Guest guest Posted March 28, 2002 Report Share Posted March 28, 2002 Dear Indologists, See in the URL the recent article by Dr. R. Nagaswamy on the Harappan horse in the newspaper, The Hindu. cybalist/message/12910 Regards, N. Ganesan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2002 Report Share Posted March 31, 2002 INDOLOGY, "Harsha Dehejia" <hdehejia@c...> wrote: > There seems to be an error in the url given by Dr. Ganesan for the article > on the Harappan horse. I shall be grateful if he could give it one more > time. Dear Dr. Dehejia, Here is our friend Dr. Nagaswamy's article from The Hindu: CTamil/message/819 I gave in a disk Prof. Witzel's summary paper some months ago to Dr. Nagaswamy when he was visiting Houston. The paper is Autochtonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts. When asked about Smt. Vidya's Devi book, Dr. RN said kind words. Regards, N. Ganesan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2002 Report Share Posted April 4, 2002 >>the article >> on the Harappan horse. >Here is our friend Dr. Nagaswamy's article from The Hindu: >CTamil/message/819 Unfortunately the article is quite uninformed and mistaken, a strange thing for a professional archaeologist. See my and (R. Meadow's) answer at: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/Har-veda.htm This web site also contains the complete ongoing discussion in the THE HINDU (Jan.-March 2002) about the supposed close relationship between the Harappan Civilization and the Vedas. This was brought up, of course, by N.S. Rajaram in habitual fashion, and was then taken up for discussion by me and others. >I gave in a disk Prof. Witzel's summary paper >some months ago to Dr. Nagaswamy when he >was visiting Houston. The paper is >Autochtonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian >Texts. NB: see : http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/ejvs-new.htm or: http://users.primushost.com/~india/ejvs/issues.html Vol. 7-3 May 2001 Cheers! MW ======================================================== Michael Witzel Department of Sanskrit & Indian Studies, Harvard University 2 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge MA 02138, USA ph. 1- 617-496 2990 (also messages) home page: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/mwpage.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2002 Report Share Posted April 6, 2002 In the article below, it is stated - ""Digs" at the writings of persons such as Rajaram thus have their well-justified reasons. Especially so, as he has recently been appointed by the Minister of HRD as a member of the ICHR, just after I sent in my last piece. Such appointments spell the end of scientific history writing and open the door to Raamraaj fantasies galore. However, since I am neither an Indian citizen nor a professional historian, I refrain from further comment. " The fact is that several days before the publication of Professor Witzel's article in the Hindu, Mr. Rajaran had declined to accept the appointment. This was reported in some newspapers, although I learnt of it via an email message forwarded to me. Hence (or even otherwise), the use of epithets like 'politicians' for Rajaram or anyone else, is inappropriate. In fact, the article was replete with personal attacks and it does no credit to anyone to make an attempt now to defend it. As for the two articles of Meadow cited by him - I have read one (1995) of them, and it does not seem to offer any justification for the 'eroded layer' theory, although I will check it once again. I will also check the other article and see what it says and what proof it offers. Sincerely, Vishal INDOLOGY, Michael Witzel <witzel@f...> wrote: > http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/Har-veda.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.