Guest guest Posted May 19, 2001 Report Share Posted May 19, 2001 Vidyasankarji : I agree that the third decimal place would be significant in Bamshad, et. al., "Genetic Evidence on the Origins of Indian Caste Populations", IF they had them. But I do not see how they can have results to that significance. E.g., in table two, the standard errors for estimation of frequency of the M Haplogroup are 5.5, 3.8, 5.3% respectively for Upper, Middle and Lower caste groups. Yet distances in table 1 are given to 3 decimal places. How can it be any different for Y-chromosome stuff, unless Y-chromosomes are much more uniform than mtDNA (not). Yet table 3 is given to four significant figures. Table 3. Y Chromosome (STRs) Genetic Distances between Caste Groups from Andhra Pradesh and Continental Populations Caste group Africans Asians Europeans Upper .0166 .0104 .0092 Middle .0156 .0110 .0108 Lower .0131 .0088 .0108 All castes .0151 .0101 .0102 An explanation would be most welcome. -Arun Gupta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2001 Report Share Posted May 20, 2001 I am trying to dig out the research behind the statistics, and the models of genetic drift that are presumed in comparative analyses. The numbers reported are usually based on 90% or 95% confidence level estimations. I'll share more information when I find out more. As of now, what I do know is that different markers are known to have different statistical distributions, so the autosome data (Table 5 in Bamshad et al.) and the biallele data (Table 4) in Y-chromosomes would be different, with the latter changing at a faster rate than the former. The HVR (hyper-variable region) in a gene (one of the other tables ... don't have the paper at hand now), as its name implies, is subject to lots of mutation, and is more diverse, as compared to conserved regions. So the number of significant digits in any reported number would vary with the specific genetic marker being investigated. Meanwhile, see today's Times of India, for a related feature by Chidanand Rajghatta of Washington DC. Vidyasankar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.