Guest guest Posted September 25, 2002 Report Share Posted September 25, 2002 Troy, >Thank you for pointing out my oversight. Therefore taking into proper >consideration the "extant fragmentary portions of non-Theravaadin >canonical works written on birch bark manuscripts dating from the >first century A.D. or earlier," the supposed words of an assumed >founder did not exist in any written form until as late as "4 or 5 >hundred years after their pronouncement." Still, I do not go so far. The first century A.D. is only the first date for which we have surviving Ms evidence. There is no reason to doubt that some Buddhist texts could have been put into writing from the third century B.C. onward. Tradition simply claims (for the Pali Canon) that the Canon as a whole was put in writing in the first century B.C. So my view would be that the first texts to exist in written form giving the words of the claimed founder of Buddhism probably appeared late in the third century A.D. i.e. less than two centuries after the probable date of the founder. >So my question remains: *Pronounced by whom?* > My view would be that some of them were probably the words (or an oral description of the words) of the founder and his immediate disciples. Others were probably not. As with everything else in this world of uncertainty we can speak only of probabilities. Lance Cousins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.