Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

raama a brahmachaari

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear sri vaishNava perunthagaiyeer,

 

There is a discussion about 'brahmacharya' in the 'maattup poNNu' series. After

reading that interesting on going series, I wish to add following.

 

There is a slokam in sreemadh vaalmeeki raaamayaNam, when that niranthara

[permanent] and recognised brahmachari hanumaan says to seethaa,

 

'raama: nithyam brahmacharyavrathE sthhitha:'

 

in slokam 12 sargam 32 of sundhara kaaNdam

 

meaning - raama is observing the brahmacharya vratham regularly.

 

As is now quite common with many, in the US and other foreign countries, even

after getting married due to visa problems and others, they are bachelors or

observing brahmacharya vratham in grihasthaasramam, because of the absence of

their wives by their side.

 

Sri raama is not that kind of brahmachari now, because seethaa is away in asOka

vanam, having been kidnapped by raavaNan, and now only hanumaan, with his

Herculean effort, has located seethaa and says to seethaa, raama is now a

bachelor [because of you, his wife, whom he is missing].

 

So raama is NOT a 'circumstance forced bachelor' but, by his aachaaram and

anushtaanams.

 

Hanumaan is a 'sollin selvar' - 'measured talker' and he will not talk wrong.

Then why hanumaan said that? - that too to seethaa, to that very wife of raama,

in front of whom he is standing. This is a point to be understood properly.

 

As per manu dharma saasthram, one who observes restraint from sex on Ekaadhasi,

chathurdhasi, amaavaasya, and pourNami and enjoys on the even thithis during

rest of the days in a month, then he is called brahmachaari. The relevant

portion of manu saasthram is extracted as given below.

 

7.1.10 Grihastha brahmacarya

Let (the husband) approach his wife in due season, being constantly satisfied

with her (alone); he may also, being intent on pleasing her, approach her with a

desire for conjugal union (on any day) excepting the Parvans. [v.3.45.]

 

Sixteen (days and) nights (in each month), including four days, which differ

from the rest and are censured by the virtuous, (are called) the natural season

of women. [v.3.46.]

 

But among these the first four, the eleventh and the thirteenth are (declared to

be) forbidden; the remaining nights are recommended. [v.3.47.]

 

On the even nights sons are conceived and daughters on the uneven ones; hence a

man who desires to have sons should approach his wife in due season on the even

(nights). [v.3.48.]

 

A male child is produced by a greater quantity of male seed, a female child by

the prevalence of the female; if (both are) equal, a hermaphrodite or a boy and

a girl; if (both are) weak or deficient in quantity, a failure of conception

(results). [v.3.49.]

 

He who avoids women on the six forbidden nights and on eight others, is (equal

in chastity to) a student, in whichever order he may live. [v.3.50.]

 

This extract is the book manu dharma saasthram from www.sacredtexts.com

<http://www.sacredtexts.com> web site. [2 ekaadhasis, 2 chathurdhasis, one

amavasya, one pourNami - totalling 6 days]

So raama is a grihasthaasrama brahmachaari, since he observes the rules laid

down here.

 

KrishNa is also a similar grihastha brahmachaari even though he took 16108

roopams to enjoy with his that many wives as per srimadh bhaagavatham.

 

Trust it is quite interesting information.

 

Dhasan

Vasudevan m.g.

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER:

This Message and its contents is intended solely for the addressee and is

proprietary.Information in this mail is for L&T Business Usage only. Any Use to

other than the addressee is misuse and infringement to Proprietorship of L&T

ECC.If you are not the addressee please return the mail to the sender.L&T ECC

DIVISION

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>So raama is NOT a 'circumstance forced bachelor' <<

 

In this context, Raama indeed is forced by events.

His viraha vedana is numerously described in Ramayana.

 

A simple explanation is that Hanuman was dispelling the doubts that naturally

arise in a wife. We know that Sita questioned the intentions of LaxmaNa at one

time

(during maaya mRegham episode). Hanuman being a wise person is

reassuring her of Rama's chastity.

