Guest guest Posted August 1, 2001 Report Share Posted August 1, 2001 The usage of the word repha to refer to the r-sign written on top of a character is a relatively recent usage, unknown to the authors of PrAtizAkhyas and Sanskrit grammars. In these texts, the term ra-kAra is absent. KAtyAyana has the general vArttika: varNAt kAraH, but then the exception rAd iphaH (ra+ipha > repha, for KAtyAyana). In these early texts, repha refers to all occurrences of the consonant t, with no reference to any written ligatures. These texts are still dealing with the description of phonetics, and not of orthography. Best, Madhav Deshpande INDOLOGY, Jogesh Panda <yogeshpanda> wrote: > > --- Harry Spier <harryspier@H...> wrote: > > > > > 2) About the name of another letter, I've always > > wondered why instead of > > like the other letters the consonent r is not called > > rakara but is called > > repha instead. > > > > The r-sign that follows a consonant [and,in writing, > is placed underneath the consonant] is in fact called > ra-kAra or ra-phalA, and the r-sign that precedes a > consonant [and is placed above the consonant] is > called a repha. > [Whitney, I remember, wrote that the r-sign is called > not a r-kAra but a repha.] > > Best wishes, > > Jogesh Panda > > > > > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Messenger > http://phonecard./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.