Guest guest Posted May 10, 2005 Report Share Posted May 10, 2005 Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha Srimathe Vedhantha Desikaya Namaha Srimath VaraVara Munaye Namaha Respected Sri Vaishnava Baghavathas Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan Sampath Kumar. This is my first question in this scholarly forum. In our SriVaishnava Sidhantham it is established that Sriman Narayanan residing in Vaikunta Lokam is parathvam and Krishna is avatharam (Vibhavam) of Sriman Narayanan and Krishna is an expansion of Sriman Narayanan. However, there are other schools of Vaishnavism (especially Gaudia Vaishnavism) which staunchly advocate that Krishna is the parathvam and Narayanan is a subform of Krishna. Even though both these schools accept Sriman Narayanan and Krishna, why this fundamental difference arise and which is correct? Kindly accept adiyen's appologies if my question is inappropriate. Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan Sampath Kumar... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.