Guest guest Posted June 11, 2001 Report Share Posted June 11, 2001 rajiv.malhotra [sMTP:rajiv.malhotra] skrev 11. juni 2001 23:25: > Definition of terms would be helpful as well. For example, in Judeo- > Christian studies, a perfectly respectable and indeed popular field > is to make `literal' interpretations of the Bible. This is called > Literalist Christianity or literalist interpretation. Nobody calls > them radicals, fundamentalists, nationalists, extremists, or the > like. As far as I know, that is precisely what we call them: fundamentalists, extremists, if not necessarily nationalists (nationalism plays little part in it, as far as I know. It is pure theology.) >As per Gallop Poll, almost half of all American Christians > believe in the literal interpretation of the Bible - hence it would > not be a viable definition of what the term `fundamentalist' means. Why not? A fundamentalist is by definition a person who interprets the Holy Scripture in a literalist sense, a person who shies away from historical interpretations and critical analysis. The fact that half the American population thinks like this, is irrelevant as far as the definition goes. >From a European perspective, it is of course a symptom of the average American's eternal lack of sophistication :-). We are not surprised. Are you, by the way, of the opinion that the average Joe's views on physics and chemistry should be a guiding light for thinking intellectuals? Lars Martin Fosse Dr. art. Lars Martin Fosse Haugerudvn. 76, Leil. 114, 0674 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 22 32 12 19 Mobile phone: +47 90 91 91 45 Fax 1: +47 22 32 12 19 Fax 2: +47 85 02 12 50 (InFax) Email: lmfosse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.