Guest guest Posted May 6, 2001 Report Share Posted May 6, 2001 Dear naga ganesan, This reference to dualism was fascinating, could you please elaborate on this a bit and maybe suggest a feww reference for the ignorant ones like me.. looking forward.... v --- naga_ganesan wrote: > > Dualism - sharp focusing and differentiating > between > good and evil, light vs. darkness, is seen in RV > and Avestan > gathas. Many academic books have been published > about > the entry of the "duality" idea in the Bible > from the Near East. > The last chapter on apocalypse is said to be an > influence > from this aspect of Zoroasterism, and many books > detailing this > are available. > > The duality of black vs. white equated with evil > vs. good > is absent in old Tamil literature. For the > duality entering > from Near East into the Bible, I, among others, > have given > references > in a series, "Black as Evil" and so on from > INDOLOGy at Liverpool > website. > > What I find interesting is that the growth of > Indo-Aryan > languages in India was accompanied by > emphasizing the > Duality aspects. Just as Black vs. White > dualism, > there are two more: 1) the Indus valley tantra > aspects > put down vs. Ascetism and 2) the bull-man cult > of NE/IVC > submerged vs. Cow venerated in the RV. Contrast > this > with the fact that no cows are represented in > Indus seals. > > Regards, > N. Ganesan > indictraditions, Michael Witzel > <witzel@f...> wrote: > > SEMITIC RELIGIONS? > > > > On this and on some other related lists, the > view has been uttered > > repeatedly that it was the Semitic (or 'Semetic' > or even 'Semtic'!!) > > religions that have formed the European > (Christian) world view, a > > view that was increasingly introduced in India by > the educational > >changes instigated and institutionalized by > Macaulay in the 1830s. > > > > Forgetting, for the moment, the heated > contemporary debates inside > >the British colonial service (of the E. India > Company) and beyond, it > >must be pointed out that there is nothing > specifically "Semitic" > >about the European point of view. The Semites, in > case the ancient > >Hebrews and later on the Arabs, took over much of > their view of the > >world directly or indirectly ...from the Aryans. > > > > I am speaking of course of Zarathustra. Being a > Eastern Iranian, he > >is as good an Arya as any Rigvedic poet. The Avesta > and the Old > >Persian inscriptions call their own peoples "Ariia, > Ariya," just as > >the Rigvedic and later Vedic peoples call > themselves "Arya" and as > >they all call their speech "Aryan speech." > > > > To begin with, if one reads the Gathas of > Zoroaster even just a > >little bit, one will discover that they contain > much of the same > >language, religion and ritual as the Rigvedic > hymns: there is god > > Ahura (the still *positive* Asura of the Rigveda), > Airyaman > >(Aryaman), there are the Haoma (Soma) and Fire > rituals, there is > >the Zaotar (Hotar) priest such as Zoroaster > himself, > > there is Asha (from *arta, = Rta 'active Truth'), > etc. etc. > > > > What is new in Zarathustra's teaching is his > insistence on the > >INDIVIDUAL CHOICE his followers have to make > between 'good' and > >'evil'. Asha (Rta, active Truth) and Druj (Druh, > active Untruth, > >Deceit) are of course prominent Rigvedic concepts > as well, but > >Rigvedic people were not as pressed by their > poets/priests to adjust > >as the early Zoroastrians were. And they were not > as condemned if > >they did not always follow the path of Rta. > Vasistha himself > >suspects that he did not (RV 7.88-89) and he asks > > Varuna for forgiveness and release from > druh/anrta-induced illness. > > > > But Zarathustra says, quoting Helmt Humbach's > translation of > >Zarathustra's Gathas, Yasna 30.3-4 : > > > > "(3) There are the two spirits (present) in the > primal (stage of > one's > > existence), twins who had become famed > (manifesting themselves as) > the two > > (kinds of) dreams, the two (kinds of) thoughts > and words, (and the > two > > kinds of) actions, the better and the evil. > > And between these two, the munificent discriminate > rightly, (but) > not the > > miserly. > > (4) And when these two spirits confront each > other (to vie for a > person), > > then (that person) decides (of what nature will > be) the primal > (stage of > > his existence): > > vitality and lack of vitality, and (on the other > hand) of what > nature (his) > > existence will be in the end: > > that of the deceitful (will be) the worst, but > best thought will (be > in > > store) for the truthful one.... > > (31.20) He who may approach the truthful one, > splendor will be his > > (reward), (as contrasted) with weeping. > > A long life in darkness, foul food (and ) the > word 'woe": to that > > existence (your) religious view will lead, O you > deceitful, on > account of > > your own actions" ... " etc. etc. > > > > Sounds familiar? > > > > If the whole of the Avestan corpus would be > compared, we would > discover : > > the good Spirit and the evil Spirit, the future > Savior from the East > (Hamum > > lake), the guardian spirits, the final judgment, > the falling into > molten > > iron of the wicked at the time of judgment, the > reaching of > paradise -- an > > Iranian word anyhow: pari-daeza 'the enclosed > (park)' etc. etc. > > > > In other words, it was not a Semitic perspective, > it rather was the > Eastern > > Iranian, Aryan Zarathustra who 'invented' this > "Semitic" religion > by > > emphasizing certain aspects of traditional Aryan > religion and > deemphasizing > > others. > > > > The ancient Hebrews copied a lot of it under the > late Mesopotamian > and > > early Persian kingfs in the 7th and 6th centuries > BCE, so that the > > Essenes, contemporaries of Jesus, often sound more > Iranian than > Jewish (a > > fact usually overlooked by most Christians, or PBS > for that matter!) > > > > Fact is, that the whole of the Near East was a > huge hotchpotch at > that > > time, with ideas being copied left and right by > all people involved, > -- > === message truncated === __________ Get your free @.co.uk address at http://mail..co.uk or your free @.ie address at http://mail..ie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.