Guest guest Posted October 5, 2002 Report Share Posted October 5, 2002 The usual sanskrit word for happiness is "ananda"; but it is usually reserved for professional religiosi like Vivekananda, Paramananda and so on. Hence the concept of "ananda" in Indian traditions seem to be entwined with certain religous states and religious seekers who usually are renunciates from ordinary worldly engagements. Even in post-Upanishadic period aranyakas stress the life away from the ordinary social world. In Buddhism, the concept of pain is taken to new heights, with pain being the foundation of life. To some extent this view comes closer to Fruedian world view where happiness is absense of pain. As Frued's ironic advice to sufferers of neurosis to exchange unbearable neurotic misery for ordinary human unhappiness, implies modern or pre-post-modern view comes close to this Indian - or an Indian - view of life. But while modern view of a cure is meant for everyone, the Indic view of happiness is meant for a spiritual elite Is happiness as it understood now i.e. a man being happy at his son getting a well paynig job, or a connoiseur of wine tasting something an utterly new brew or a woman winning a lottery of a million pounds or a child getting an icecream, are these kind of human experiences don't come under the rubric of 'happiness' in ancient literature in India. Are there examples in ancient Indian world view of this conecpt of happiness? Of course, the Tamil Sangam lit. comes closer to this view, but would like to see more examples Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2002 Report Share Posted October 7, 2002 Most Indian literature of old is religious. With this you cannot treat the whole society based on such ideals. Traditional Brahmins, monks of Buddhism and Jainism would definitely view what normal people consider as happiness as that which leads to suffering and pain. Their worldview is based on absolute ideals - not relative living which thrives on momentary pleasures. But this doesn't mean that the rest of the society lived in such a fashion. The truly religious population at any point in time were only a very small minority - albeit a very influential one. The great majority lived the normal life enjoying the transient pleasures of the world - read the kaama literature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.