Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 I think the question is rather whether pANini is to be taken as an absolute authority, or the chaos of prakAraNa that came before him is to be status quo. I prefer to rely on pANinI, taking him as the ultimate authority for Sanskrit. The only ambiguity in his grammar is in the pronunciation of vowels, since his descriptions of opening and closure of air passages can never be so specific as those relating to the consonants. ____________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals..ca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.