Guest guest Posted May 4, 2001 Report Share Posted May 4, 2001 Dear George Thompson, The beauty of is that each thread has a life of its own, just like different rooms in a convention hall. You should simply ignore that particular thread that is irrelevant to you, but it clearly evokes interest from many others. You should start threads of your interest, as one does not preclude the others. Your email system can also be programmed to automatically filter messages based on a certain identifier in the 'Subject' line. David Salmon made some suggestions along these lines. Live and let live. Just to clarify: Eurocentrism is an attitude that many non-Europeans have, and that many Europeans do not have. To view the world as seen from Europe is a method of viewing and such a view can also be, and often is, constructed by people from other origins. As a concrete example: Amitav Ghosh's latest and highly acclaimed book, 'The Glass Palace', is about how Eurocentric Indians (a.k.a. Macaulay's Children) did most of the dirty work under the British to oppress the Burmese. After a couple of logical and perfectly reasonable paragraphs in your email, I am shocked to suddenly read you say: "It seems to me that you have already decided that I am a cultural racist, to use the terms of this fellow Blaut of recent discussion." Since I never made any statement about you, I fail to see how you reach this conclusion - I don't even know who you are! Perhaps, there are several erroneous conflations going on in your mind: 1. Blaut's book that I refer to is a well-acclaimed work on deconstructing European portrayal of world history, and he is one of dozens in this field from various disciplines. The paper by Blaut mentioned on the web is not on the same field of inquiry, and I presume it happens to have been found by someone doing a name search so they posted it. Therefore 'Blaut = one paper on race' is a gross error. 2. Your reading into Blaut's (unrelated) paper is also fallacious: he is not calling you a racist. Perhaps, you self-identify yourself with the attributes he describes, but then it is your own superimposition and not his. 3. On top of all these conflations, you then conclude that I call you a racist. How did you arrive at that? RM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.