Guest guest Posted May 13, 2001 Report Share Posted May 13, 2001 I like David Salmon's general drift on this. Self empowerment is key to development. This requires sacrifice as Gandhi asked for. Others cannot do it for a community, which is why the selling out by Macaulayites has failed except to enhance divisions. The west can help with reverse transfer of technology - just like France re-imported California grapes after French grapes died of disease. There are 100,000 yoga teachers in USA and it is their 'validation' that will convince a segment of India's elite to stop calling it backward, just as it took Deepak Chopra's American legitimacy to return Ayurveda to India's 'new age' movement. Western Indology should be co-opted to help reinstall Indology centers in India's elite educational institutions, especially the hermeneutics and critical thinking. The Harvard Roundtable that I am at is an excellent example to bring together many fields, many voices, no pressure or agenda to force any conclusion, no hurry to reach the end of inquiry. More complexity as more evidence is put on the table - that's what research should be. Perhaps the Subaltern project must be re-invented. It tried to discover the indigenous and throw out the foreign superimpositions. But the methodology was Marxist rather than using Indic texts as basis. The scholars knew no Sanskrit or any Indian texts - the class struggle of the unsuccessful Marxist revolution prevented them (and still does at JNU) from any such inquiry for fear that some saffron dressed men might walk in. These ghosts they must face and deal with. The new team should be more eclectic and not premised on ANY kind of homogenization. Rajiv Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.