 

While Manu's definition of Bramhacharya is interesting to note, it does not

have much bearing in the present context.

 

dAsan

 

K.S. tAtAchAr

 

 

 

M.G.Vasudevan <mgv

; oppiliappan

Cc: tiruvenkatam; ramanuja

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:46:38 +0530

raama a brahmachaari

 

 

Dear sri vaishNava perunthagaiyeer,

 

There is a discussion about 'brahmacharya' in the 'maattup poNNu' series. After

reading that interesting on going series, I wish to add following.

 

There is a slokam in sreemadh vaalmeeki raaamayaNam, when that niranthara

[permanent] and recognised brahmachari hanumaan says to seethaa,

 

'raama: nithyam brahmacharyavrathE sthhitha:'

 

in slokam 12 sargam 32 of sundhara kaaNdam

 

meaning - raama is observing the brahmacharya vratham regularly.

 

As is now quite common with many, in the US and other foreign countries, even

after getting married due to visa problems and others, they are bachelors or

observing brahmacharya vratham in grihasthaasramam, because of the absence of

their wives by their side.

 

Sri raama is not that kind of brahmachari now, because seethaa is away in asOka

vanam, having been kidnapped by raavaNan, and now only hanumaan, with his

Herculean effort, has located seethaa and says to seethaa, raama is now a

bachelor [because of you, his wife, whom he is missing].

 

So raama is NOT a 'circumstance forced bachelor' but, by his aachaaram and

anushtaanams.

 

Hanumaan is a 'sollin selvar' - 'measured talker' and he will not talk wrong.

Then why hanumaan said that? - that too to seethaa, to that very wife of raama,

in front of whom he is standing. This is a point to be understood properly.

 

As per manu dharma saasthram, one who observes restraint from sex on Ekaadhasi,

chathurdhasi, amaavaasya, and pourNami and enjoys on the even thithis during

rest of the days in a month, then he is called brahmachaari. The relevant

portion of manu saasthram is extracted as given below.

 

7.1.10 Grihastha brahmacarya

Let (the husband) approach his wife in due season, being constantly satisfied

with her (alone); he may also, being intent on pleasing her, approach her with a

desire for conjugal union (on any day) excepting the Parvans. [v.3.45.]

 

Sixteen (days and) nights (in each month), including four days, which differ

from the rest and are censured by the virtuous, (are called) the natural season

of women. [v.3.46.]

 

But among these the first four, the eleventh and the thirteenth are (declared to

be) forbidden; the remaining nights are recommended. [v.3.47.]

 

On the even nights sons are conceived and daughters on the uneven ones; hence a

man who desires to have sons should approach his wife in due season on the even

(nights). [v.3.48.]

 

A male child is produced by a greater quantity of male seed, a female child by

the prevalence of the female; if (both are) equal, a hermaphrodite or a boy and

a girl; if (both are) weak or deficient in quantity, a failure of conception

(results). [v.3.49.]

 

He who avoids women on the six forbidden nights and on eight others, is (equal

in chastity to) a student, in whichever order he may live. [v.3.50.]

 

This extract is the book manu dharma saasthram from www.sacredtexts.com

<http://www.sacredtexts.com> web site. [2 ekaadhasis, 2 chathurdhasis, one

amavasya, one pourNami - totalling 6 days]

So raama is a grihasthaasrama brahmachaari, since he observes the rules laid

down here.

 

KrishNa is also a similar grihastha brahmachaari even though he took 16108

roopams to enjoy with his that many wives as per srimadh bhaagavatham.

 

Trust it is quite interesting information.

 

Dhasan

Vasudevan m.g.

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER:

This Message and its contents is intended solely for the addressee and is

proprietary.Information in this mail is for L&T Business Usage only. Any Use to

other than the addressee is misuse and infringement to Proprietorship of L&T

ECC.If you are not the addressee please return the mail to the sender.L&T ECC

DIVISION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>> As is now quite common with many, in the US and other foreign countries, even

after getting married due to visa problems and others, they are bachelors or

observing brahmacharya vratham in grihasthaasramam, because of the absence of

their wives by their side.<<

 

Like Hanuman, if we run into spouses waiting in India, we should assure them

that their counter parts are behaving (if indeed they are)!

