Guest guest Posted June 8, 2001 Report Share Posted June 8, 2001 >> (It may come as a shock to some that the official language >> especially regarding royalty-- of this only remaining Hindu >> Kingdom abounds in Urdu words, including even the ceremonial >> verbs used for/by the King) >-Arun Gupta : >Why should it come as a shock ? It is common knowledge that the >royal classes of India, with few exceptions, were a support of the >Islamicate, and later, the British rule. >You are free to interpret the abolition of royalty and their privy >purses by PM Indira Gandhi as yet another Hindutva scheme. Well, the point was of course not Mrs. Gandhi (can we ever stick to the topic?!) but Nepalese language: * Nepal was and continues to be a fiercely independent Hindu kingdom. It never was under the British, nor under the Moghuls. Nor anybody else (if we forget a 3-week(!) invasion by the Sultan's forces in c. 1347 and a largely unclear situation with regard to the Tibetan empire for some time in the 8th c.). * This in spite of having been, and still being situated "like a gourd between two rocks", as the first King of united Nepal, Prthvi Narayan, said at the end of the 18th century --- then Tibet and the East India Company, now China and India. * In fact, even after a defeat in the Anglo-Nepalese war of 1814, the Nepalese court continued to conspire with Rajasthan kings (we have some letters) and to bear the standard of Hinduism -- they have invented "Hindutva" before its day. There is, for example, a contemporary unpublished Sanskrit text criticizing the British 'merchant robbers' under the name of GoraNDa. * The laws ("muluk-i ain" !!), first codified in Nepali after 1850 by the Rana regime, were fiercely Hindu. (Even now you are "awarded" 12 years in jail for killing a cow). * In spite of all of this, the court / administrative language is highly influenced by Perso-Arabic (Urdu) words: mausuf sarkaar ko hukum bamojim... ityaadi Not by conquest but by choice. Certainly not as "support of the Islamicate, and later, the British rule"; on the contrary, they were a thorn in the side of both empires. The dominant public and private culture of the general area always exerts its influence: A lot of Urdu, very little English, some Hindi films -- until the last decade. Now politicians and others have begun to sprinkle their speeches with --a few-- English words. (NB: English had and still has no official status in Nepal at all.) Its increase now is a sign of globalization. And, incidentally, not due to British/Indian influence. No Indian English in Nepal. Most of the intellgentsia have studied outside of South Asia after the first democratization in 1950. In short, things are a little bit more complicated than the present cultural wars let them appear to be... A study of Rajasthani courts would also be useful in this context. But, again, no need for Mrs Gandhi here. *** Add also: As far as Nepal is concerned, very few south of the Terai (the Madesi) know anything about - quote - "the hilly people". ((Similarly, about Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Khand, etc.)) As you can witness on this and the other list: The only thing I have read (t)here about Nepal in the present tragic and difficult situation was (1) about the study of some Royals in some Christian-run schools: Perhaps people do not know that even in the new democratic constitution (1990) freedom of religion is guaranteed but that trying to convert someone is forbidden. (The Christian wife of a former prime minister was not allowed then to appear in public functions!) But again, differently from the present cultural wars in India, note that Nepal was & is confident enough with its Hinduism (and Buddhism, local tribal religions, Islam!) to tolerate Christian schools and sending their best people there -- no fear of "loosing out" to Christianity. I myself have helped children of "staunch" Hindus to get into these schools, just because they had asked me to do so. And, even after democratization, the number of Christians has not significantly increased though (illegal) missionary activity is going on unabated... and (2), I read about the 'mongoloid eyes' of the royal family. No comment: study the history of Gorkha and the other 22/24 kingdoms! Both true contributions to the knowledge of Indology/Indian Civilization! Jaya Nepal! ======================================================== Michael Witzel Department of Sanskrit & Indian Studies, Harvard University 2 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge MA 02138, USA ph. 1- 617-496 2990 (also messages) home page: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/mwpage.htm Elect. Journ. of Vedic Studies: http://nautilus.shore.net/~india/ejvs/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.