universal-spirituality

[Guest guest]

is the below mentioned address is right?

i need help of him

 

A.M. Rajagopalan

2, North Square Street,

Triplicane, Chennai - 600 005

Phone : 855 2127

Lion Dr. K. Parthasarathy

On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 Gayathry wrote :

>Q. 201) Why does your website represent only 6

>religions? Why can you not include some others such as

>Sikhism, Jainism, Judaism, Taoism, Shinto etc? That

>would be more fitting since you call the website

>"Universal Spirituality". ( Amber

>[amber100000000 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com])

>

>

>Ans.) I have considered the main Religions present in

>the world, which are taken as some examples. The

>concept applies to all the other Religions equally.

>Even in the other Religions the same concepts are

>present. I was also mentioning the name of Mahaveer

>Jain in the context of non-violence. I also mentioned

>the philosophy of Jainism when I was talking about the

>truth, which is presented in Jainism as seven-fold. To

>limit the number only I have taken the main Religions.

>This does not mean that we are neglecting other

>Religions.

>Q.202) Why have you superimposed your face on that of

>past incarnations? Will that not shock sincere

>devotees of other incarnations or religions? No other

>incarnation in the past did such a thing. (Swagatam

>Mukhopadhyay [smukhopa (AT) uiuc (DOT) edu])

>Ans.) One of the friends of Shri.Nikhil also asked a

>similar question and I was thinking to answer this.

>The original background was different. When some of My

>devotees were fortunate to have some visions on seeing

>Me, a point was noted by them. In all those visions

>the face was My face only. The devotees who did not

>have such visions were anxious to hear about the

>visions from the other devotees. Based on the

>explanations some devotees decorated My face in

>different forms so that the other devotees may have

>some satisfaction by seeing the visions indirectly.

>Originally these photos were restricted to the circle

>of My devotees only. When the Universal Spirituality

>was started as a Mission, My devotees suggested using

>these photos. I agreed based on one concept, i.e.,

>when the same face is present in all the pictures it

>will give a psychological impression that the same God

>appeared in different forms. The face is the real

>identity of a person. Unfortunately, the pictures of

>various deities and incarnations were only the

>imaginary drawings of artists. But, they included

>different faces in these imaginary diagrams. This will

>give an unconcious impression that the deities and

>incarnations are quite different and the idea of one

>God does not become strong. I have super imposed My

>face on the faces of deities and incarnations for whom

>the real photos were not present. Don’t you think that

>a real face is better than the imaginary face? My face

>and the imaginary faces on the photos are constituted

>by five elements only and there is no difference. I

>did not agree to super impose My face on the face of

>Shri.Shirdi Sai Baba, because His real photo exists.

>For this concept of one God, this single face helps.

>This single real face need not be mine only. In fact

>you can also super impose your face in the faces of

>these deities and incarnations to explain that

>concept. It is only just a pictorial model. I will

>appreciate equally for two merits. 1) The face is real

>and not imaginary and truth is better than false

>imagination. 2) The face is single and this point is

>not existing in the imaginary faces.

>In the spiritual field the only two impurities,which

>are the two layers that cover our two eyes are egoism

>and jealousy. Nobody is exceptional in these two

>impurities. Sadhana is only the eye operation to

>remove these two layers from our two eyes. Then only

>one can accept the existence of God and finally accept

>the existence of God in Human incarnation. When two

>eyes are completely covered by these two layers, one

>does not accept even in the existence of God. If the

>two layers are partially operated, the human being

>accepts the existence of God but not the human

>incarnation. When these two layers are completely

>removed, the devotee recognizes the human incarnation

>like Hanuman recognizing Rama. Because of these two

>layers many people did not recognize the human

>incarnations. Some recognized and respected but did

>not worship. A few recognized and also worshipped.

>Sometimes the human incarnation was also killed due to

>the intensity of these two layers as in the case of

>Lord Jesus. Lord Mohammed also had to fight with

>people constantly because He tried to unite the

>various sub-religions in Islam. Sankara was killed by

>blackmagic because He condemned all the sub-religions

>and united them. Swami Dayananda tried to bring out

>the real heart of Vedas and was killed by food

>poisoning. Therefore, we must carefully watch the

>various effects of these two layers present within us

>before we analyze the object. The subjective analysis

>is very important before the objective analysis.

>Sankara told that unless the mind is purified from

>these impurities (Chitta Suddhi), recognition of God

>and recognition of Human Incarnation finally (Jnana

>Yoga) is not possible.

>I have answered not only your question but also the

>root of your question. Previously the super imposition

>of face might not have been done due to the absence of

>photography and computer graphics. However, when

>Hanuman did not agree Krishna as Rama, Krishna did the

>same computer graphics by His divine power and super

>imposed the face of Rama on His face. You may not

>believe if I say that the same face of Lord Krishna

>was decorated by the dress of the face of Rama. Due to

>change in the dress the face appears different. You

>will find this fact in My photos also. Actually, it is

>the same face but appears different due to different

>external dress. Thus the human body is only the

>external dress and the single actor present in all

>these roles is the same Lord. Hanuman could not

>recognize Krishna as Rama due to this external dress

>only.

>When we see a film actor in the role of Rama in the

>cinema, the devotees look him as Rama only. They do

>not see the inner actor but only the external role.

>But some people call him by the name of the actor and

>they see only the inner actor and not the external

>role. When the Lord comes as human incarnation the

>inner actor is the Lord and the outer role is the

>human being. This is just reverse of the above. In the

>case of human incarnation also the devotees see the

>Lord who is the inner actor and not the external role,

>which is the human being. But ordinary people see only

>the external human being and not the inner actor who

>is the Lord. Therefore, whether it is the world drama

>or a drama in this world, devotees only look at the

>Lord and the other people only look at the human

>being. When I was decorated in the dress of the Lord,

>I told My devotees like this "The Lord is hidden in Me

>and wants to give the fame to this external human

>being. I am just reversing this point and brought out

>the inner Lord to outside in the form of this

>decoration and hidden Myself inside the decoration. I

>want to say that the inner hidden Lord must be seen by

>all of you, who has done all these wonderful things

>and you must give credit to the Lord only. The Lord

>hided the truth and I revealed the truth".

>

>

>His Holiness Shri Datta Swami

>

>website address:

>http://www.universal-spirituality.org

>

>e-mail address: swami (AT) universal-spirituality (DOT) org

>

>

>

>

>Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.

>

>

>------------------------ Sponsor --------------------~-->

>Would you Help a Child in need?

>It is easier than you think.

>Click Here to meet a Child you can help.

>http://us.click./sTR6_D/I_qJAA/i1hLAA/XUWolB/TM

>--~->

>

>

> Links

>

><*>

> /

>

><*>

>

>

><*> Your

>

>

>

>