Guest guest Posted April 28, 2001 Report Share Posted April 28, 2001 >Doesn't -eya typically form matronymics (like kaunteya, >vainateya), so that kaarSNeya = kRSNaa's son? > >Regards >Nath Yes, this is the normal Classical Sanskrit usage. In the UpaniSads it can form patronymics, but I think only from -i stems, not -a stems. In any case, "kaarSNeya" can't be linked to "karISa". Valerie J Roebuck Manchester, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.