Guest guest Posted April 25, 2002 Report Share Posted April 25, 2002 Atleast that's what Alan Danielou claims in his translation of the Tamil epic. This in my mind is a dubious claim as the teaching of Aravana Adigal is very similar to the philosophy of Dignaaga (which Danielou himself notes) but definitely not the shunyataa of the Maadhyamika. Danielou actually claims that some verses in Manimekhalai (where Aravana Adigal teaches Buddhist philosophy to Manimekhalai) are infact the exact quotes from Dignaaga's Nyaayapravesha. It can be claimed as Danielou does that Dignaaga was only repeating the words of an earlier master - but this again has problems as : 1. it cannot be Naagaarjuna's as his shunyataa is different from the epistemo/logical philosophy of Dignaaga and 2. Dignaaga in Buddhist tradition is himself recognized as a great aachaarya having initiated a new phase of development in Buddhist philosophy - Svaatantra Vijnaanavaada. Also to be noted is that Dignaaga was originally a brahmin from Kaanchipuram - a Tamilian. So it is very likely that it was he himself who's referred to as Aravana Adigal in the Tamil epic. But if we accept this Dignaaga's date will be pushed back to 2nd century CE, which goes against Indological dates for him as having existed around the 5th century CE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.