Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

SV: SV: [Y-Indology] a fortunate exchange

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Stephen Hodge [sMTP:s.hodge] skrev 4. mai 2001

04:34:

> I came across a wonderful example of this recently quoted in a work on

the

> Western reception and understanding of Chinese culture. The quote came

from

> a book published by a "reputable" linguist in 1993 (I didn't take a note

of

> the details) who asserts that the Chinese language is so primitive that

one

> may suppose that it can have hardly developed much beyond a Neanderthal

> level ! Absolutely mind boggling !

 

This IS mindboggling, and particularly since it comes from a linguist. One

of the things I was taught as a student is that there is no such thing as a

"primitive" languages. Some languages have complex inflectional systems

whereas others are non-inflected. If "non-inflected" is typical of

"primitive" languages, then Norwegian is getting pretty close to the rough

and uncivilized end of things. Chinese (and a bunch of other languages in

the world) has no inflections. But why should we assume that the

Neanderthals had none?

 

> Again, I am writing some contributions to a forth-coming book on world

> mythology by a prestigious academic publisher. Looking at the proposed

> contents, it struck me as strange that it treats many beliefs of living

> religions such as Hinduism or Buddhism (as well as ancient cultures) as

> mythology but is entirely silent on the question of Christian mythology

--

> as though such a thing non-existent or perhaps taboo ! Talk about double

> standards.

 

Definitely. But at least I have seen fat books on Christian mythology

elsewhere, and the concept of Christian mythology is well-known to

academics in the field. I therefore feel inclined to ask: is your publisher

targeting the general public? If he is, he might sell less books if he

includes a section on Christian mythology. To believing Christians, there

is not supposed to be such a thing. If he is targeting Academia, I think

the omission is preposterous.

 

Lars Martin Fosse

 

 

Dr. art. Lars Martin Fosse

Haugerudvn. 76, Leil. 114,

0674 Oslo

Norway

Phone: +47 22 32 12 19

Mobile phone: +47 90 91 91 45

Fax 1: +47 22 32 12 19

Fax 2: +47 85 02 12 50 (InFax)

Email: lmfosse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

INDOLOGY, Lars Martin Fosse <lmfosse@o...> wrote:

 

> This IS mindboggling, and particularly since it comes from a

>linguist. One of the things I was taught as a student is that

>there is no such thing as a "primitive" languages. Some languages

>have complex inflectional systems whereas others are non-inflected.

> If "non-inflected" is typical of "primitive" languages, then

>Norwegian is getting pretty close to the rough and uncivilized end

>of things. Chinese (and a bunch of other languages in

> the world) has no inflections. But why should we assume that the

> Neanderthals had none?

 

Tamil too has no iinflections, and have been called as

demons (raksasas). We didn't know about Neanderthals then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...