it neatly lays bare the inner

core. Thus, through logic, it is possible to reach up to the foundations of

a concept, to know what holds that concept together and also, through

understanding gained, to devalue it here and there.

So, it is said:

Agjnaana jnaana hEtutvaa vachanam saadu manyatE /

anapaahatamEvEdam nEdam saastrama apparthakam //

(Santi Parva Ch. 141.21)

 

Some people hold logic to be valuable because it helps the unknown to be

better known. But, it is all a mistake. The same logic is used to water down

religious texts or hold them as not worthwhile. YudhishTira, therefore,

holds logic to be unreliable indicator of true path.

 

What about the Vedas?

 

They contain the quintessence of knowledge. Yet, the language is cryptic.

The words have an apparent simplicity and a cadence; but, they are mystic.

It is knotted, yet it is virile. The vEDic utterances sometimes seem

contradictory or baffling. As Aurobindo would say “ The secret of the vEda,

even when it has been unveiled remains still a secret!” Such a veiled truth

cannot serve as a signpost.

 

What about the Sages?

 

If we turn to the sages, the situation hardly becomes better. Every vEdic

seer has left profound teachings. It is not easy to see them all strung

together in a growing and evolving harmony similar to the strings or beads

in a musical instrument. At the same time, it is perilous to discard any

teaching as superfluous without the attendant risk of the quest for perfect

knowledge and consciousness tending to get curtailed and severely limited

and, therefore, becoming infirm. Therefore, no single vEdic seer may be said

to have propounded that whole truth to render the teachings of other seers

redundant.

 

If the hope filed face is raised to Dharma, one fares no better. Dharma is

very subtle, lives in the minutest particle and seems cached in a secret

recess. If identifying is difficult, understanding it or interpreting it is

even more difficult.

 

When Draupadi was dragged to the hall where the dice game was being played

as if she was an object or a thing, she summoned her wits and courage and

looked steadily at all the elders in that hall. Then, she pointedly asked

the question whether YudhishTira had offered her as the wager after staking

and losing himself. None replied. There was an embarrassing and a stifling

silence. Then, Bheeshma cleared his throat and told in a small vice and in a

gentle manner:

“Na dharma soukshmyaat subhagE vivEktum saknOmi tE prasnam imam yathaavat”

 

“Oh! Honorable lady! Dharma is subtle. It is not easy to interpret it.

Therefore, I am unable to reply to your question this way or that”

 

If logic has a limitation, vEdas are inscrutable, the sayings of vEdic seers

are complex and Dharma is of magnitude but not easily understood or applied,

what alternative is there except to strengthen one’s faith and tread the

path trodden by the ancestors?

 

Actually, this step commends itself on its own merit as well and is not a

solution emerging through a process of elimination.

 

The path taken by our ancestors, if it was good enough for them that they

chose it would be good enough for us. It will be safe. It will be secure. It

will be familiar too.

 

Further, our ancestors who have caused our existence are like celestials to

us. We shall be invoking protection and securing purification by following

their footsteps.

 

Our ancestors must have led a life of great piety and devotion. There is a

great probability that they continued their earthly existence after

surrendering themselves to the Supreme. Even the dust on their feet has

magical and divine powers.

 

When Sri Rama and Sri Sita were residing in the ChitrakooTa forests, Sri

Rama invited Sita for a holy bath in the river, Mandaakini. He said:

“Vidhoota kalmashaih siddhaih tapOdama samanvitah

Nitya vikshObhita jalam”

(VR II. 95.13)

“Pious souls who have controlled the senses, whose mind is always in poise

and to whom penance is a way of life bathe in this river. The river has

collected the sediment of purifying dust by washing the feet of such

spiritual masters”

 

Sri Rama also said that life in the forest is indeed a blessing in disguise.

“Many of my ancestors had adopted for the way of life in the forest because

it conferred profound blessings for a rich life in this and in the next

world”

idamEva amrutam praahuh raajni raajarishayah pare/

vanavaasam bhavaarthaaya prEtya mE prapitaamahaah //

 

Sri Rama was making it clear that he was not considering himself in exile

and feeling sad and deprived on that count. On the contrary, he was toeing

the line of many of his ancestors who were King-Saints and who had

deliberately retired to lead a life in the forest.

 

Dharmavyaada, the enlightened soul, but butcher by profession, told Kousika,

the Brahmin who sought instructions from him about righteousness- that he

was not ashamed or prone to look down on his profession because it was the

profession of his ancestors too.

“Puraa kritam iti jnaatvaa jeevaami yEtEna karmaNaa”

“I am making a living out of this profession taking comfort from the fact

that this was the profession of my ancestors too”

 

In other words, the true path need not be the one sanctioned by the vEdas or

selected by the vEdic seers or indicated by the Saastras. That which has

been adopted by our noble precursors is without doubt, the true path.

 

------------

To Continue

================================================================

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

================================================================

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...