Guest guest Posted January 15, 2003 Report Share Posted January 15, 2003 INDOLOGY, "Phillip Ernest" <phillip.ernest@u...> wrote: >>Dr. L. M. Fosse's words might be of use, >>INDOLOGY/message/2226 >Thank you. I guess the great indological example of this trend to >reexamine the language-race equation is Asko Parpola's theory that >the people of the Indus Valley Civilization eventually converted >to the speech (among other things) of the small Aryan sub-group >that had been living with them for some centuries (if I correctly >understand what I have read). So the racial component in that >cultural transformation would have been small. But the >transformation was so great that invasion long seemed the >only possible explanation. A. Parpola and I. Mahadavan posit that the high Harappan language was a form of ancient Dravidian, related to the languages spoken now in the south. The Aryans ingressions took place after the decline of the mature Harappan culture. Elite dominance, and acculturation to speaking IA languages possibly happened thru' some centuries. See prof. Witzel's summary of Aryan movements into India in the post-Harappan times: http://nautilus.shore.net/~india/ejvs/ejvs0703/ejvs0703article.pdf The latest issue of J. of IE studies (Fall/Winter 2002) has important papers on this Indo-Aryan migration including the archaeologist, Dr. D. P. Agarwal. http://drriley.mypcr.com/JIES.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.