Guest guest Posted May 21, 2001 Report Share Posted May 21, 2001 "The story of dogs is written both in bones and in genes; and, unfortunately, they disagree. Fossils prove that wolf and dog split some ten thousand years ago and that the paths of wolf and coyote diverged a million years earlier." "Mitochondrial DNA, though, hints at an earlier domestication. To put the mitochondria of wolf and dog into coyote context puts their division at a hundred thousand years before the present, which -- given that the first modern humans appeared at about that time -- makes little sense. Fossils may be rare, but they are not ambiguous; and the tale plainly told by dog bones is more convincing than that hinted at by their genes" Steve Jones, Darwin's Ghost : The Origin of Species Updated Doubleday, 1999, 2000. Also see http://www.idir.net/~wolf2dog/wayne1.htm Multiple and Ancient Origins of the Domestic Dog "Mitochondrial DNA control region sequences were analyzed from 162 wolves at 27 localities worldwide and from 140 domestic dogs representing 67 breeds. Sequences from both dogs and wolves showed considerable diversity and supported the hypothesis that wolves were the ancestors of dogs. Most dog sequences belonged to a divergent monophyletic clade sharing no sequences with wolves. The sequence divergence within this clade suggested that dogs originated more than 100,000 years before the present. Associations of dog haplotypes with other wolf lineages indicated episodes of admixture between wolves and dogs. Repeated genetic exchange between dog and wolf populations may have been an important source of variation for artificial selection. and http://www.idir.net/~wolf2dog/wayne2.htm -Arun Gupta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.