 

 

 

M.G.Vasudevan <mgv

; oppiliappan

Cc: tiruvenkatam; ramanuja

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:46:38 +0530

raama a brahmachaari

 

 

Dear sri vaishNava perunthagaiyeer,

 

There is a discussion about 'brahmacharya' in the 'maattup poNNu' series. After

reading that interesting on going series, I wish to add following.

 

There is a slokam in sreemadh vaalmeeki raaamayaNam, when that niranthara

[permanent] and recognised brahmachari hanumaan says to seethaa,

 

'raama: nithyam brahmacharyavrathE sthhitha:'

 

in slokam 12 sargam 32 of sundhara kaaNdam

 

meaning - raama is observing the brahmacharya vratham regularly.

 

As is now quite common with many, in the US and other foreign countries, even

after getting married due to visa problems and others, they are bachelors or

observing brahmacharya vratham in grihasthaasramam, because of the absence of

their wives by their side.

 

Sri raama is not that kind of brahmachari now, because seethaa is away in asOka

vanam, having been kidnapped by raavaNan, and now only hanumaan, with his

Herculean effort, has located seethaa and says to seethaa, raama is now a

bachelor [because of you, his wife, whom he is missing].

 

So raama is NOT a 'circumstance forced bachelor' but, by his aachaaram and

anushtaanams.

 

Hanumaan is a 'sollin selvar' - 'measured talker' and he will not talk wrong.

Then why hanumaan said that? - that too to seethaa, to that very wife of raama,

in front of whom he is standing. This is a point to be understood properly.

 

As per manu dharma saasthram, one who observes restraint from sex on Ekaadhasi,

chathurdhasi, amaavaasya, and pourNami and enjoys on the even thithis during

rest of the days in a month, then he is called brahmachaari. The relevant

portion of manu saasthram is extracted as given below.

 

7.1.10 Grihastha brahmacarya

Let (the husband) approach his wife in due season, being constantly satisfied

with her (alone); he may also, being intent on pleasing her, approach her with a

desire for conjugal union (on any day) excepting the Parvans. [v.3.45.]

 

Sixteen (days and) nights (in each month), including four days, which differ

from the rest and are censured by the virtuous, (are called) the natural season

of women. [v.3.46.]

 

But among these the first four, the eleventh and the thirteenth are (declared to

be) forbidden; the remaining nights are recommended. [v.3.47.]

 

On the even nights sons are conceived and daughters on the uneven ones; hence a

man who desires to have sons should approach his wife in due season on the even

(nights). [v.3.48.]

 

A male child is produced by a greater quantity of male seed, a female child by

the prevalence of the female; if (both are) equal, a hermaphrodite or a boy and

a girl; if (both are) weak or deficient in quantity, a failure of conception

(results). [v.3.49.]

 

He who avoids women on the six forbidden nights and on eight others, is (equal

in chastity to) a student, in whichever order he may live. [v.3.50.]

 

This extract is the book manu dharma saasthram from www.sacredtexts.com

<http://www.sacredtexts.com> web site. [2 ekaadhasis, 2 chathurdhasis, one

amavasya, one pourNami - totalling 6 days]

So raama is a grihasthaasrama brahmachaari, since he observes the rules laid

down here.

 

KrishNa is also a similar grihastha brahmachaari even though he took 16108

roopams to enjoy with his that many wives as per srimadh bhaagavatham.

 

Trust it is quite interesting information.

 

Dhasan

Vasudevan m.g.

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER:

This Message and its contents is intended solely for the addressee and is

proprietary.Information in this mail is for L&T Business Usage only. Any Use to

other than the addressee is misuse and infringement to Proprietorship of L&T

ECC.If you are not the addressee please return the mail to the sender.L&T ECC

DIVISION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...